Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-27-2009, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Reading, PA
4,011 posts, read 4,433,340 times
Reputation: 843

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
I think not. Provide your proof.
Proof of what? It's all common knowledge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-27-2009, 02:48 PM
 
6,902 posts, read 7,550,230 times
Reputation: 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
I think not. Provide your proof.

Here you go.

Clarence Thomas | The Oyez Project
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
2,290 posts, read 5,552,348 times
Reputation: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sagran View Post
He benefited from affirmative action but doesn't think it should exist.
As a Black man, I'm going to disagree with that. You see, the intent of affirmative action is to hire someone who's not only a woman or person of color, but who's also qualified.

Thomas is hardly qualified.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 03:05 PM
 
Location: I currently exist only in a state of mind. one too complex for geographic location.
4,196 posts, read 5,851,997 times
Reputation: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by backfist View Post
As a Black man, I'm going to disagree with that. You see, the intent of affirmative action is to hire someone who's not only a woman or person of color, but who's also qualified.

Thomas is hardly qualified.
yale law school doesn't qualify you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 03:07 PM
 
Location: Reading, PA
4,011 posts, read 4,433,340 times
Reputation: 843
Quote:
Originally Posted by backfist View Post
As a Black man, I'm going to disagree with that. You see, the intent of affirmative action is to hire someone who's not only a woman or person of color, but who's also qualified.

Thomas is hardly qualified.
LOL

I was referring to his education and earlier jobs but since you mention it, that too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 03:07 PM
 
8,425 posts, read 12,212,391 times
Reputation: 4882
An 'Uncle Tom' is a person who adopts the value opinions of his oppressor -- call it a political 'Stockholm syndrome', if you will. Clarence Thomas took in the opinions of the MO Republican who hired him out of Yale law and for the life a me I can't understand how other job options were not open to him, but I guess it is possible. After that (but not really before then) Clarence Thomas considered himself a Republican and he bought their views whole cloth. He is far different than Colin Powell or Michael Steele.

Black folks don't hate Clarence Thomas -- he is just, with good reason, considered an Uncle Tom. Since Associate Justice Thomas has gone out of his way to make political pronouncements, and eschewed the advice of older black jurists who tried to explain some things to him when he was appointed, he has sought that mantle and should not whine about wearing it.

In the words of Thurgood Marshall (quoting his father) about why folks should not just accept a person who happens to be of the same ethnicity (and why it was not mandatory that he be replaced by a black judge): "A black snake will bite you just like a white one."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 03:18 PM
 
1,490 posts, read 2,035,995 times
Reputation: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by backfist View Post
As a Black man, I'm going to disagree with that. You see, the intent of affirmative action is to hire someone who's not only a woman or person of color, but who's also qualified.

Thomas is hardly qualified.
Thomas was qualified.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 03:44 PM
 
8,425 posts, read 12,212,391 times
Reputation: 4882
Quote:
Originally Posted by omle View Post
Thomas was qualified.
Thomas never was a lawyer of SCOTUS stature. Thus, he was unqualified. Can you think of another reason why Bush appointed him?

He's different than Sotomayor, as a matter of fact, in preparation and scholarship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 03:46 PM
 
Location: I currently exist only in a state of mind. one too complex for geographic location.
4,196 posts, read 5,851,997 times
Reputation: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manigault View Post
Thomas never was a lawyer of SCOTUS stature. Thus, he was unqualified.
we just elected a community organizer to the presidency. I think thomas will be just fine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2009, 03:58 PM
 
Location: San Diego
2,521 posts, read 2,355,545 times
Reputation: 1298
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefinalsay View Post
I can't figure this out. it seems a lot of blacks can't stand him, and label him an uncle tom. anyone know why this is?
Because most blacks are liberals (vote Democratic) and Thomas is one of the most conservative judges on the Supreme Court and leans Republican.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top