Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-06-2009, 06:31 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,956,928 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Quote:
They said they're not keeping them.
Why do they want them?

A thought; Perhaps to prospect of obama's jack-booted thugs knocking on your door to confront you about supposed "misinformation" will be enough to not forward that email.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-06-2009, 06:31 PM
 
539 posts, read 700,357 times
Reputation: 119
b) Conditions of Disclosure.— No agency shall disclose any record which is contained in a system of records by any means of communication to any person, or to another agency, except pursuant to a written request by, or with the prior written consent of, the individual to whom the record pertains, unless disclosure of the record would be—

(1) to those officers and employees of the agency which maintains the record who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties;


(2) required under section 552 of this title;


(3) for a routine use as defined in subsection (a)(7) of this section and described under subsection (e)(4)(D) of this section;


(4) to the Bureau of the Census for purposes of planning or carrying out a census or survey or related activity pursuant to the provisions of title 13;


(5) to a recipient who has provided the agency with advance adequate written assurance that the record will be used solely as a statistical research or reporting record, and the record is to be transferred in a form that is not individually identifiable;


(6) to the National Archives and Records Administration as a record which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation by the United States Government, or for evaluation by the Archivist of the United States or the designee of the Archivist to determine whether the record has such value;


(7) to another agency or to an instrumentality of any governmental jurisdiction within or under the control of the United States for a civil or criminal law enforcement activity if the activity is authorized by law, and if the head of the agency or instrumentality has made a written request to the agency which maintains the record specifying the particular portion desired and the law enforcement activity for which the record is sought;


(8) to a person pursuant to a showing of compelling circumstances affecting the health or safety of an individual if upon such disclosure notification is transmitted to the last known address of such individual;


(9) to either House of Congress, or, to the extent of matter within its jurisdiction, any committee or subcommittee thereof, any joint committee of Congress or subcommittee of any such joint committee;


(10) to the Comptroller General, or any of his authorized representatives, in the course of the performance of the duties of the Government Accountability Office;


(11) pursuant to the order of a court of competent jurisdiction; or


(12) to a consumer reporting agency in accordance with section 3711 (e) of title 31.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 06:33 PM
 
539 posts, read 700,357 times
Reputation: 119
d) Access to Records.— Each agency that maintains a system of rec*ords shall—

(1) upon request by any individual to gain access to his record or to any information pertaining to him which is contained in the system, permit him and upon his request, a person of his own choosing to accompany him, to review the record and have a copy made of all or any portion thereof in a form comprehensible to him, except that the agency may require the individual to furnish a written statement authorizing discussion of that individual’s record in the accompanying person’s presence;


(2) permit the individual to request amendment of a record pertaining to him and—

(A) not later than 10 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) after the date of receipt of such request, acknowledge in writing such receipt; and


(B) promptly, either—

(i) make any correction of any portion thereof which the individual believes is not accurate, relevant, timely, or complete; or


(ii) inform the individual of its refusal to amend the record in accordance with his request, the reason for the refusal, the procedures established by the agency for the individual to request a review of that refusal by the head of the agency or an officer designated by the head of the agency, and the name and business address of that official;
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 06:35 PM
 
539 posts, read 700,357 times
Reputation: 119
7) maintain no record describing how any individual exercises rights guaranteed by the First Amendment unless expressly authorized by statute or by the individual about whom the record is maintained or unless pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity;
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 06:36 PM
 
539 posts, read 700,357 times
Reputation: 119
(8) make reasonable efforts to serve notice on an individual when any record on such individual is made available to any person under compulsory legal process when such process becomes a matter of public record;
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 06:38 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
I'm sure they can find a way to claim this under domestic terrorist activities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 06:40 PM
 
539 posts, read 700,357 times
Reputation: 119
p) Verification and Opportunity to Contest Findings.—

(1) In order to protect any individual whose records are used in a matching program, no recipient agency, non-Federal agency, or source agency may suspend, terminate, reduce, or make a final denial of any financial assistance or payment under a Federal benefit program to such individual, or take other adverse action against such individual, as a result of information produced by such matching program, until—

(A) (i) the agency has independently verified the information; or


(ii) the Data Integrity Board of the agency, or in the case of a non-Federal agency the Data Integrity Board of the source agency, determines in accordance with guidance issued by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget that—

(I) the information is limited to identification and amount of benefits paid by the source agency under a Federal benefit program; and


(II) there is a high degree of confidence that the information provided to the recipient agency is accurate;




(B) the individual receives a notice from the agency containing a statement of its findings and informing the individual of the opportunity to contest such findings; and
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 06:40 PM
 
2,661 posts, read 2,904,439 times
Reputation: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
(hell, why didn't he just send each american 100 grand...that would have stimulated things).
That would cost more than 30 Trillion.
But you are closer than the last two people who suggested 1 million per person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 06:45 PM
 
539 posts, read 700,357 times
Reputation: 119
You can bet...the e mails received at the White House regarding their request for informing on those who disagree on the Obama healthcare law, will be matched at other government agencies...

first they want to find out who these people are...

are they military...retired military..receiving social security..do they have a government contract..are they working in the government..

it is only the beginning..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 06:47 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
8,299 posts, read 8,609,037 times
Reputation: 3663
Quote:
Originally Posted by LogicWings View Post
You can bet...the e mails received at the White House regarding their request for informing on those who disagree on the Obama healthcare law, will be matched at other government agencies...

first they want to find out who these people are...

are they military...retired military..receiving social security..do they have a government contract..are they working in the government..

it is only the beginning..
Is that what the voices in your head tell you, or are you seeing this in your crystal ball?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:00 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top