Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The fact that this man gets elected to a judicial post condemns the voters of the state as supporters of institutionalized, unconstitutional Dominionism.
The fact that this man gets elected to a judicial post condemns the voters of the state as supporters of institutionalized, unconstitutional Dominionism.
The voters of the state elected him.
The fact that this man gets elected to a judicial post condemns the voters of the state as supporters of institutionalized, unconstitutional Dominionism.
The fact that this man gets elected to a judicial post condemns the voters of the state as supporters of institutionalized, unconstitutional Dominionism.
So what does Obama's election condemn his electors as?
So what does Obama's election condemn his electors as?
con·demn
transitive verb
1
: to declare to be reprehensible, wrong, or evil usually after weighing evidence and without reservation
2
a : to pronounce guilty : convict
b : sentence, doom
3
: to adjudge [u]unfit for use or consumption[/U
Given that right-wingers prefer callous disregard for others and other antisocial behaviors, it isn't surprising for them to feel threatened by civic responsibility, consideration of those less fortunate in society, justice for the marginalized, etc. If it isn't about fostering greater comfort and luxury for the people they like, right-wingers hate it.
It is telling that so many here want a man removed from the bench for expressing his convictions about the Judeo-Christian founding principles of our Constitution. He did not say this from the bench. It is clear who represents the real threat to the 1st Amendment, and it is not Judge Moore.
It is telling that so many here want a man removed from the bench for expressing his convictions about the Judeo-Christian founding principles of our Constitution. He did not say this from the bench. It is clear who represents the real threat to the 1st Amendment, and it is not Judge Moore.
I think it is clear that citizens voicing their disapproval of a government official is a perfect example of the 1st amendment working. That's especially true when it is a government official showing a blatant misunderstanding of the parts of the law which apply to them doing their job.
But I guess we should ignore those facts because he has Jesus on his side which means he can do no wrong
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How long will the dodging continue?
