Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm not ignoring them. I acknowledge that they say that they want that, yes.
Ruth, listen to the man. Over at the Red Pill community, they have women figured out better than women have themselves figured out. In fact, they know women so well that they end up spending their entire lives spitting game trying to bag one. And one day, Ruth, it's gonna happen...It's gonna happen. You watch. Women just don't know it yet; they don't know that they're being hypnotized and pulled in by their innate desire to be with an alpha. Just wait for it, Ruth. The world is gonna soon be overtaken by the alphas of the Red Pill community. And they'll all be laughing at you over their GNC whey protein shakes. Count on it!
You're ignoring the women who have posted saying they don't like flash, and that guys with high-end cars are kind of a turn-off.
There's no reason to listen to all these women, he started out by letting us know 98% of women find him attractive. There is no problem, it's us not him, we're attacking him and telling him all those degrees mean a little wiener. Dont you remember? This is not hyperbole....AND since then he has found Areola, and he's going to "put a rang on that thang"... at Arbys. Onion Rang.
The bolded part is where you're generalizing about what women like, as if they can all be simply summed up as a group of being social status whores. That is the part where I think you're wrong. My GF couldn't care less about social status. She just wants to spend time with me, relax, and have fun in our spare time. We run together, bike, go to brunch, go to the movies, go camping, drink/party with friends, partake in copious amounts of love making, etc. We're both college educated, we both have good jobs, we're both financially stable. What you're describing sounds like an episode of the Kardashians, and frankly it sounds like the least desirable thing to me.
You're college educated with a good job. What do you think that's indicative of? Your socioeconomic status (probably a better term than "social status").
You're interpreting what I'm saying as an episode of the Kardashians. That's not what I'm saying.
Quote:
Let me ask you this? Have you ever had a long term romantic relationship with another woman? Like more than six months long that wasn't just a FWB? If so, I'm really curious how that was.
So because you disagree with something I'm saying, you question whether or not I've had any success with women or life. You'll fit right in on this forum. I can honestly see why OP became so irritated with these responses.
And, to answer your question, yes, I've had legitimate relationship with actual women that have lasted more than 6 months. Those relationships went well and ended for various reasons with me being the dumper on all occasions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SQL
Ruth, listen to the man. Over at the Red Pill community, they have women figured out better than women have themselves figured out. In fact, they know women so well that they end up spending their entire lives spitting game trying to bag one. And one day, Ruth, it's gonna happen...It's gonna happen. You watch. Women just don't know it yet; they don't know that they're being hypnotized and pulled in by their innate desire to be with an alpha. Just wait for it, Ruth. The world is gonna soon be overtaken by the alphas of the Red Pill community. And they'll all be laughing at you over their GNC whey protein shakes. Count on it!
What a bizarre response. Have you taken your medications today?
You're college educated with a good job. What do you think that's indicative of? Your socioeconomic status (probably a better term than "social status").
You're interpreting what I'm saying as an episode of the Kardashians. That's not what I'm saying.
So because you disagree with something I'm saying, you question whether or not I've had any success with women or life. You'll fit right in on this forum. I can honestly see why OP became so irritated with these responses.
And, to answer your question, yes, I've had legitimate relationship with actual women that have lasted more than 6 months. Those relationships went well and ended for various reasons with me being the dumper on all occasions.
What a bizarre response. Have you taken your medications today?
I'm not part of any obscure online community.
The problem is that your first contribution on this thread was about all the "white knights" and "feminists" that plague this sub. Almost immediately, you lost credibility with me. However, believe it or not, you had some valid points that I agree with.
But as I suspected, you eventually moved on to more hyperbolic generalized statements about women. It's no coincidence that I knew this was the direction you were heading. The fact of the matter is that your skewed, misinformed line of thinking is not unique in any way. It is quite common, in fact, particularly among the MGTOW and Red Pill movement. You have not found the magic formula for captivating and luring women. You know why? Because there is no magic formula. Women are individuals, as both you and I are individuals. They have individualistic qualities, goals, interests, and preferences. Your claim that all women seek social status in relationships is the equivalent of saying that men only think with their genitalia. Not only is it wrong, it's pretty offensive.
And now here you are, so oblivious to your own arrogance (my business success this, I always dumped them, etc.), that it's rather difficult to keep a straight face while I respond. These are the kinds of things people with fragile egos boast about to persuade themselves and others that they do indeed have it figured out. All those people who I know who are truly confident don't spew this cringeworthy BS. The fact of the matter is that I'm only responding to you out of my own fascination of the warped views of whatever male-centric, misogynist cult that you slithered out of. But before you go on, let me go grab a bucket of popcorn. Because whatever you have to say next is sure to be interesting.
The problem is that your first contribution on this thread was about all the "white knights" and "feminists" that plague this sub. Almost immediately, you lost credibility with me. However, believe it or not, you had some valid points that I agree with.
The term "feminists" and "white knights" are widely known. By "white knight", I mean p****. Better?
I was thinking that word to begin with, but didn't think it was appropriate for a public forum.
Quote:
But as I suspected, you eventually moved on to more hyperbolic generalized statements about women. It's no coincidence that I knew this was the direction you were heading. The fact of the matter is that your skewed, misinformed line of thinking is not unique in any way. It is quite common, in fact, particularly among the MGTOW and Red Pill movement. You have not found the magic formula for captivating and luring women. You know why? Because there is no magic formula. Women are individuals, as both you and I are individuals. They have individualistic qualities, goals, interests, and preferences. Your claim that all women seek social status in relationships is the equivalent of saying that men only think with their genitalia. Not only is it wrong, it's pretty offensive.
Again, very bizarre statement. What magic formula? Who is saying anything like that?
Socioeconomic status is an attractant to women. There is TONS of research to back this up and it's true based on my own experiences.
Quote:
And now here you are, so oblivious to your own arrogance (my business success this, I always dumped them, etc.), that it's rather difficult to keep a straight face while I respond. The fact of the matter is that I'm only responding to you out of my own fascination of the warped views of whatever male-centric, misogynist cult that you slithered out of. But before you go on, let me go grab a bucket of popcorn. Because whatever you have to say next is sure to be interesting.
But I have had business success (as well as other success) and I have been the dumper in all of my relationships. How else you would like me to say that?
I've also had many business failures and many rejections from women. I've also had women stop seeing me prior to the relationship stage. That wasn't relevant to the discussion previously, but I will gladly expand on it if you'd like. Send me a PM though, as we don't want to hijack this gentleman's thread.
The term "feminists" and "white knights" are widely known. By "white knight", I mean p****. Better?
I was thinking that word to begin with, but didn't think it was appropriate for a public forum.
Again, very bizarre statement. What magic formula? Who is saying anything like that?
Socioeconomic status is an attractant to women. There is TONS of research to back this up and it's true based on my own experiences.
But I have had business success (as well as other success) and I have been the dumper in all of my relationships. How else you would like me to say that?
I've also had many business failures and many rejections from women. I've also had women stop seeing me prior to the relationship stage. That wasn't relevant to the discussion previously, but I will gladly expand on it if you'd like. Send me a PM though, as we don't want to hijack this gentleman's thread.
Hear that ladies? That socioeconomic status is luring you in, and you don't even realize it. It's been researched.
If socioeconomic status was what attracted women, then there'd clearly be no poor or lower middle class people in the world. Your theory is about as concrete as quicksand. It's like a table with two legs, it can't stand.
Hear that ladies? That socioeconomic status is luring you in, and you don't even realize it. It's been researched.
If socioeconomic status was what attracted women, then there'd clearly be no poor or lower middle class people in the world. Your theory is about as concrete as quicksand.
I agree. I keep telling these youngsters here to grow up and get themselves educated. It's ok, most men learn as they get older. All is not lost
I agree. I keep telling these youngsters here to grow up and get themselves educated. It's ok, most men learn as they get older. All is not lost
I agree. I think most men do grow up and figure it out. However, I have a 32 y/o "friend" who still talks like this and it's very disturbing. I think a lot of it stems from not having a strong, positive male influence in their lives. They wind up being so lost on how to attract women, that they end up finding one another and devising warped schemes and theories about what works and what doesn't. All the while they'll have other successful men and women telling them that they're wrong, but at this point, they've convinced themselves that it works because that's what movies and rap music tells them works.
Hear that ladies? That socioeconomic status is luring you in, and you don't even realize it. It's been researched.
If socioeconomic status was what attracted women, then there'd clearly be no poor or lower middle class people in the world. Your theory is about as concrete as quicksand. It's like a table with two legs, it can't stand.
So much so that I married a man who hadn't owned a car in, gosh, 10 years, and was living off savings after a business venture he was recruited for went south in the area he was living in just before we met. He jokes that he was a hobo, though supported himself just fine, and lived minimally.
I agree. I think most men do grow up and figure it out. However, I have a 32 y/o "friend" who still talks like this and it's very disturbing. I think a lot of it stems from not having a strong, positive male influence in their lives. They wind up being so lost on how to attract women, that they end up finding one another and devising warped schemes and theories about what works and what doesn't. All the while they'll have other successful men and women telling them that they're wrong, but at this point, they've convinced themselves that it works because that's what movies and rap music tells them works.
Lol that's right cause women are nothing but ******* and hoes right? Must be true cause some ignorance little thug in a rap said so.....and we wonder about the disintegration of the family unit??? Throw in porn and young men without father's really know how to treat women.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
