Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Massimo Pigliucci, who has debated Gish five times, noted that Gish ignores evidence contrary to his religious beliefs.[10] Others have accused Gish of stonewalling arguments with fabricated facts or figures Duane Gish - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Par for the course then for a creation 'scientist'.
You rely on such a scientific peer reviewed writing as wikipedia so much!
The man wrote the references in that article to evolutionists' own writings about the Big Bang Theory being collapsed. Go check out the articles in the papers he referenced, and stop attacking the messengers with wikipedia, which anyone at all may edit. Maybe even you, yourself, have edited wikipedia,and are quoting yourself from there, for all I know!
I cannot explain the working of my DVD player to my very intelligent cat, Dottie The Wonder Cat (check out her glowing eyes in my profile album!).
She just doesn't "get it". Why not? It's right there, and I can sorta-kinda understand it? Well, her IQ, in human terms, is probably about 14. Other cats, about 8!
Obviously the feline counterpart to my very own "Bono the Wonder Beagle"!
Who believes this anywhere in the world today, much less on this forum? Baring some strange religions, that is - I'm sure there are a few in which "nothing" engendered the world/creator gods. I have reasons to doubt rifleman is a follower of one of these religions .
Do you believe that the LORD God/YHWH Elohym, created everything?
"Institute for Creation Research"? Is that your source? People who confuse biology and astronomy? Oh dear .
So was that book peer-reviewed? Does it hold any kind of scientific credibility? What Ph.D. does his author have anyway, and what position does he now hold in a scientific institution? Given that it's published by a non-scientific creationist press and that the only references to it are from creationist website, I'm unimpressed..
Darwin's peers, theologians, have reviewed his works and found them false.
Darwin held a BA in Theology, and Theologians with only a BA are his peers who have reviewed his work.
Duane Gish, Ph.D. in biochemistry, University of California, Berkeley 1953 .
He has held key positions at Berkeley, Cornell University Medical College, and The Upjohn Company, where he collaborated with former Nobel Prize winners in various projects. His interest in the creation/evolution issue grew until, in 1971, he left The Upjohn Company to join the faculty at the newly established (1970) Christian Heritage College and its research division. In 1972, the latter changed its name to the Institute for Creation Research, and Dr. Gish has served as Associate Director and Vice President since that time.
In 1972, the latter changed its name to the Institute for Creation Research, and Dr. Gish has served as Associate Director and Vice President since that time.
So in other words, instead of using the scientific method and following wherever the evidence leads them, this organization is openly admitting by their very name that their only goal is to try to find anything that might support creationism and discredit evolution. That's not what scientists do. They don't start with the point of view that they already know the answer and then go look for something to prove it's true.
So in other words, instead of using the scientific method and following wherever the evidence leads them, this organization is openly admitting by their very name that their only goal is to try to find anything that might support creationism and discredit evolution. That's not what scientists do. They don't start with the point of view that they already know the answer and then go look for something to prove it's true.
Read his own bio.....
Are you god, MontanGuy?
````
Here's a video of the subject of the big bang busted being discussed by an astronomer and New Scientist Journalist. Marcus Chown in Conversation with Fred Watson
No, I'm not. I don't believe there is such a being as God and it's my opinion that all religions, every one of them, are based on mythology.
Okay, so you are not "god". Then you are not a peer who can review the Bible -right?
Do you believe nothing created something?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
.
.