Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I am still trying to wrap my mind around the concept of how a woman can think a stranger will be decent in bed, other than by conflating 'hot' and 'decent in bed'.
This is why most women aren't into sex with strangers.
Aw that is sad. One of the things I've gotten from reading this forum is the idea that I don't want to have sex with another person if I can't expect it to be as good for them as it would be for me. (This was with a specific person in mind, but it's a good general principle to follow.)
Getting dumped before getting their "O", is the point. Wham-bam-thankyou-ma'am has never gone over well with the ladies.
This is exasperating to the thinking man. Women are designed to have multiple orgasms. What sort of nitwit wouldn't want women to fulfill their design? It's not a zero-sum game!
Aw that is sad. One of the things I've gotten from reading this forum is the idea that I don't want to have sex with another person if I can't expect it to be as good for them as it would be for me. (This was with a specific person in mind, but it's a good general principle to follow.)
This is exasperating to the thinking man. Women are designed to have multiple orgasms. What sort of nitwit wouldn't want women to fulfill their design? It's not a zero-sum game!
lol! There are a lot of nitwits out there, I guess. Go tell 'em, Tiger!
lol! There are a lot of nitwits out there, I guess. Go tell 'em, Tiger!
Here's another way to look at it:
Arbitrarily define the effort (assuming skill and care) required to bring a man to orgasm as 1 unit of effort. (A handy convenience of arbitrariness is that the numbers work out just the way you want.)
The average effort required to bring a woman to orgasm (assuming the same skill and care as above), especially in the case of multiple orgasms is probably going to be less than 1 unit of effort, and declining over some range in the case of multiple orgasms.
So 1 unit of effort typically gets more/better results when applied to women than when applied to men (and over some range, marginal results improve with additional units of effort). This suggests that a lot of men are either ignorant, selfish, or lazy.
Am I understanding you correctly, freemkt--you think a female orgasm takes less effort to induce than a male one?
I was assuming proper foreplay - not factored into the effort (it's play, right? ). So it depends on where you start the effort clock, I guess. It all sounded good, but...
...and in the middle of investigation, it breaks down.
Except when you're going for more than one. Don't bother analyzing...let's go out there and have fun. Go team!
I don't remember any more, but I think the bolding was hers, not mine. Either way, of course the number would go up, but it wouldn't come close to the men's number. STD risks go both ways, as does getting dumped (though I don't see how relevant that is to practitioners of casual sex).
Most of the women that you ask that describe why they aren't interested in casual sex indicate that they want something "more", a connection, the aspects of a relationship that casual sex doesn't offer. While I don't doubt that sexual satisfaction is a factor, it pales in comparison to the aforementioned.
Agree agree. Someone said getting dumped before climaxing may be the reason why women may think twice about this. A guy could also have doubts about having casual sex with a woman who just lays there like a starfish or deer on headlights and be dumped before even getting things started. Risks for casual sex go both ways.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.