Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-14-2014, 08:07 PM
 
2,087 posts, read 2,849,295 times
Reputation: 1561

Advertisements

Everybody's life is different.

I imagine for people who have lots of options that the line between attracted and unattracted is very rigid.

I mean for me, there's this woman who works in my office who is in her mid to late 50s, is chubby and I think she's pretty hot. There's so much gray area with what I am attracted to. And I do think that whether you think black/white or in shades of grey has a lot to do with not only the amount of options you have, but the way you were raised to think about attraction.

I guess if you're so rigid in your attraction, then you shouldn't. But if you feel so lonely that you have to keep asking if you should take a chance on an ugly person, then yea, I guess go for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-15-2014, 12:13 AM
 
Location: Jupiter
10,216 posts, read 8,305,593 times
Reputation: 8628
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJS99 View Post
Everybody's life is different.

I imagine for people who have lots of options that the line between attracted and unattracted is very rigid.

I mean for me, there's this woman who works in my office who is in her mid to late 50s, is chubby and I think she's pretty hot. There's so much gray area with what I am attracted to. And I do think that whether you think black/white or in shades of grey has a lot to do with not only the amount of options you have, but the way you were raised to think about attraction.

I guess if you're so rigid in your attraction, then you shouldn't. But if you feel so lonely that you have to keep asking if you should take a chance on an ugly person, then yea, I guess go for it.
Go for who you are attracted to and never settle. You will be unhappy. I could never be with somebody I wasn't attracted to. I'd rather be alone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2014, 06:17 AM
 
341 posts, read 455,713 times
Reputation: 339
When I was in college, I was really attracted to jocks. Didn't really work out so well for me. Making out after a party? Sure. Relationship-wise, not so much. But my college was not a place where people really dated - it was all about hook ups or else long term relationships. Nothing in between.

When I got to graduate school, I found myself attracted to the same guys everybody was attracted to. Again. And I made a concerted effort to change my focus. Seriously. One day I was like, "Enough!" And I started paying attention to which guys I actually enjoyed hanging out with, as opposed to which guys made it hard for me to speak a coherent sentence.

Guess what? Attraction absolutely grows! Two of the guys that I would say were my favorite people EVER were not guys that you would call conventionally attractive by any stretch. But I got to know them, I loved hanging out with them, and I was absolutely totally in love with each of them (at different times, haha). And when it started, the only thing I was really attracted to was their personalities.

I will also tell you, though, that the first time I met my husband I did swoon a little, and I am still very attracted to him. But I would never date somebody based solely on appearance. There is so much more than that to a person!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2014, 06:41 AM
 
Location: Huntersville/Charlotte, NC and Washington, DC
26,699 posts, read 41,742,544 times
Reputation: 41381
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrissycs View Post
When I was in college, I was really attracted to jocks. Didn't really work out so well for me. Making out after a party? Sure. Relationship-wise, not so much. But my college was not a place where people really dated - it was all about hook ups or else long term relationships. Nothing in between.

When I got to graduate school, I found myself attracted to the same guys everybody was attracted to. Again. And I made a concerted effort to change my focus. Seriously. One day I was like, "Enough!" And I started paying attention to which guys I actually enjoyed hanging out with, as opposed to which guys made it hard for me to speak a coherent sentence.

Guess what? Attraction absolutely grows! Two of the guys that I would say were my favorite people EVER were not guys that you would call conventionally attractive by any stretch. But I got to know them, I loved hanging out with them, and I was absolutely totally in love with each of them (at different times, haha). And when it started, the only thing I was really attracted to was their personalities.

I will also tell you, though, that the first time I met my husband I did swoon a little, and I am still very attracted to him. But I would never date somebody based solely on appearance. There is so much more than that to a person!!
To your last two sentences, we are talking about NOT dating people due to their appearance. My opinion is the same, no attraction, no date. Simple as that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2014, 06:43 AM
 
Location: New Zealand and Australia
7,454 posts, read 13,426,017 times
Reputation: 7783
Its always possible to get someone you are attracted to, for most people. Sometimes it can take a lot of persistence, like many things in life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2014, 06:43 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,210 posts, read 107,883,295 times
Reputation: 116153
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrissycs View Post
When I was in college, I was really attracted to jocks. Didn't really work out so well for me. Making out after a party? Sure. Relationship-wise, not so much. But my college was not a place where people really dated - it was all about hook ups or else long term relationships. Nothing in between.
How did people get to the long-term relationship stage without dating?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2014, 06:46 AM
 
341 posts, read 455,713 times
Reputation: 339
Hanging out (but not "dates", like, at parties or in dorm rooms) and then Sex. Weird place, college.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2014, 06:52 AM
 
4,038 posts, read 4,863,390 times
Reputation: 5353
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrissycs View Post
Guess what? Attraction absolutely grows! Two of the guys that I would say were my favorite people EVER were not guys that you would call conventionally attractive by any stretch. But I got to know them, I loved hanging out with them, and I was absolutely totally in love with each of them (at different times, haha). And when it started, the only thing I was really attracted to was their personalities.

I will also tell you, though, that the first time I met my husband I did swoon a little, and I am still very attracted to him. But I would never date somebody based solely on appearance. There is so much more than that to a person!!
I'm down with this. I've been surprised enough times by women who turned out to be extremely cool in spite of a "meh" outward appearance, that I'll talk to almost anyone now, and give them a chance. You never know. There are surprise packages out there. In a very good way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2014, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Canada
11,795 posts, read 12,030,796 times
Reputation: 30426
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrissycs View Post
When I was in college, I was really attracted to jocks. Didn't really work out so well for me. Making out after a party? Sure. Relationship-wise, not so much. But my college was not a place where people really dated - it was all about hook ups or else long term relationships. Nothing in between.

When I got to graduate school, I found myself attracted to the same guys everybody was attracted to. Again. And I made a concerted effort to change my focus. Seriously. One day I was like, "Enough!" And I started paying attention to which guys I actually enjoyed hanging out with, as opposed to which guys made it hard for me to speak a coherent sentence.


This is really the crux of the issue. No, you shouldn't date someone you are not attracted to, however there seem to be a few people here who have a very specific physical type, so specific that they can't get a date.

Part of dating is being open-minded, not rigid. Someone not falling into your exact preference doesn't mean they're unattractive. If you have your heart set on a curvy brunette, it doesn't make the blonde with the swimmer's build ugly. Your unwillingness to be more open to a variety of people is what is shooting yourself in the foot, because even if you find your physical ideal, it doesn't end at external appearance. Personality comes into play, not to mention a mutual attraction. Why anyone would want to narrow their scope such that it becomes so difficult to find someone is beyond me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2014, 07:16 AM
 
Location: New Zealand and Australia
7,454 posts, read 13,426,017 times
Reputation: 7783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty2011 View Post


This is really the crux of the issue. No, you shouldn't date someone you are not attracted to, however there seem to be a few people here who have a very specific physical type, so specific that they can't get a date.
.

People say that but it many cases IMO it goes out the window when you connect with a person. It has for me personally and I've said on here what I'm physically attracted to in a girl.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top