Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d1016.pdf
Examiner Editorial: Uncovering the bull under the bailout | Washington Examiner (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Uncovering-the-bull-under-the-bailout-8426220.html - broken link)
How long before the WH mounts an attack on the IG overseeing TARP? He has raised the alarms, he has exposed the lack of accountability, he has exposed the cover-up and lies.
Millions were crying foul and "NO BAILOUT", but the politicians again didn't listen.
|
Bolded para: What are they talking about? I dont see anything about "less-than-accurate" in that GAO report or in the "sigtarp" report. It is true that TARP needs to be a lot more transparent but there are no accusations of lying or deliberate obfuscation that I see in either report.
The GAO report gives TARP about a grade "C". Lots of outcomes "remain unclear" because they havent concluded yet, etc. IOW it's still early.
The "sigtarp" quarterly report: http://www.sigtarp.gov/reports/congress/2009/October2009_Quarterly_Report_to_Congress.pdf (broken link)
a quick "good news-bad news" summary of the GAO report:
The Project On Government Oversight (POGO) Blog
This summarizing testimony from TARP on its one-year anniversary a month ago gives background to the reports --
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs | The Gov Monitor (http://thegovmonitor.com/world_news/united_states/senate-committee-on-banking-housing-and-urban-affairs-7136.html - broken link)
Interesting information, though, thanks for posting it.