Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Point is, if this was actually some sort of big deal and a 'crime' as some people are alluding to, don't you think it would have been a huge issue when Reagan did the exact same thing?
There are many members of Congress, including some Democrats, that want to know exactly what took place between the WH and Sestak...including conversations with Sestak's brother and the meeting with Bill Clinton on the day the WH counsel offered the whitewash explanation. Also, a similar situation took place in Colorado that should be investigated. If members of Congress keep the pressure up then this will not just go away.
Something tells me the FBI would have a much different story than what the WH and Sestak have publicly reported happened.
There are many members of Congress, including some Democrats, that want to know exactly what took place between the WH and Sestak...including conversations with Sestak's brother and the meeting with Bill Clinton on the day the WH counsel offered the whitewash explanation. Also, a similar situation took place in Colorado that should be investigated. If members of Congress keep the pressure up then this will not just go away.
Something tells me the FBI would have a much different story than what the WH and Sestak have publicly reported happened.
Yet when Republican Presidents do the exact same thing, its not a controversy....
However, Reagan did the exact same thing Obama did, offer someone who is running in a Primary a job in the administration if they were to drop out. Yet no big stink was made from it back then.
Point is, if this was actually some sort of big deal and a 'crime' as some people are alluding to, don't you think it would have been a huge issue when Reagan did the exact same thing?
I'm not sure what happened there but just when did this law pass? If it was after Reagan's time in office and the Dems worked to have it passed wouldn't it be funny if it came back to bite them in the A$$? LOL
Point is, if this was actually some sort of big deal and a 'crime' as some people are alluding to, don't you think it would have been a huge issue when Reagan did the exact same thing?
We never found out all the particulars of that, and Hayakawa ended up deciding not to run for office, and he did not work for Reagan either, which means it was different then what we have today with Sestak, who did run.
What we have today is relevant, what might have happened yesteryear does not matter today.
I'm not sure what happened there but just when did this law pass? If it was after Reagan's time in office and the Dems worked to have it passed wouldn't it be funny if it came back to bite them in the A$$? LOL
Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any employment, position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit, provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit, to any person as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or special election to any political office, or in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Against what, offering Sestak a government job if he dropped out of the democratic party primary?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.