Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why must Chinese history be in support Noah's event in order for it to be true? Where's your logic?
Huh??? See post 61.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawkins
So you won't be able to provide even a single book which is said to be written more than 2000 years ago, then to point out which section/chapter/book is supported by facts.
No, of course not. Books did not exist 2000 years ago.
Quote:
Moreover, like I said you can debunk almost every such a book the same way as one did to Josephus' works.
No, you can't. Perhaps you might like to think about it for a while before you ram your foot even deeper into your mouth.
...and I notice that you made no comment on what the worlds foremost authority on Josephus said about the T.F.
Yes. Wilful ignorance is worn as a badge of honer with theists.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
