07-01-2011, 06:40 PM
Location: Pa
42,763 posts, read
52,880,668 times
Reputation: 25362
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Prince_Frog
Yup. That doesn't have to be expensive either.
One year an ex showed up with 2 ribbons and put them on her boobs.
That was a good night.
Hhahaha ewww.....and I hope they weren't the sticky ones!? Oh good grief that would hurt. Poor girls.
07-01-2011, 06:42 PM
104 posts, read
108,530 times
Reputation: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Raena77
Yep, couldn't have said it better.
I like to go after what I like .
Women should be passive.
Men have ALWAYS been the assertive ones and women always passive, it worked in the 1950's... so why change it?
07-01-2011, 06:45 PM
17,869 posts, read
21,002,282 times
Reputation: 13949
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Raena77
Hhahaha ewww.....and I hope they weren't the sticky ones!? Oh good grief that would hurt. Poor girls.
lol. no. They were..snap on? basically just pull them off or slide them on.
They were not poor girls. Now, they were used frequently that night, but they were not poor.
07-01-2011, 06:46 PM
2,725 posts, read
5,191,457 times
Reputation: 1963
Assertiveness is a tool to get a person out of trouble, not into trouble. A woman should be able to be assertive when she needs to be.
07-01-2011, 06:48 PM
104 posts, read
108,530 times
Reputation: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by
crisan
Assertiveness is a tool to get a person out of trouble, not into trouble. A woman should be able to be assertive when she needs to be .
Like when? In what kind of situation would a woman need(or even want) to be assertive?
07-01-2011, 06:50 PM
406 posts, read
580,875 times
Reputation: 349
Quote:
Originally Posted by
raptor-jesus
Men should do the pursuing, always.
Nope. These days, there's no reason for a man to always pursue.
07-01-2011, 06:51 PM
406 posts, read
580,875 times
Reputation: 349
Quote:
Originally Posted by
raptor-jesus
Women should be passive.
Men have ALWAYS been the assertive ones and women always passive, it worked in the 1950's... so why change it?
That in itself isn't the reason things worked. That's the way things were because the majority of women had little to no options.
07-01-2011, 06:53 PM
Location: Pa
42,763 posts, read
52,880,668 times
Reputation: 25362
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Prince_Frog
lol. no. They were..snap on? basically just pull them off or slide them on.
They were not poor girls. Now, they were used frequently that night, but they were not poor.
Hahahaha.....stop talking about your ex! Or I will tell you what I did with mine.
07-01-2011, 06:55 PM
17,869 posts, read
21,002,282 times
Reputation: 13949
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Raena77
Hahahaha.....stop talking about your ex! Or I will tell you what I did with mine.
Fair enough. I'll concede this argument because that ex isn't worth my time anymore.
07-01-2011, 06:56 PM
Location: Pa
42,763 posts, read
52,880,668 times
Reputation: 25362
Quote:
Originally Posted by
raptor-jesus
Women should be passive.
Men have ALWAYS been the assertive ones and women always passive, it worked in the 1950's... so why change it?
If I waited for men....my arse would freeze over. Sure they flirt and stuff but to have it in them to ask you out is just a waste of time.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com .