Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Is it okay for women to seek male escorts for sex?
Woman: Yes it is okay for a woman to seek male escorts 32 36.78%
Woman: No it's not okay for a woman to seek male escorts 4 4.60%
Man: Yes it is okay for a woman to seek male escorts 44 50.57%
Man: No it's not okay for a woman to seek male escorts 7 8.05%
Voters: 87. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-23-2014, 12:01 PM
 
2,560 posts, read 2,638,768 times
Reputation: 1484

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 49ersfan27 View Post
I'm pretty sure any man would bang you for free.
However there's likely few guys that would for free bang her with her getting an orgasm and/or as much pleasure as him. Seems it's a case of free sex vs orgasmic enjoyable sex (escorts).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-23-2014, 12:08 PM
 
6,548 posts, read 7,279,139 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by udolipixie View Post
However there's likely few guys that would for free bang her with her getting an orgasm and/or as much pleasure as him. Seems it's a case of free sex vs orgasmic enjoyable sex (escorts).
Screwing a random woman doesn't guarantee a man great sex either. What we do know is that women can get sex in a snap. So orgasm or not, it doesn't make sense for women to put any kind of effort or money to get sex with an escort.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 12:11 PM
 
Location: NW Nevada
18,160 posts, read 15,628,539 times
Reputation: 17150
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoCUBS1 View Post
Yes, just make sure they are tested and safe. We should legalize and regulate prostitution in order to protect the consumers and workers...
NV has legalized prostitution. There are pretty strict testing requirements the houses have to meet and the girls have no worries about crazy tricks that want to hurt them. Tony and Angelo are only a push of a button away. A girl hits the panic button in their room and its only seconds before the offending creep is being tossed into the scuppers.

I don't know of any male services offered. I have heard they exist, but I don't know how that might work. I would assume the same laws apply that do to the other houses. Legalities also vary from county to county. Prostitution is not legal everywhere. Just in the rural counties actually, with Lyon, Storey and Mineral and Nye being the main ones. The famous houses are in Lyon and Storey.

I've heard rumors of these "stud farms" but I wouldn't have the foggiest where they are or what ...services...are offered. But I'm sure the same medical laws that apply to females apply to these places. I gotta wonder how these guys do it. Unless they have penile implants or something. A guaranteed command performance every time, seems like it would be...difficult. Especially if the client is particularly nasty and gross. Well, modern technology hath its wonders.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 12:11 PM
 
2,560 posts, read 2,638,768 times
Reputation: 1484
Quote:
Originally Posted by onihC View Post
Screwing a random woman doesn't guarantee a man great sex either. What we do know is that women can get sex in a snap. So orgasm or not, it doesn't make sense for women to put any kind of effort or money to get sex with an escort.
Egh I didn't state 'great sex' I stated orgasmic and enjoyable with enjoyable being getting as much pleasure as the other. Screwing a random gal does pretty much guarantee a guy an orgasm as generally guys orgasm from sex. The same can't be said for gals screwing a random guy as evident by the orgasm gap.

What is known going by studies is that the sex gals can get in a snap likely isn't enjoyable or orgasmic for her. So it does make sense for women to put effort or money to get sex with an escort if she wants sex to be orgasmic or enjoyable for her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Houston, Tx
8,227 posts, read 11,146,531 times
Reputation: 8198
Quote:
Originally Posted by 49ersfan27 View Post
I'm pretty sure any man would bang you for free.
She says she doesn't know any men or have any friends.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 12:19 PM
 
6,548 posts, read 7,279,139 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by udolipixie View Post
Egh I didn't state 'great sex' I stated orgasmic and enjoyable with enjoyable being getting as much pleasure as the other. Screwing a random gal does pretty much guarantee a guy an orgasm as generally guys orgasm from sex.
Orgasm at the end doesn’t mean sex was great. This is where women think they can’t be bad in bed at all simply because guys can climax. It’s like eating bread with water while being hungry. Will your hunger be satisfied? You bet. Would it mean your meal was great? Nope. Besides, isn’t sex not all about just having an orgasm?
Quote:
So it does make sense for women to put effort or money to get sex with an escort if she wants sex to be orgasmic or enjoyable for her.
I am yet to see as many male nudie bars, pornography, male-for-women prostitution, etc. Why? Women simply don’t need to jump through hoops or put any effort, money, or romancing to have a man shag her. Maybe one of those guys will have her happy in the end. Can’t really say ALL guys won’t satisfy a woman as well as the opposite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 12:26 PM
 
2,560 posts, read 2,638,768 times
Reputation: 1484
Quote:
Originally Posted by onihC View Post
Orgasm at the end doesn’t mean sex was great. This is where women think they can’t be bad in bed at all simply because guys can climax. It’s like eating bread with water while being hungry. Will your hunger be satisfied? You bet. Would it mean your meal was great? Nope. Besides, isn’t sex not all about just having an orgasm?
Again nowhere did I talk about great sex or even use the word great. It seems you are continuously bringing up 'great sex' something I didn't even mention to deter from gals may easily get sex however most likely it will not be orgasmic or enjoyable for them hence why male escorts are reasonable and make sense.

Ironically this post further supports my reasoning. A gal can easily get screwed by some random guy and have him dump a load in/on her however that doesn't necessarily mean her desires are fulfilled and she was pleased because she had sex. Thus male escorts make sense as they likely would be more inclined and willing to fulfill her desire than some random guy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by onihC View Post
I am yet to see as many male nudie bars, pornography, male-for-women prostitution, etc. Why? Women simply don’t need to jump through hoops or put any effort, money, or romancing to have a man shag her. Maybe one of those guys will have her happy in the end. Can’t really say ALL guys won’t satisfy a woman as well as the opposite.
More likely the reason is that gals aren't as visually stimutaled in regards to male nudie bars and pornography. As for male-for-female prostitution there is still the seemingly prevalent shaming of female sexuality ala master key/s-word lock and the downplay dismissal of the female orgasm. Plus it seems in my opinion that gals want guys to love them far more than they want guys to just bang them.

The lack of hoops gals don't need to jump through supports my reasoning on why male escorts make sense as guys are eagerly sexually available for their own sex drive so most likely the sex is going to be about fulfilling his desires not hers.

Nowhere did I state all guys so I'm unsure why you're telling me can't really say all guys. I did state it makes sense to use a male escort rather than some random guy if a gal is looking for orgasmic and enjoyable sex and that's supported by the orgasm gap and studies showing that in hookups guys are more likely to be focused on pleasing themselves than hers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 12:41 PM
 
6,548 posts, read 7,279,139 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by udolipixie View Post
Again nowhere did I talk about great sex or even use the word great. It seems you are continuously bringing up 'great sex' something I didn't even mention to deter from gals may easily get sex however most likely it will not be orgasmic or enjoyable for them hence why male escorts are reasonable and make sense.
Point is the same. Great or not great, women can get sex easier than men. We do agree on that, right?
Quote:
A gal can easily get screwed by some random guy and have him dump a load in/on her however that doesn't necessarily mean her desires are fulfilled and she was pleased because she had sex
I agree…OR that same woman can easily get sex and be happy with the outcome. A man cannot get sex as easy as women do and when he finally gets some it doesn’t mean it will be great either.
Quote:
Thus male escorts make sense as they likely would be more inclined and willing to fulfill her desire than some random guy
It’s like saying all prostitutes will work hard on having men satisfied while many may simply want to get the job done and move on to someone else and make more money (more guys = more money…long time with a guy = less money made).
Quote:
As for male-for-female prostitution there is still the seemingly prevalent shaming of female sexuality ala master key/s-word lock and the downplay dismissal of the female orgasm
Yes. There is still lots of taboo on female sexuality. Reason why women are still ashamed to admit masturbating, having one night stands, having many partners, and so on. For whatever reason, male-to-female prostitution is just not necessary really. A pimp for that would go broke in a blink.
Quote:
Plus it seems in my opinion that gals want guys to love them far more than they want guys to just bang them
That’s right. Girls want guys to love them far more than just bang them. Guys want girls to love them more than just use them as their personal ATM or meal ticket.
Quote:
The lack of hoops gals don't need to jump through supports my reasoning on why male escorts make sense as guys are eagerly sexually available for their own sex drive so most likely the sex is going to be about fulfilling his desires not hers
And a guy that just wants to bang doesn’t necessary mean he doesn’t want to please a girl. Guys also find it pleasurable to see their girl enjoy it. Guess why guys get disappointed when their girl doesn’t climax and even get shamed? While girls don’t really get shamed for being bad in bed. Heck, many women don’t even think they can ever be bad in bed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 12:53 PM
 
Location: Kuwait
15 posts, read 20,703 times
Reputation: 17
In my opinion it's not okay seeking for escorts regardless of gender. Escorts and people who seek for them are disgusting and pathetic. Sorry if my language was a bit harsh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 12:55 PM
 
2,560 posts, read 2,638,768 times
Reputation: 1484
Quote:
Originally Posted by onihC View Post
Point is the same. Great or not great, women can get sex easier than men. We do agree on that, right?
The point is that the sex gals can get is more orgasmic and enjoyable for guys than gals hence why male escorts make sense. A guy screwing a random gal is pretty much guaranteed orgasmic and enjoyable sex while a gal screwing a random guy is not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by onihC View Post
I agree…OR that same woman can easily get sex and be happy with the outcome. A man cannot get sex as easy as women do and when he finally gets some it doesn’t mean it will be great either.
Again you keep going on and on about great sex when nowhere did I talk about great sex or use the word great. I am talking about why for orgasmic and enjoyable sex male escorts make sense. So your talks about orgasmless sex, great sex, etc is irrelevant as the scope is about 'orgasmic and enjoyable' sex.

Quote:
Originally Posted by onihC View Post
It’s like saying all prostitutes will work hard on having men satisfied while many may simply want to get the job done and move on to someone else and make more money (more guys = more money…long time with a guy = less money made).
Not really as the scope of satisfaction I'm talking about is 'orgasmic and enjoyable (as in getting as much pleasure as the other)'. It doesn't take a gal working hard to achieve that for guys as a gal can just lie there and the guy will most likely orgasm and get more enjoyment from it than her.

A gal doesn't necessarily have to put in effort/work on her part for a guy to orgasm or enjoy it (as in get as much pleasure as her). It seems a guy does have to put in effort and work for a gal to orgasm and enjoy it and going by the orgasm gap and studies most guys are not willing to do this so male escorts make sense for orgasmic and enjoyable sex.

Quote:
Originally Posted by onihC View Post
And a guy that just wants to bang doesn’t necessary mean he doesn’t want to please a girl. Guys also find it pleasurable to see their girl enjoy it. Guess why guys get disappointed when their girl doesn’t climax and even get shamed? While girls don’t really get shamed for being bad in bed. Heck, many women don’t even think they can ever be bad in bed.
Their girl....note those keywords in your post about guys pleased by female enjoyment. In a random encounter going by studies it's unlikely that the guy is going to be disappointed if she doesn't climax or be shamed for it as she is just a gal not their gal. Even in cases of a guy being with their gal studies show gals orgasm less than one half as often as guys so it seems guys aren't that motivated by their supposed pleasure to see their gal enjoy sex and aren't that disappointed.

On your a guy that just wants to bang doesn't necessarily mean he doesn't want to please a gal I'm talking about likelihoods hence the repeated use of 'likely'. A guy that just wants to bang is more likely to just please himself going by studies on hookups.

It makes sense for a gal who is seeking orgasmic and enjoyable sex to pay a male escort who has incentive to please her and will be more likely to do as she desires than risk a random guy chancing that he wants to please her as well and will please her. The mindset on guys looking for random hookups seems to be getting sex not making the sex orgasmic and enjoyable for the gal.

Last edited by udolipixie; 06-23-2014 at 01:06 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top