Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She said it wouldn't help because she has a THYROID problem. I've heard that one a time or two...or three. Most of those who claim a thyroid problem don't have it.
I agree, but I have to tell you as one who does have hyperthyroid issues, it's hard as all get out to get the weight off. I had to experiment with food combinations for months and even after finding foods that didn't exacerbate or not change the situation, I continue to workout and exercise 3 times as much as I eat. The other option was medication. No way, too young. And yes, I had weight on before I was diagnosed. But in the end, size does matter, because I've had more "offers" since I've lost that weight and gotten back into good shape. Not bad for someone headed toward 50.
Ok now the question comes up (no pun intended or maybe there is) what is the ideal "size" since size does matter to some out there?
We actually did an, erm, "scientific experiment" this past weekend. Apparently, my comfortable length limit is about 6 1/2 inches, give or take a bit. (I have to wait until this weekend to do the "girth" part of the project...which I feel is the more important measurement anyway.)
Roughly, for me, the ideal girth is something that I can get my hand around (and not have much of a gap). Any bigger than that, and it's just too uncomfortable. Much smaller than that, and it just doesn't give the same pleasure.
From what I can figure, from reading the true scientific studies, my "preferred size" pretty much fits the standard, average size of men out there.
As far as deviating from that, it's a tough question to answer because it's not something that I have to deal with at the moment. I will say though that I was with a guy (*way* back in my past lifetime) who was on the small side, in both length and girth. Intercourse was quite boring, since there were only a few (rather uncomfortable positions) that gave me any sort of pleasure. I was also with a guy, for a brief period, who had a freakishly large organ. Again, not pleasant, at all.
So, yes, size is important for me. Of course, it's also the skill of the owner, but there are times when deviations in size (whether big or small) simply doesn't work. And, yes, I would have to think seriously about committing myself to that person.
Just like men who like a certain size lady chest or lady behind...women also are particular about a man's organ...I agree with mishigas on that point. There's nothing wrong with this at all. I too have had similar experiences to Mishigas as well and I can frankly declare I am perfectly happy with my husband when it comes to the bedroom moments. Even if his organ was a tad smaller or whatever, I would still be satisfied with him because of his skills in that area so I would say looking at the outside parts are a natural thing BUT it's the bedroom skills used which make everything either great or not so great.
Has no one brought up the shoe size comparison for men?! Big feet = Big organs.
Not true. In Sexology elective we learned that in a survey where they measured the largest man wore a size 7 1/2 shoe. And that 5 was about average. You know why women are bad at math? Because guys are always telling them that this ---------------------------------------------->
is 8 inches.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.