Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This spin of late has been ominous, but what's really disturbing is that the spinners' audience is so dumb they always fall for it. The spinners know that, of course -- see faux's skewed headlines and world net daily's output in general, to name two.
For example, Nazis werent socialists, they killed socialists.
Why do you let yourself be manipulated like that?
Funny that you, of all people, are asking this question to someone else.
Funny that you, of all people, are asking this question to someone else.
Link to any post where Ive swallowed some deranged claim such as "However, like those of most 'white supremacists,' many of von Brunn's political views track 'Left' rather than 'Right'" or "von Brunn advocated the socialist policies espoused by Adolf Hitler".
Everybody wants to put this guy on one end of the political spectrum or the other. This, I think, does a disservice to everyone. This guy was an idiotic, whacked out nut job who most likely had mental problems for a long time. Left or right, Neither side has a monopoly on crazy, I think crazy in itself has no political affiliation.
Think of it, next time you are in a major city and see some homeless person talking crazy talk to himself, I'm pretty sure that guy doesn't vote.
Everybody wants to put this guy on one end of the political spectrum or the other. This, I think, does a disservice to everyone. This guy was an idiotic, whacked out nut job who most likely had mental problems for a long time. Left or right, Neither side has a monopoly on crazy, I think crazy in itself has no political affiliation.
Think of it, next time you are in a major city and see some homeless person talking crazy talk to himself, I'm pretty sure that guy doesn't vote.
The problem is, the right wing spin machine is trying to persuade its sheep that this guy had leftist leanings "like Hitler's socialists." Naturally the people on the left protest.
Not sure whether the RWSM is trying to deflect from associating the guy with the right's traditional racism or actually, earnestly trying to cobble together an association in the sheep's minds of the guy with the left. They're doing both, I guess.
The problem is, the right wing spin machine is trying to persuade its sheep that this guy had leftist leanings "like Hitler's socialists." Naturally the people on the left protest.
Not sure whether the RWSM is trying to deflect from associating the guy with the right's traditional racism or actually, earnestly trying to cobble together an association in the sheep's minds of the guy with the left. They're doing both, I guess.
I Agree. The interesting thing is when this first happened, everybody was identifying him as a fringe right-wing nut job. Now that more information is available, we see its a great deal more complicated. Like a lot of people, someone like this is too complicated to be pigeonholed under a single label.
I Agree. The interesting thing is when this first happened, everybody was identifying him as a fringe right-wing nut job. Now that more information is available, we see its a great deal more complicated. Like a lot of people, someone like this is too complicated to be pigeonholed under a single label.
Link to any post where Ive swallowed some deranged claim such as "However, like those of most 'white supremacists,' many of von Brunn's political views track 'Left' rather than 'Right'" or "von Brunn advocated the socialist policies espoused by Adolf Hitler".
It wasn't relating to the recent shooting. I've seen some of your old posts saying GWB generated $ 11 Trillion of debt for the country over 8 years, when the entire public debt by the time he left office was not even $ 11 Trillion.
I don't recall the exact posts, but IMO you have made some posts that show you to be somewhat easily manipulated by the media.
Darwin-loving museum shooter hates Bible, Christians
James von Brunn, the man who allegedly shot and killed a guard at the Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., was a Darwin-lover who hated the Bible and Christians, and defies media efforts to classify him as a stereotypical "right-winger," according to reports.
The Moonbattery blog revealed von Brunn advocated the socialist policies espoused by Adolf Hitler and used Darwinian theory to support his anti-Semitism.
"The anti-Semitism of von Brunn is the first thing one notices when visiting these bizarre websites. However, like those of most 'white supremacists,' many of von Brunn's political views track 'Left' rather than 'Right.'
Clearly, a re-evaluation of these obsolete definitions is long overdue," she wrote.
Wow, so instead of taking this at face value, which is a seriously disturbed man who spent his entire life hating non-whites, you twist this into an atheist, darwin argument. That's as bad as him blaming jews for Obama or however his argument goes. Ridiculous.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
