Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I am unclear. Have you or have you not looked at the image in GQ? And do you think that should be in schools of any grade?
I am aware of the images. I would not have it available in grades 6 n below. Jr n senior highs schools kids -? it’s already old news. They have already seen it on their phones or computers. Do you understand that part?
I am aware of the images. I would not have it available in grades 6 n below. Jr n senior highs schools kids -? it’s already old news. They have already seen it on their phones or computers. Do you understand that part?
Images depicting pedophilia are in their phones and computers. Maybe this has gone too far already.
Images depicting pedophilia are in their phones and computers. Maybe this has gone too far already.
Some states are getting busy with content suppression for teens phones. By charging Google -FB- IG etc fines
They are 30 yrs too late. These kids have grown with certain freedoms and soon to be the next set of voters. Will see.
.
States act to curtail kids online, raising pressure on Congress
Several states are pushing legislation that would curtail online access and social media use by kids, setting up yet another potential confrontation between states and Congress on technology policy.
The Arkansas House of Representatives last week passed a bill that would require social media companies to verify the age of users and confirm that minors have permission from parents or guardians before opening an account. The bill now moves to the state Senate, which has already passed its own version of the bill.
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 12 days ago)
35,640 posts, read 18,001,275 times
Reputation: 50681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl
You miss the point. These people pushing this is schools are radical activists. I know because I sit in EVERY meeting, follow every development and know everything that's going on now. I thought my red district was immune and I found out the activists are here as anywhere. Not only that, a TEACHER who is a radical activist is organizing angry protests IN SCHOOL DURING SCHOOL HOURS USING SCHOOL EMAILs.
The comment above shows the ignorance of the average person to the agenda that is being pushed in schools. They don't WANT to come together. They want complete control.
Do you want to "come together"? Do you want to compromise, and find middle ground?
Why were they removed? Lefty censorship. No ifs, ands, or buts.
They weren't removed, can you read?? They were only taken off required reading lists. They remained in the library for any student who wanted to read them.
Say you have never been to a school board meeting without saying you have never been to a school board meeting.
I worked in a public school for 5 years. We attended several meetings when we were trying to get a new contract. I understand they are off the wall now though, people yelling and shouting over each other.
They weren't removed, can you read?? They were only taken off required reading lists. They remained in the library for any student who wanted to read them.
WHY were they removed from reading lists? WHY did the left even go there, regarding censorship?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
