Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-20-2009, 09:55 AM
 
1,179 posts, read 975,501 times
Reputation: 390

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Details, details. These researchers knew Obama was going to be president now. It's in the Mayan calendar, doncha know.
It's a conspiracy and EVERYBODY is in on it. Expect the OP who is totally clueless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-20-2009, 09:56 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,878,374 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcarlilesiu View Post
How do you think insurance companies determine what to cover at what interval?
Once again, the recommendations aren't blanket recommendations. They don't prohibit more frequent tests, if the doctor and patient think more frequent tests are necessary. The recommendations apply to healthy women who fall into the low-risk categories. Are you saying that insurance companies will also be overruling doctors on who they determine is at risk? Based on what? Because NOTHING in these recommendations give that kind of power to insurance companies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2009, 10:06 AM
 
2,229 posts, read 1,686,716 times
Reputation: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Once again, the recommendations aren't blanket recommendations. They don't prohibit more frequent tests, if the doctor and patient think more frequent tests are necessary. The recommendations apply to healthy women who fall into the low-risk categories. Are you saying that insurance companies will also be overruling doctors on who they determine is at risk? Based on what? Because NOTHING in these recommendations give that kind of power to insurance companies.
What do you "power to the insurance companies"... they already have the power to write policies as they see fit.

We are talking about preventative care. Once a doctor makes a recommendation that testing be performed, it is no longer preventative and is now a recommended procedure. Preventative care is initiated by the patient, the insured.

For instance, it is common knowledge that a preventative care check up should be perfored once annually. In part, because of these recommendations from physicians, most insurance companies will cover the cost of one preventative care visit per year. This is included in the policy because this is the recommendation made by physicians.

Now, if physicians said "we can push that back to once every 2 years"... you think insurance companies are going to go "we will still be nice, and let you go every year, even though your doctor says it isn't necessary". Absolutely not.

Now, if that same person gets sick and sees the doctor, that is also covered... but it isn't preventative care. You are using this type of situation as reason to believe that preventative care will not be affected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2009, 10:10 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,878,374 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcarlilesiu View Post
What do you "power to the insurance companies"... they already have the power to write policies as they see fit.

We are talking about preventative care. Once a doctor makes a recommendation that testing be performed, it is no longer preventative and is now a recommended procedure. Preventative care is initiated by the patient, the insured.

For instance, it is common knowledge that a preventative care check up should be perfored once annually. In part, because of these recommendations from physicians, most insurance companies will cover the cost of one preventative care visit per year. This is included in the policy because this is the recommendation made by physicians.

Now, if physicians said "we can push that back to once every 2 years"... you think insurance companies are going to go "we will still be nice, and let you go every year, even though your doctor says it isn't necessary". Absolutely not.

Now, if that same person gets sick and sees the doctor, that is also covered... but it isn't preventative care. You are using this type of situation as reason to believe that preventative care will not be affected.

Oh, please, it goes beyond being merely preventative when your doctor says your health risks merit greater monitoring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2009, 10:19 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,934,013 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Paranoid dillusional regurgitating FOX spin.
Hardly! Go figure a man to try to support that testing, be it mammograms or Pap smears, has not saved thousands of women's lives every year by helping physicians discover these cancers before symptoms become evident. With breast and cervical cancers, once symptoms become evident, the likelyhood of successful treatment and long-term survival have significantly decreased.

The OBGYN care that women receive in the U.S. is significantly more timely and more comprehensive than that received in countries with socialized medicine.

Get mad women, really mad! Fight back! Flood your representatives phone lines. This is just a small glimps of the forced healthcare rationing to come if Government gets its way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2009, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
They have to cut back. There is no way they can afford this and take on millions of people and have the taxpayer subsidize this. They have to cut back on preventative care.

There are not enough doctors, nurses and hospitals to take on these millions of newly insured.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2009, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,703,250 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Hardly! Go figure a man to try to support that testing, be it mammograms or Pap smears, has not saved thousands of women's lives every year by helping physicians discover these cancers before symptoms become evident. With breast and cervical cancers, once symptoms become evident, the likelyhood of successful treatment and long-term survival have significantly decreased.
I am not arguing that many women haven't been saved, however, it is just plain wrong to ignore the risks inherent in many of these tests. Why is it always acceptable to tell women what to do with their bodies, but not what not to do with them???? I'm sorry, but, I can just as easily see a conspiracy behind the recommendations for constant testing. Just one more indication that someone wants to control our bodies.


Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
The OBGYN care that women receive in the U.S. is significantly more timely and more comprehensive than that received in countries with socialized medicine.
Right. That's why the U.S. infant mortality rate is so much worse than it is in those countries.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Get mad women, really mad! Fight back! Flood your representatives phone lines. This is just a small glimps of the forced healthcare rationing to come if Government gets its way.
No, it isn't.

Last edited by TigerLily24; 11-20-2009 at 10:55 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2009, 10:28 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,878,374 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Hardly! Go figure a man to try to support that testing, be it mammograms or Pap smears, has not saved thousands of women's lives every year by helping physicians discover these cancers before symptoms become evident. With breast and cervical cancers, once symptoms become evident, the likelyhood of successful treatment and long-term survival have significantly decreased.

The OBGYN care that women receive in the U.S. is significantly more timely and more comprehensive than that received in countries with socialized medicine.

Get mad women, really mad! Fight back! Flood your representatives phone lines. This is just a small glimps of the forced healthcare rationing to come if Government gets its way.
Why don't you read the studies and the statistics that the doctors based their recommendations on? Mammograms and pap smears have indeed been key in the saving of thousands of lives. But they also inadvertently have bad effects as well. The studies aren't doing away with mammograms and pap smears, they are modifying the frequency and how early they should become part of a woman's regular healthcare regime. The recommendations can support themselves based on the science.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2009, 11:19 AM
 
2,229 posts, read 1,686,716 times
Reputation: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Oh, please, it goes beyond being merely preventative when your doctor says your health risks merit greater monitoring.

Then one simple question.

Why do these groups issue recommendations in the first place?

Being that it is a case by case basis, even for preventative care, as you say. Further, that the insurance companies pay no attention to these recommendations when writing policies.

Why would they issue a recommendation in the first place?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2009, 11:21 AM
 
2,229 posts, read 1,686,716 times
Reputation: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
They have to cut back. There is no way they can afford this and take on millions of people and have the taxpayer subsidize this. They have to cut back on preventative care.

There are not enough doctors, nurses and hospitals to take on these millions of newly insured.

Exactly.

And since my own private, affordable, insurance will be sacrificed by these recommendations.... Im not a happy camper.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top