Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Just to give you a clue, it is rude to assume that people who disagree with your views are
"whiners" and that labeling those people as "Neo-confused" is quite ignorant of you.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,368,826 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by pommysmommy
Just to give you a clue, it is rude to assume that people who disagree with your views are
"whiners" and that labeling those people as "Neo-confused" is quite ignorant of you.
And what about those who whine only because they aren't getting their way? Or would that be a little too close to home? Like the hypocrites who aren't upset because they claim the 'you lie' statement is correct yet feign outrage at equally true comments about the SCOTUS.
Gee, I wonder if all the whiners were equally upset at Dick Cheney's response when told 2/3s of the American people didn't support the Iraq war.
Just to remind the short memoried Neo-Confused, that response was : "SO?"
Or are they all just hypocrites who believe only those of one party should act according to the will of the people?
We have a Constitutional mandate to provide for the common defense. No war is ever popular after the first two years, but they, unlike a government takeover of health care, are necessary.
Just look at what these blood thirsty, war mongering Democrats had to say on the subject.
Come on people. Why do you think Obama moved to Chicago?
To learn the exact same thing he is applying. He did this to win his Senate seat. He did nasty things to his competition to win the election.
It is in his blood. He was taught early on what he had to do to get what he wants and at cost.
Look into his history, its been an well planned thing with a lot of money coming from Anti American groups or individual to back him up.
He went to Chicago for a reason. It sure the heck was not to be a silly community organizer.
I wonder how much more the majority of Americans are going to take his corrupt criminal ways of doing things.It is getting old and people are not liking the way he runs things by twisting arms and buying off votes with OUR MONEY.
If the right is confused then what the heck is the left?
The party in total power and control of the country has driving us into the ground and you have the nerve to call the right confused.
As far as the war goes, your VP and your SOS both voted to send our troops to war, so are they the same as Cheney who had no control over the vote?
Answer is yes, they are worse then Cheney, they voted to send our troops to war along with several other democrats.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,368,826 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey
We have a Constitutional mandate to provide for the common defense. No war is ever popular after the first two years, but they are necessary. Just look at what these blood thirsty, war mongering Democrats had to say on the subject.
Invading/occupying a country that's done nothing to you and poses no imminent threat to you is by no stretch of the imagination 'defense'. Especially when recent events have created no doubt as to where the real threat lies.
We have a Constitutional mandate to provide for the common defense. No war is ever popular after the first two years, but they are necessary. Just look at what these blood thirsty, war mongering Democrats had to say on the subject.
Invading/occupying a country that's done nothing to you and poses no imminent threat to you is by no stretch of the imagination 'defense'. Especially when recent events have created no doubt as to where the real threat lies.
Biden and Hillary along with several democrats actually voted to invade another country?
So are we invading Afghanistan then? Obamas choice of wars?
How about those drones Obama ordered? How many woman and children have been killed by his order to use the drones?
Invading/occupying a country that's done nothing to you and poses no imminent threat to you is by no stretch of the imagination 'defense'. Especially when recent events have created no doubt as to where the real threat lies.
The definition of what was or was not an eminent threat changed on 9/11.
What was or was not a legitimate campaign issue changed when Democrats realized they could hang an unpopular war they voted to authorize around Bush's neck.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Or would that be a little too close to home? Like the hypocrites who aren't upset because they claim the 'you lie' statement is correct yet feign outrage at equally true comments about the SCOTUS.
