Two of the council members have made videos stating they were not consulted about stopping the parade. The rest of them most likely weren't told, either. I know it was not mentioned at last week's council meetings. The mayor said it was the decision of city staff, so she blamed them and also said it was to "honor" the little girl, which, of course wasn't true.
The new city attorney may have advised other staff not to approve the permit. But who knows when you have a city leader who you can't trust. I'm glad they're having at least a "motor-vehicle-less" parade.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pierretong1991
On matters like this, the city council leans heavily on the advice of the city attorney so it's likely they were advised not to allow the parade to go on this year by the city attorney
|
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
