I am confused though
allen. You probably know my position on god. Christians always claim he manages
each and
every event in this universe, and god knows they give him credit whenever something "wonderful' happens. Like, you know, a cancer-ridden friend goes into remission, or a baby with a rubber band in it's throat didn't just have a good doctor look down there; it was a "miracle" brought on my prayer (thank the godz that that doc did have the common sene and logic to look there, BTW.
so now you're claiming that God didn't bring on the Hiatian disaaster? Or the later one in Chile, Or that massive tsunami two years ago that paled the recent Haitian death toll into the shadows? What, He
didn't make the tectonic plates move then either?
And yet, when explaining how the Rockies or the Grand Canyon arose in just a few months (
), I've been told, with great dismissive arrogance and distain that my years of geological grad school and field experience mean
nothing, and that it was, in fact, done in an instant by God, as he shifted them durned plates around. "POOF"! There! Done and Done!
So which is it? Do we only give god accolades when the general "
sitch" is to man's apparent advantage? That it's perhaps Satan who always beats God to the punch whenever something bad happens?
Trouble is, if you look at it all,
dispassionately* and
unambiguously*, you can
only come to the well-supported conclusion that there's literally NO evidence for any supernatural god. Its ALWAYS spiritually oriented humans reading into something, exactly what they want to believe.
Science notwithstanding. We think about some puzzling event or condition, we
hypothesize, we present several possible
credible and
rational alternatives that have been bounced off many scholars in their chosen area of special expertise, and then we go see what the collectible, reproducible evidence and data best supports.
Then, over time, with growing and fully supporting rational supporting evidence, we develop a "theory", which is NOT a wild guess as the Christian literature likes to stupidly assert.
["Evolution is only a THEORY!"]
And if the evidence does NOT support our hypothesis, we readily let it go, and try
other hypotheses. We don't feverishly cling to the failed ideas, unlike Christian 'scientists", "biblical adventurers" or "Biblical archeologists" (
snort...).
It does seem that "
Proof" means entirely different things to science versus religion. Don't you agree?
So please: un-confuse me,
allen. If your god didn't "do" Haiti, then...
whodunnit when it's bad? God's off the hook, always? How convenient when you're trying to "sell" him, huh?
Well, have a good night folks.