Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-03-2009, 01:26 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,168,101 times
Reputation: 6195

Advertisements

WASHINGTON – Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Wednesday he shouldn't have called Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor a racist, but said he was still concerned that she would bring bias to her decisions.

In a letter to supporters, the Georgia Republican said that his words had been "perhaps too strong and direct" last week when he called Sotomayor a reverse "racist," based on a 2001 speech in which she said she hoped the rulings of a "wise Latina" would be better than those of a white male without similar experiences. Gingrich's remarks created a furor among Sotomayor's backers and caused problems for GOP figures who have been pushing to bring more diversity to the party.
Gingrich backs off 'racist' label for Sotomayor - Yahoo! News

In other words, he's coming into line with the smarter, quicker Republicans who knew right away this inflammatory talk would antagonize potential voters.

What a, um, prostitute.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-03-2009, 01:28 PM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,850,172 times
Reputation: 1942
Tell ya what I'll call her a racist for him.

Shes a racist
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2009, 01:29 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,760,703 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
WASHINGTON – Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Wednesday he shouldn't have called Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor a racist, but said he was still concerned that she would bring bias to her decisions.

In a letter to supporters, the Georgia Republican said that his words had been "perhaps too strong and direct" last week when he called Sotomayor a reverse "racist," based on a 2001 speech in which she said she hoped the rulings of a "wise Latina" would be better than those of a white male without similar experiences. Gingrich's remarks created a furor among Sotomayor's backers and caused problems for GOP figures who have been pushing to bring more diversity to the party.
Gingrich backs off 'racist' label for Sotomayor - Yahoo! News

In other words, he's coming into line with the smarter, quicker Republicans who knew right away this inflammatory talk would antagonize potential voters.

What a, um, prostitute.
Wow someone modifies a statement and they are a prostitute? What elevated discourse. By the way what office is he running for?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2009, 01:31 PM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,850,172 times
Reputation: 1942
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Wow someone modifies a statement and they are a prostitute? What elevated discourse. By the way what office is he running for?
Guess that makes Obama one also because hes said one thing and then changed his mind and said another.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2009, 01:33 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,168,101 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Wow someone modifies a statement and they are a prostitute? What elevated discourse. By the way what office is he running for?
"Modifies", lol. Let me put it this way. He reversed a statement from black to white. By doing so he proves he has no interest in Satomayor's decisions and how they might affect this country, but only is concerned with the effect hate-mongering talk might take on potential voters.

To me that's a prostitute.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2009, 01:36 PM
 
1,902 posts, read 2,469,250 times
Reputation: 543
I don't see how it fits the definition of racists. Bigoted, prejudiced, not befitting of a member of a jury let alone a judge yes, but not quite a racists statement.

She could still be racists, but that quote may not prove it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2009, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,760,703 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Let me put it this way. He reversed a statement from black to white. By doing so he proves he has no interest in Satomayor's decisions and how they might affect this country, but only is concerned with the effect hate-mongering talk might take on potential voters.

To me that's a prostitute.

Ah no he didn't. He didn't say that she was color blind he simply said calling her a racist was too harsh. No saying you are going to close Guantanamo and leaving it open is going from black to white. Or you are going to realse photos, and now you won't or.....well you get the picture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2009, 01:40 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,168,101 times
Reputation: 6195
? "color blind," that's not what I meant. Guantanamo -- Obama hasnt decided to leave it open. Release the abuse photos - probably he didnt realize how bad they were going to be. Also, he went back and forth with the decision in his own mind -- he didnt have to be yanked back on his leash by other, calmer, smarter people the way Newtie did. He came to the sensible conclusion himself - didnt have to be told.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2009, 01:41 PM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,850,172 times
Reputation: 1942
Saying you are going to give business 3,000 for hiring new employees and not doing it?

We can go on and on about the list of things Obama said he was going to do and then " CHANGED" His mind

Hey that might be the change he said we could believe in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2009, 01:41 PM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,589,909 times
Reputation: 2823
He was wise and right to back off from it. I wonder if Kennedy plans to amend his assertions regarding Alito.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top