Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Of course you are, you don't approve or you wouldn't ask this silly question.
Quite the opposite actually. I have dated girls with sexual histories and I don't give a damn about their pasts, personally. This question stems from a conversation I was having with a group of friends. Each category represents a stance they each took.
Fairly recently I was 'booty calling' a certain gentleman and the subject of 'where is this going' came up. He told me he couldn't see himself dating a woman who would have sex so early in a relationship. I stopped him and said 'and what makes YOU think I'd be with someone who has sex so early on in a relationship??'. It took him a minute to get what I was saying... I think it's a tad hypocritical to expect things of someone that you aren't doing yourself...
Right on JJ. Some people, both men and woman are sooo hypocritical when it comes to sex. Stone throwers abound! It's funny how people are so quick to judge sex in general based on some standard that they could not live up to!
2 very common Examples:
Woman who freak when you say you have been with more than 10 woman! Then you find out later that she has been with twice that many men!
Men who will bang a chick and say they wouldn't see her in a long term relationship because she put out to quick when they are doing the same thing! Tit for tat is my rule!
These days, I barely judge past permiscuity any different than how many shoes she has had. If shes comfortable and open enough to say she has been with XX number of partners, who am I to judge.
Side note: Whats funny from my experience the best lovers in the world have never been with woman who have been with a lot of men
Morality aside, we can atleast acknowledge nature's law that men are essentially designed for casual sex; women are not. Like it or not, it's a double standard that was imposed upon us by simple biology.
Morality aside, we can atleast acknowledge nature's law that men are essentially designed for casual sex; women are not. Like it or not, it's a double standard that was imposed upon us by simple biology.
My findings at how similar men and woman are on acting out on their sexuality is growing everyday. Way more similar than I would have believed a year ago.
My findings at how similar men and woman are on acting out on their sexuality is growing everyday. Way more similar than I would have believed a year ago.
Yeah. Men and women are not that different from each other, though some like to believe that we are. Women even have multiple orgasms, so biology really has nothing to do with monogamy, imo.
Yeah. Men and women are not that different from each other, though some like to believe that we are. Women even have multiple orgasms, so biology really has nothing to do with monogamy, imo.
Havent been with a woman who stopped at one in ten years. Just figured they were more open to it these days!
Yeah. Men and women are not that different from each other, though some like to believe that we are. Women even have multiple orgasms, so biology really has nothing to do with monogamy, imo.
Some men can have m.o. as well. And studies have shown that the male instinct is naturally inclined to "breed". You never hear women talking about any wild oats they have to sow. Are you male?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.