Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 04-19-2012, 05:18 PM
 
2,146 posts, read 3,062,186 times
Reputation: 12249

Advertisements

Politics & Other Controversies--it's another forum here. You'd fit in well there with your bomb through the transom window style.

 
Old 04-19-2012, 05:18 PM
 
30,902 posts, read 33,008,032 times
Reputation: 26919
Quote:
Originally Posted by underthesun7 View Post
I will definitely check that board out, however, my question was regarding relationships.
So when you say you "don't like the way society is going" you mean you only don't like women's part in relationships as that part of society you don't appreciate?

You actually are making two statements here (you're not really "asking" anything since you're convinced in advance): 1. that American women are materialistic. 2. that American women's materialism is the downfall of all of American society.
 
Old 04-19-2012, 05:18 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,951 posts, read 49,198,692 times
Reputation: 55008
Quote:
Originally Posted by underthesun7 View Post
I will definitely check that board out, however, my question was regarding relationships.
I don't think so. It was a rant on materialistic women that could best be handled in the other forum.
 
Old 04-19-2012, 05:21 PM
 
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
252 posts, read 555,735 times
Reputation: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerZ View Post
So when you say you "don't like the way society is going" you mean you only don't like women's part in relationships as that part of society you don't appreciate?

You actually are making two statements here (you're not really "asking" anything since you're convinced in advance): 1. that American women are materialistic. 2. that American women's materialism is the downfall of all of American society.
My question wasn't for knowledge but instead others thoughts on the subject.
 
Old 04-19-2012, 05:21 PM
 
30,902 posts, read 33,008,032 times
Reputation: 26919
Quote:
Originally Posted by underthesun7 View Post
I was asking whether relationships will be possible (for everyone) with a gender that is so one sided.
Dunno...(shrug) Relationships seemed possible all this time that consumerism was so "one-sided" the other way (when men made nearly all the buying decisions, for example).

So I guess your answer is: there's no reason to believe relationships won't "be" possible, partly due to my example above, and partly due to the very obvious fact that relationships are currently possible between men and women in the U.S.

HTH.
 
Old 04-19-2012, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Huntersville/Charlotte, NC and Washington, DC
26,700 posts, read 41,748,461 times
Reputation: 41381
Quote:
Originally Posted by underthesun7 View Post
Thats where people get confused. I am not gender bashing. I love women. However, I am disappointed where our society is going.
You specifically called out materialstic WOMEN not materialistic people. That isn't gender-bashing?
 
Old 04-19-2012, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
252 posts, read 555,735 times
Reputation: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerZ View Post
Dunno...(shrug) Relationships seemed possible all this time that consumerism was so "one-sided" the other way (when men made nearly all the buying decisions, for example).

So I guess your answer is: there's no reason to believe relationships won't "be" possible, partly due to my example above, and partly due to the very obvious fact that relationships are currently possible between men and women in the U.S.

HTH.
Actually, women often handled the bookkeeping and made purchases. Your idea that man was the purchaser is false. When men were the main bread earners, how could they shop while at work?
 
Old 04-19-2012, 05:25 PM
 
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
252 posts, read 555,735 times
Reputation: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dissenter View Post
You specifically called out materialstic WOMEN not materialistic people. That isn't gender-bashing?
Well when 85% of the consumers are men, then we can call them out as well. But half the population only makes up 15% of consumption.
 
Old 04-19-2012, 05:27 PM
 
Location: Texas
391 posts, read 688,185 times
Reputation: 499
I still see a lot of women shopping in grocery stores... presumably
that is for their families rather than something purely self indulgent.
 
Old 04-19-2012, 05:27 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,951 posts, read 49,198,692 times
Reputation: 55008
Quote:
Originally Posted by underthesun7 View Post
Well when 85% of the consumers are men, then we can call them out as well. But half the population only makes up 15% of consumption.
Please answer my question... What are you going to do about changing the way things are ? You just going to rant ?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top