Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-18-2018, 10:45 AM
 
12,595 posts, read 6,655,152 times
Reputation: 1350

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nateswift View Post
And the point is still that there is a good basis for the consideration of "informed consent," what is needed is to recognize when it applies.
No...there are only opinions about that. The "basis" is subjective, at best.
I know of a case where a very promiscuous hottie 16 year old high school girl, that had a score of partners and had sex hundreds of times, set her sights on a 18 year old nerdy virgin guy that got a full scholarship to an Ivy League school. She fully admitted that she wanted to get pregnant by him so she could live as the partner of a guy who was the son of well-to-do Drs, and was going to be a Dr himself.
He had never had sex before and she seduced him. Yet they still busted him as a rapist based upon the arbitrary and subjective "basis" that he was an "adult" and she was "underage".
For most of human history females were Mothers in their early teens. Were they all "raped"?
If this kinda stuff keeps up they will be busting parents for "unlawful imprisonment" for grounding their high school aged children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-18-2018, 12:07 PM
 
28,122 posts, read 12,608,522 times
Reputation: 15341
Quote:
Originally Posted by GldnRule View Post
No...there are only opinions about that. The "basis" is subjective, at best.
I know of a case where a very promiscuous hottie 16 year old high school girl, that had a score of partners and had sex hundreds of times, set her sights on a 18 year old nerdy virgin guy that got a full scholarship to an Ivy League school. She fully admitted that she wanted to get pregnant by him so she could live as the partner of a guy who was the son of well-to-do Drs, and was going to be a Dr himself.
He had never had sex before and she seduced him. Yet they still busted him as a rapist based upon the arbitrary and subjective "basis" that he was an "adult" and she was "underage".
For most of human history females were Mothers in their early teens. Were they all "raped"?
If this kinda stuff keeps up they will be busting parents for "unlawful imprisonment" for grounding their high school aged children.
I had a female friend in high school that seduced a court social worker, so she could get out of being punished for truancy related problems, she was 15/16 at the time, he was in his late 20s...they were never discovered and it just ended mutually, she ultimately got what she wanted and she was definitely the aggressor/initiator. This girl liked to brag about this feat among her friends, she was quite proud of the fact she had this power over adult men.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2018, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Southern Oregon
17,071 posts, read 10,926,004 times
Reputation: 1874
Quote:
Originally Posted by GldnRule View Post
No...there are only opinions about that. The "basis" is subjective, at best.
I know of a case where a very promiscuous hottie 16 year old high school girl, that had a score of partners and had sex hundreds of times, set her sights on a 18 year old nerdy virgin guy that got a full scholarship to an Ivy League school. She fully admitted that she wanted to get pregnant by him so she could live as the partner of a guy who was the son of well-to-do Drs, and was going to be a Dr himself.
He had never had sex before and she seduced him. Yet they still busted him as a rapist based upon the arbitrary and subjective "basis" that he was an "adult" and she was "underage".
For most of human history females were Mothers in their early teens. Were they all "raped"?
If this kinda stuff keeps up they will be busting parents for "unlawful imprisonment" for grounding their high school aged children.
As I said, "what is needed is to recognize when it applies."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2018, 01:35 PM
 
12,595 posts, read 6,655,152 times
Reputation: 1350
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateswift View Post
As I said, "what is needed is to recognize when it applies."
So, since that is your "moral standard" on the issue...**Being "informed" enough to be able to reasonably give consent**....let me ask you this:
Since so many nowadays are sexually experienced by the age of 13 or 14...are you cool with somebody like that, fully understanding and desiring what they were doing, having sex with any other that understood in the same way, regardless of age?
What about two young virgins in a marriage arranged by the parents, as has been very common in this world?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2018, 01:52 PM
 
12,595 posts, read 6,655,152 times
Reputation: 1350
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstevens62 View Post
I had a female friend in high school that seduced a court social worker, so she could get out of being punished for truancy related problems, she was 15/16 at the time, he was in his late 20s...they were never discovered and it just ended mutually, she ultimately got what she wanted and she was definitely the aggressor/initiator. This girl liked to brag about this feat among her friends, she was quite proud of the fact she had this power over adult men.
How about that?
But "The Law" would claim he was raping her.
A very sexually experienced 15/16 year old is automatically, by law, being raped by someone the age of that social worker...even if the older person was completely sexually naive.
It shows how subjective and arbitrary "moral codes" and laws that support them really are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2018, 02:38 PM
 
Location: West Virginia
16,677 posts, read 15,684,725 times
Reputation: 10929
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak80 View Post
Does an Invisible Sky Monster really watch you have sex and/or care how you do it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaptistFundie View Post
I've tried to give you the benefit of the doubt. But you never fail to amaze me at the level of crass, obnoxious, bigoted remarks. I'm done.
Well, let's change what Freak said this way: "Does an omniscient God really watch you have sex and/or care how you do it?"

Want to answer now, or is that still crass, obnoxious, and bigoted?
__________________
Moderator posts are in RED.
City-Data Terms of Service: //www.city-data.com/terms.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2018, 02:39 PM
 
5,912 posts, read 2,606,392 times
Reputation: 1049
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2018, 02:40 PM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,605 posts, read 84,838,467 times
Reputation: 115156
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak80 View Post
Does an Invisible Sky Monster really watch you have sex and/or care how you do it?
Your fantasies and role-playing are between you and your partner, "Freak".
__________________
Moderator posts are in RED.
City-Data Terms of Service: //www.city-data.com/terms.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2018, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Southern Oregon
17,071 posts, read 10,926,004 times
Reputation: 1874
Quote:
Originally Posted by GldnRule View Post
So, since that is your "moral standard" on the issue...**Being "informed" enough to be able to reasonably give consent**....let me ask you this:
Since so many nowadays are sexually experienced by the age of 13 or 14...are you cool with somebody like that, fully understanding and desiring what they were doing, having sex with any other that understood in the same way, regardless of age?
What about two young virgins in a marriage arranged by the parents, as has been very common in this world?
"Informed consent" would mean aware of all the remifications. I doubt that a 13 year old would be, but it is possible. As for arranged marriages, why would I consider that any differently?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2018, 06:18 PM
 
12,595 posts, read 6,655,152 times
Reputation: 1350
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateswift View Post
"Informed consent" would mean aware of all the remifications. I doubt that a 13 year old would be, but it is possible. As for arranged marriages, why would I consider that any differently?
So...if a 13 year old was "aware of all the ramifications", and was fully consenting and desirous of having sex with someone in their 50s, you would then see that as "morally acceptable"...since it met your "moral standard"? In your opinion, of course.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top