Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Regardless of how people feel about 49's actions....it wouldn't be the same if the roles were reversed. I didn't mean to interrupt the chastising of someone for stupid actions...I know that makes everyone feel better about themselves.
Yes it would.
There was a post about a girl who walked out on a guy because he put ketchup on something she cooked. People called her an idiot also.
It's not about a guy or girl, it's about pathetic behavior in people.
There was a post about a girl who walked out on a guy because he put ketchup on something she cooked. People called her an idiot also.
It's not about a guy or girl, it's about pathetic behavior in people.
That's the thread I was looking for (whichever one it is)! And there were a few celebrations about that as well, if you'll recall. I agree, it's ugly behavior. But to say it's equal both ways......nope.
Edit: Found the thread. Not as much celebration as I remembered. My apologies. It was still significantly different to how 49's getting treated, but then again, he's coming in here defending himself, which always adds fuel to everyone's fire.
Regardless of how people feel about 49's actions....it wouldn't be the same if the roles were reversed. I didn't mean to interrupt the chastising of someone for stupid actions...I know that makes everyone feel better about themselves.
I would treat the op the same way if the genders were reversed. If you think this guy did the right thing - just say so, if that's how you feel.
I would treat the op the same way if the genders were reversed. If you think this guy did the right thing - just say so, if that's how you feel.
I don't believe you would. I could very well be wrong, and I think we'll have to just agree to disagree on that.
As for the second part...I'm not sure what would make you think that. I'm just not a fan of hypocrisy. Anybody that thinks they're doing anything helpful by tearing someone (who's obviously inexperienced) a new one is kidding themselves. I think it just serves them better to feel good about themselves.
I don't believe you would. I could very well be wrong, and I think we'll have to just agree to disagree on that.
As for the second part...I'm not sure what would make you think that. I'm just not a fan of hypocrisy. Anybody that thinks they're doing anything helpful by tearing someone (who's obviously inexperienced) a new one is kidding themselves. I think it just serves them better to feel good about themselves.
You can believe whatever you would like to about me but that doesn't make it true. I don't agree or disagree with people based on their gender. There are several female posters that I have laid into as we'll. And if a woman walked out on her date for merely stating that he had a child, I would find that just as reprehensible. In fact, there is a poster here who might do that. I have no respect for people that treat people this way. I think they have a screw loose. I treat people I don't like better than that.
I don't believe you would. I could very well be wrong, and I think we'll have to just agree to disagree on that.
As for the second part...I'm not sure what would make you think that. I'm just not a fan of hypocrisy. Anybody that thinks they're doing anything helpful by tearing someone (who's obviously inexperienced) a new one is kidding themselves. I think it just serves them better to feel good about themselves.
People can be both. But even if you replace "inexperienced" with "*******" in my post, the point still stands.
I think your point stands if you were to put ******* in your original statement.
If he's simply inexperienced then he would deserve to hear it. You're right though, he's just basically a whining, unfriendly and judgmental person. So, I suppose it is kind of useless. What I don't get is why he even posts here?
I'm not going to get into the details of what's ok/what's not ok....obviously everyone is entitled to do what they feel is right and to suffer the consequences (societal or otherwise) afterwards. But the underlined is simply not true; we even had a thread recently that was specifically about it.
Edit: Trying to find the thread. Something like "what would make you walk out on a date"? or something involving dealbreakers?
We didn't even finish dinner. I paid for it and left.
Lol, I would at least had dinner before leaving. Not out of some moral obligation to the woman, but because you already paid for it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
