Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
At least it's a better attempt, although not as funny, as Mickiel. Remember him and his 100 proofs of god that read like a dictionary?
Just one of several threads …..//www.city-data.com/forum/relig...roofs-god.html
Spiros is essentially attempting to preach the Gospel, by using the old tried and ever failing method of pointing to favorded passages in the NT, and expecting them to uphold his/her position. At some point it should begin to dawn on him that most of us here are every bit as knowledgeable of the NT as he his, if not more so. Or her.
Spiros... inform us of your gender.
As is often the case, no information is given, but it would be useful to know so we imagine a Full skirt of an appropriate colour to accompany the inevitable impending Flounce.
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold
At least it's a better attempt, although not as funny, as Mickiel. Remember him and his 100 proofs of god that read like a dictionary?
Just one of several threads …..//www.city-data.com/forum/relig...roofs-god.html
I'd forgotten that one. Maybe I was wrong to say that the quality of apologetics has declined - we don't see garbage of that poor quality these days. The garbage is relatively good.
At least it's a better attempt, although not as funny, as Mickiel. Remember him and his 100 proofs of god that read like a dictionary?
Just one of several threads …..//www.city-data.com/forum/relig...roofs-god.html
I read his first 'proof'. Not very convincing.
Quote:
The first proof of God is " Consciousness", only Consciousness can breed Consciousness. Let me say that none of the proofs of God have evolution, they are original and consistent, they have continuity.
Consciousness is a result of Consciousness, it could not have originated from " Unconsciousness", or magically induced things which began from nothing. It is impossible for Consciousness to have evolved from unconscious chemicals and matter. Evolutionist thrive on the origin of Life, coming from things that were first dead, because their theory is dead.
It's like - what the ..... How can anyone make the statement "It is impossible for Consciousness to have evolved from unconscious chemicals and matter." Impossible? How the hell would they know? Which of course leaves with that irritation question of where the original consciousness came from in the first place. And he ruled out "magically induced things which began from nothing" which is exactly what he thinks his original consciousness did.
But I thank him for raising this point. I become keenly aware that, without theist claims being posted, we atheists have nothing to talk about.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How can anyone make the statement "It is impossible for Consciousness to have evolved from unconscious chemicals and matter." Impossible? How the hell would they know? 
Which of course leaves with that irritation question of where the original consciousness came from in the first place. And he ruled out "magically induced things which began from nothing" which is exactly what he thinks his original consciousness did. 
