Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-19-2010, 07:01 AM
 
Location: TX
1,096 posts, read 1,835,518 times
Reputation: 594

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WatermelonRat View Post
Texas, being a larger state, is a major consumer of textbooks. If they change their textbook standards to fit their agenda, it will effectively impose the propoganda textbooks on other states, as a textbook company will be more likely to simply change all of it's books instead of creating a "Texas-only" version. This measure in California is presumably meant to counter that.
BS (not you personally, just this line of reasoning)

I'm not an expert on book publishing, but last year my mother-in-law self published a book for children about Indian poetry/songs/nursery rhymes. It is just something she had always wanted to do - she is not a professional writer - 1st run was 10,000 copies. My wife and I helped with the editing and provided occasional advice along the way - so I got more than a glimpse of the entire process.

What I learned from this is -anyone can print and buy pretty much anything they want. I am guessing the states that feel that the Texas Board of Education is "imposing propaganda" on them are taking advantage of the low pricing and 'plug-and-play' simplicity of purchasing the ready-made Texas textbooks rather than cough up the cash and invest the time/money/effort to print their own. If my mother-in-law can write/edit/publish 10,000 copies of a hardcover childrens book in less than one year, I'm pretty sure state boards of education would have similar rates of success if they chose to. I believe it's a matter of putting your money where your mouth is. I mean, when you're cheap and lazy and purchase according to that philosophy you can't turn around and whine about the product not being exactly what you wanted. So I agree - the pissin' and moanin' is all either political grandstanding or truly not understanding what is going on.

Last edited by tyanger; 05-19-2010 at 07:15 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-19-2010, 11:16 AM
 
3,292 posts, read 4,475,416 times
Reputation: 822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
This part is sooooo CA Liberal..... Yet they see nothing wrong with it!
Toddlers with a taste for 2 percent milk would be out of luck under a bill that would create new beverage standards in California's licensed day care facilities. AB2084 by Assemblywoman Julia Brownley, D-Santa Monica, would require day cares to serve only low-fat or nonfat milk to children ages 2 and older, limit juice to one serving a day and ban drinks with added sweeteners. Brownley says this will help combat rising childhood obesity by reducing children's caloric intake and teaching healthier habits
No this is actually CA doing something right and the rest of the country showing that their gigantic failures regarding nutrition standards. You would make a terrible parent. I'm going to guess you're going to go with "Well! If the kids like it you should give it to them" school of child rearing.

Mind telling me how this is a bad thing?

Last edited by FinkieMcGee; 05-19-2010 at 11:43 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2010, 11:38 AM
 
Location: NC
191 posts, read 143,976 times
Reputation: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by californio sur View Post
No. but California certainly isn't going to tolerate ignorance. If it is OK in Texas that creationism is taught in public schools then that's their right. But don't expect other states to buy into such stupid nonsense.

Funny how they cant tolerate it but they facilitate it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2010, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,393,592 times
Reputation: 1802
Here are comments about the other changes Texas wants included in school textbooks:

"Study of Sir Isaac Newton is dropped in favor of examining scientific advances through military technology. The education board has dropped references to the slave trade, calling it "Atlantic triangular trade.", as if slavery is a natural by-product of commerce. The Civil Rights Movement created "unrealistic expectations of equal outcomes" for minorities in America." California Declares War On Texas Textbooks

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top