science and religion (translation, mythology, Muslims, Catholic)

[Petunia 100]

Originally Posted by Good4Nothin

Richard Dawkins is one example. All his followers are examples. Probably most atheists have very deep feelings against religion. I call that devout. You can look up the definition.

Having deep feelings against religion is not what makes one an atheist. We may as well start affixing other titles such as gourmet atheists, ambidextrous atheists, etc.

[gabfest]

Originally Posted by Petunia 100

Having deep feelings against religion is not what makes one an atheist. We may as well start affixing other titles such as gourmet atheists, ambidextrous atheists, etc.

It's only a matter of time. Some people are simply fascinated with themselves.

[Petunia 100]

Originally Posted by Good4Nothin

I never said it should not be self-correcting. I said that science worshipers believe it is infallible because it is self correcting.

But never mind, people who are trying not to understand will never understand.

But, who are these science worshipers? And, are there any here? If not, why bring them up constantly?

Also, something which is infallible would never need correcting.

[TroutDude]

G4N is confused.

[gabfest]

Originally Posted by Petunia 100

But, who are these science worshipers? And, are there any here? If not, why bring them up constantly?

Also, something which is infallible would never need correcting.

Why would a person who hates alcohol hang out in a liquor store all day?

[Petunia 100]

Originally Posted by gabfest

Why would a person who hates alcohol hang out in a liquor store all day?

So you're saying no, there aren't any here. I think you are correct.

[gabfest]

Originally Posted by Petunia 100

So you're saying no, there aren't any here. I think you are correct.

No. I was asking a question.

[Harry Diogenes]

Originally Posted by Petunia 100

What is a devout atheist? How can one show deep religous feeling towards one's lack of religous belief?

It is to imply that we are not rational, not open to new ideas.

It is the usual argument for those who's arguments have been refuted.

[Harry Diogenes]

Originally Posted by Good4Nothin

I never said it should not be self-correcting. I said that science worshipers believe it is infallible because it is self correcting.

Yes, you was caught moving the goal posts.

Originally Posted by Good4Nothin

But never mind, people who are trying not to understand will never understand.

Yes, you DO insist on inventing dishonest excuses.

[Harry Diogenes]

Originally Posted by Good4Nothin

Richard Dawkins is one example. All his followers are examples. Probably most atheists have very deep feelings against religion. I call that devout. You can look up the definition.