Cheney: No link between Saddam Hussein, 9/11 (interviews, Pelosi, accuse, Pennsylvania)

[Cliff Clavin]

Originally Posted by pghquest

Anotherwords, you refuse to read the links showing that your dead wrong because your brainwashed..

Yes. The Kool-Aide right?

Where are the links that show we found WMD in Iraq?

[Sagran]

Originally Posted by pghquest

I know what YOU said, you were wrong..
- HUMAN EVENTS
Report: Hundreds of WMDs Found in Iraq - Political News - FOXNews.com (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2006/06/22/report-hundreds-wmds-iraq/ - broken link)

Now did you read what I said? There was a reason I put "AFTER" in capitals, to maybe educate you that yes, they found WMDs that Saddam claimed didnt exist. This is take two!!

Oh, Santorum. I remember him.

And a three year old article from Faux News.

About highly degraded nerve gases. Which we obviously knew he had at one time.

Excuse me if I'm underwhelmed.

Go parse some more posts and twist them around so you can spout your agenda.

[Sagran]

Originally Posted by pghquest

Hate to tell you but "Nazis" were left wingers, they believed in government controlling and limiting freedoms..

No, no, no.....communists are left wingers, facist are right wingers, dictators regardless of leanings limit freedoms.

[ELOrocks17]

Originally Posted by Sagran

No, no, no.....communists are left wingers, facist are right wingers, dictators regardless of leanings limit freedoms.

Like I said..Obama's Colectivization is well under way

[ergohead]

Originally Posted by Sagran

No, no, no.....communists are left wingers, facist are right wingers, dictators regardless of leanings limit freedoms.

Wrong! There were no limitations put on Hitler, and he was an individual. He was entirely free of any State limitations on his freedom.

The State tried to impose grammar regulations to his poor German, and those responsible ended up on meat hooks.

Whereas, in the U.S. none dared impose grammatical regulations on GWB, for fear of becoming misunderestimated.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8fbrUjjivw

[ELOrocks17]

Originally Posted by Cliff Clavin

We should have let the UN deal with it. We're not the UN. We're only a member.

Is this the same UN that allowed Syria, Sudan, and China to sit on the Human rights council?

[Cliff Clavin]

Originally Posted by ELOrocks17

Is this the same UN that allowed Syria, Sudan, and China to sit on the Human rights council?

There is only one United Nations that I am aware of. So yes.

[mary phagan]

Originally Posted by ELOrocks17

Is this the same UN that allowed Syria, Sudan, and China to sit on the Human rights council?

Yeah, I would'nt put to much stock in the U.N.

[ELOrocks17]

Originally Posted by Cliff Clavin

There is only one United Nations that I am aware of. So yes.

So, then you can agree that the UN charter is not worth the paper its printed on.

[Cliff Clavin]

Originally Posted by ELOrocks17

So, then you can agree that the UN charter is not worth the paper its printed on.

I said we should have let the UN deal with Iraq at the time. I never said they would have been effective. So to a point, I agree.