Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
 [Register]
Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary The Triangle Area
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-06-2007, 09:07 PM
 
23 posts, read 81,235 times
Reputation: 13

Advertisements

Hey everyone-

I signed up for DirecTV vs. Time Warner Cable for my new home in Raleigh. It'll be my first time with satellite cable- how much does bad weather (storms) affect the reception? My wife and I will be investing in a HD TV and thought DirecTV would be a logical choice b/c it will offer more HD channels in the near future.

Any feedback on DirecTV vs Time Warner Cable?

Thanks much!

Jason

 
Old 08-06-2007, 09:35 PM
 
Location: North Raleigh
820 posts, read 2,788,863 times
Reputation: 475
Now that TWC added ESPN2HD and The CW-HD we've got a lot less gripes. In the past the cable HD signal has been the better of the two while the standard definition signal was best on Direct TV. I keep reading in Home Theater that Direct TV is getting more sats and better/less compression (This would provide more bandwidth and a better HD signal) but I don't know if that is all in place yet. If all things were equal TWC would still be my preference because I don't like the contracts you sign with sat providers in order to get the equipment cheaper. Yes, I'd rather "rent" the equipment on a monthly basis.

All that said. having TWC I still miss out on Turner South (Braves games when not on TBS), and the NFL package that is exclusive to Direct TV
 
Old 08-06-2007, 09:43 PM
 
81 posts, read 301,473 times
Reputation: 34
We just got TWC--HD/DVR system 2 weeks ago. We've had 2 outtages, one time the remote wouldn't work, 2 missed recordings (may have been operator error.....ahem), and for the past 2 days the guide hasn't worked. And believe it or not, we don't watch that much TV...Argh! I miss my Dish Satellite! I hope the bugs will work themselves out soon. Good luck to you.
 
Old 08-07-2007, 04:06 AM
 
Location: Virginia (again)
2,697 posts, read 8,700,028 times
Reputation: 1565
We use Time Warner. My main complaint is it's more expensive than dish in our situation. We have two HD DVRs and it's about $100 per month (although you get a good deal for the first year). We haven't had any service problems. Once FIOS comes Time Warner will have to compete--can't wait.
 
Old 08-07-2007, 04:17 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
770 posts, read 2,754,939 times
Reputation: 620
Quote:
Originally Posted by sls76 View Post
We use Time Warner. My main complaint is it's more expensive than dish in our situation. We have two HD DVRs and it's about $100 per month (although you get a good deal for the first year). We haven't had any service problems. Once FIOS comes Time Warner will have to compete--can't wait.
Call twc up and tell them you are reviewing your finances and doing a comparison of prices. WE have tv and internet and they reduced the price by $25 per month for a year with a quibble
 
Old 08-07-2007, 05:39 AM
 
Location: Boston
107 posts, read 425,458 times
Reputation: 75
Default we tried both and prefer cable

I've had both cable and dish and I strongly prefer cable for a few reasons. We tried directv for a year and went back to cable because we missed the on demand option that comes with cable. Yes, we had a dvr but we always forgot to record shows we wanted to watch (usually premium chanel series such as the sopranos). Dish also charged a lot more for the HD DVR but the cable DVR and HD DVR was the same price. As for the HD chanels, to get HD local chanels with dish we had to use an antenna which got finnicky and sometimes we couldn't get good reception for HD NBC or HD ABC. Cable was a little more expensive but worth it. After a year of cable our promotional deal was over (cable-internet-phone) and they raised our bill so my husband called and threatened to switch back to dish and they made our bill $15 less than it was during our promotional year. This made our cable cost the same as the dish! The cable internet was faster than the DSL too.
The only thing we miss about dish was the fact that you don't have to point the remote at the box to change the channel- this makes for easy channel surfing whereever you sit.
 
Old 08-07-2007, 05:45 AM
 
Location: Virginia (again)
2,697 posts, read 8,700,028 times
Reputation: 1565
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve54 View Post
Call twc up and tell them you are reviewing your finances and doing a comparison of prices. WE have tv and internet and they reduced the price by $25 per month for a year with a quibble
You must be more persuasive than I am because I tried twice and they wouldn't budge which surprised me because when I had a similar situation in Richmond with Comcast they offered me a better price. There just is not enough competition here currently.
 
Old 08-07-2007, 06:03 AM
 
9,680 posts, read 27,173,593 times
Reputation: 4167
We've always had Time-Warner.

After North Raleigh was rewired with fiberoptic, reliability went to almost perfect. Only power failures knock them out.

Have basic + mid-tier analog service. No premiums, no box rentals, no high prices - $48.50. Also Roadrunner Lite. Switched from regular to save $20/mo permanently. Slow on downloads, but not a concern to me.

Consider what you really need before buying packages.

Time-Warner has no commitments and will fix any equipment failure free.
 
Old 08-07-2007, 07:28 AM
 
Location: Holly Springs, NC USA
3,457 posts, read 4,655,705 times
Reputation: 1907
I was able to get TWC to reduce the rate $25 per month as well. I find TWC reliability to be mediocre to poor. We did complain as we had so many outages one month that the reduced our bill but we had to bicker with them over it.
 
Old 08-07-2007, 07:30 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
770 posts, read 2,754,939 times
Reputation: 620
Quote:
Originally Posted by sls76 View Post
You must be more persuasive than I am because I tried twice and they wouldn't budge which surprised me because when I had a similar situation in Richmond with Comcast they offered me a better price. There just is not enough competition here currently.
I called on a Sunday afternoon and literally said I was checking my financial options and asked the lady if there were any offers I could take advantage of and she came back straight away with the $25 - no problem.
I was ready for a haggling session but not required - guess I got lucky
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:54 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top