Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-05-2014, 10:04 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,464,007 times
Reputation: 9074

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Montanama View Post
Again, it's illustrative. Is this mindset indicative of "the most vulnerable among us" or of someone making a particular set of choices, finding every way they can to justify those choices, and then expect not only their basic needs be met but to be kept at a middle-class level by others who have tried everything they can to reveal alternatives and a pathway to better success?

Who is responsible for the situation?

What lifestyle should a person making such choices expect to have handed to him/her, when they have rejected every path forward?

Who is expecting a middle class level? I'm not seeing that in this thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-05-2014, 11:30 AM
 
Location: State of Being
35,879 posts, read 77,512,987 times
Reputation: 22753
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
And instead of admitting that that is our collective failure as a nation, and that perhaps we should make changes in society so everyone has access to employment that allows them to pay their own way and secure their own future, you instead see fit to spew vacuous vitriolic hatred directed at those most vulnerable in society. I think that sums up the depravity I have been repudiating right there.
I am all for more jobs. "Collective failure as a nation?" I don't even understand what that means. Spreading the blame around for lack of leadership?

Our jobs have been outsourced, our manufacturing has been shipped overseas.

My business has suffered because of these very issues.

I agree - our economy has been gutted because folks in other countries will work for pennies on the dollar. The jobs are dribbling back but with reduced wages.

My solution has been for folks to consider creating "cottage industries" where possible. In my state, thousands were put out of work because the textile and furniture industries closed operations. Now, Malaysian countries (for the most part) produce those products. It is cheaper to produce them in those countries and ship the items back here than it is to produce them here on American soil. That is really rather stunning.

I have no hatred at all to the "vulnerable in society." I am quite distressed by the economic situations I see all around me - young folks who simply cannot find decent jobs because there are none. Friends and family underemployed because they can't find a job in their field. Neighbors who are working two part time jobs, and no benefits. Not to mention children with drugged out parents or who are in prison, and the elderly relying on subsistence assistance and food banks (and whatever help they may or may not receive from their families). Mentally ill who are incapable of working/functioning. The homeless, who are caught in a maelstrom and can't scratch their way back into mainstream society.

I totally agree that everyone should be able to work. Those folks are not what is pulling down society, however. They will find a way to eek out a living, even if still relying on food stamps and subsidized housing while doing it. I have witnessed this first hand. People I know couldn't find work so they started a car detailing business, a dog walking service, a janitorial service, a power washing/window cleaning service, etc. People who CAN work and really WANT to work are desperately trying to find solutions.

What can our "government" do about businesses that relocated to China, leaving literally hundreds of thousands of people out of work -- and no way to replace that job?

The only thing the federal government can do is create more service related bureaucratic jobs within the federal government itself. When there is no budget money (save that which we continue to borrow) . . . how can "the government" hand out money to municipalities for programs that "create" work? Well, that IS what is happening! And we go further and further into debt. It is a house of cards. The projects end, people are once again out of work, plus the dollars used to pay them have become part of an impossibly large national debt.

The front end solution is to raise more tax revenue so we can PAY for the safety net. Tax revenue comes, in great part, from a working public's paychecks. But if wages have been suppressed (and they have) - then logic tells us the revenue will be decreased. It isn't the "vulnerable" who are the problem. It is our economic situation that is the problem. The portion of the public who are indolent and use the safety net as a lifestyle are only that - a portion. But the situation still remains . . . how do we continue to pay for the safety net?

Last edited by brokensky; 10-05-2014 at 11:38 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2014, 02:21 PM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,050,316 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
,


The FAIL in your reasoning is readily apparent; you either are not grasping the concept of marriageability or you are casually disregarding it.

Men who earn minimum wage in this country are generally considered inadequate as marriage material, or unmarriageable, i.e. very few have a partner to earn that second income crucial to buying a home.

"Women marry providers. Men marry anything." - Margaret Mead
To help us put all of this in perspective, what is right and good in your life/world?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2014, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,224,933 times
Reputation: 7373
Quote:
Originally Posted by marska View Post
Mica, you said,

"You can buy a home in many places in the US on minimum wage. Maybe you can’t buy a $250,000 4,400 sq ft McMansion, but you can get a 3-bedroom ranch on half acre or acre of land."

Ummmm......I'm not sure where one can buy a 3 bedroom ranch on a half acre for under $250K. And certainly a 4400 SF home will cost far more than 250 most anywhere.

What's up?
Actually, it is pretty easy to find that, how about under $100K:

http://www.realtor.com/realestateand...68-07535?row=1


This is easy to find, I can post 100+ homes fitting the description of a ranch home, with at least 3 bedrooms and on at least 1/2 acre for under $250K.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2014, 04:03 PM
 
17,401 posts, read 11,980,893 times
Reputation: 16155
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
,


The FAIL in your reasoning is readily apparent; you either are not grasping the concept of marriageability or you are casually disregarding it.

Men who earn minimum wage in this country are generally considered inadequate as marriage material, or unmarriageable, i.e. very few have a partner to earn that second income crucial to buying a home.

"Women marry providers. Men marry anything." - Margaret Mead
Garbage. Look around and you'll see that is someone out there for everyone. Even losers seem to find a mate. That mate might be a loser like themself, but it is a mate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2014, 07:14 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,173,997 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
For the millions living near the poverty level during their adult lives, what's suppose to change when they hit their 60's plus?
It only takes one 40 Ounce and the hangovers last longer.

Aging....

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2014, 09:06 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,173,997 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgirl View Post
With this, now we're getting someplace. Enough of the polishing fingernails on the lapel. This is a societal problem.
"Society" is an artificial construct.

Community is both real and necessary, but Society is not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgirl View Post
If the subject as posed is occurring now, what, sociologists would ask, is the general upshot for now as well as the projection to the next generation, which affects our kids and grandkids and society as a whole. What will happen to humanity in the Western World as we move further toward globalization.
There is an high probability it will collapse just as many other empires and civilizations collapsed.

Since you mentioned sociologists, your Western World consists of the Anglo-World, and then Continental Europe --- the non-Slav Western Europeans. Those are two separate sufficiently distinct Worlds -- if for no other reason than they are homogenous nation-States (Europe) vs heterogeneous country-States (US, UK, Australia, New Zealand and Canada) --- which will react very differently to external stimuli.


Let me explain how your world works.

Every civilization progresses through levels of economic development, starting with the Zero Level (Agriculture), 1st Level (Natural Resources), 2nd Level (Heavy Industry), 3rd Level (Clean Industry), 4th Level (Technology) and 5th Level (R&D).

Presumably, in the latter stages/phases of your 5th Level R&D Economy, you'll develop the technology for intra-stellar travel. Your 6th Level Economy then is Natural Resources acquired from planets, planetoids, asteroids and moons. Your 7th Level Economy would be Heavy Industry based on the resources that you are extracting, and so on.

Now that you understand that, wages/salaries are related to the level of economic development. Let's look at real world examples.

It's 1898 --- Batalog in the Philippines gets paid $0.25/day; Pedro in Cuba gets paid; $0.30/day; Jane and Joe in the US get paid $0.30/day to $0.60/day, depending on where in the US they live (Alabama, Ohio, Kentucky, Utah, Montana, Indiana etc etc etc), and what exactly they are doing (ie picking tobacco, walking beans, detassling corn, herding livestock, baling hay, etc etc etc).

Slave wages?

Nope, sorry, those are the appropriate wages for that Economic Level, and that is based on mathematics and not sanctimonious bigotry.

So, Ndela earns $0.03/hour which is the minimum wage in Sierra Leone (about $0.24 to $0.30 per day).

Slave wages?

Nope, sorry, those are the appropriate wages for that Economic Level, and that is based on mathematics and not sanctimonious bigotry.

But it's 2014!

Sorry, those are the appropriate wages for that Economic Level, and that is based on mathematics and not sanctimonious bigotry.

Batalog the Filipino now gets paid $0.60/hour.

Slave wages?

Nope, sorry,....and not sanctimonious bigotry.

All Capital is subject to the Laws of Physics: no Capital can ever be in two places at the same time.

Capital -- in this instance Cash, Credit, Wealth, Profits, Natural Resources -- either stays in the Philippines, where it expands the infrastructure with electric power generation stations and an electrical grid, plus a telephone system raising the Standard of Living for Filipinos, or.....

the Capital flows to the US, where it expands the infrastructure with electric power generation stations and an electrical grid, plus a telephone system raising the Standard of Living for Americans.

Get it?

Now, Lather, Rinse, Repeat for ~84 different foreign States that were raped and robbed by Americans.

Fast-forward from 1898 to 1958.....Pedro Jr in Cuba is still only getting paid $0.30/day like his father.

Why?

I just explained why.

Capital either stays in Cuba, where it expands the infrastructure and raises the Standard of Living for Cubans, or.....

the Capital flows to the US, where it expands the infrastructure and raises the Standard of Living for Americans.

Get it?

Americans pressured Batista to grant clemency to prisoners involved in the fire-bombing of an army barracks. That included Castro, whom Americans invited to Mexico for purposes of recruiting Castro to overthrow Batista. Americans assign CIA agent Frank Sturgis as principal case officer.

When Castro gains power, and tries to stop the rape and robbery of Cubans, Americans label him as a "commie" and spend the next 50 years trying to murder him in cold blood.

Same thing in the Philippines.

Americans robbed every penny from Batalog's pockets, and every kernel of rice from his mouth. When Batalog dared to complain, or if his leaders rose up against the puppet-dictators Americans appointed to lord over and oppress Filipinos denying them the very rights Americans cherish so dearly, Americans gunned them down in the streets like animals. Aquino would be a good example.

And now Americans have the gall to curse Batalog because he only makes $0.60/hour, and Rajiv in India is buying goods from Batalog instead of buying them from Fat-Union-Type-II-Diabetes-healthcare-resource-sucking-Fred who makes $35.00/hour.

Same thing in Mexico. Americans invaded Mexico, overthrew the government, and murdered Mexicans in cold blood, because some Mexicans wanted a little bit of Capital to stay in Mexico to expand the infrastructure and raise the Standard of Living for Mexicans.

Fast-forward to 1939, and FDR is so angry he's ready to fly out of his wheel-chair and run to Mexico City to strangle President Cardenas.

Why?

Because the only way President Cardenas could stop Americans from raping and robbing Mexican Capital while causing the fewest number of Mexicans to be murdered in cold blood was to nationalize all natural resources, including the oil and natural gas fields.

FDR was madder than hell, because he needed that Capital to pay for the TVA and the Rural Electrification Program and all of his other silly socialist nonsense.

See, without raping and robbing all those countries of their Capital, Americans would have no Capital to expand the electrical grid, and to finance 50,000+ telephone company start-ups in 1917 --- and those are just the telephone companies that had more than $5,000 1917 US Dollars in revenues, plus your interstate highway system and everything else that you have that you think you earned but didn't earn at all.

Just think how terrible the Great Depression would have been, if America had not been raping and robbing other countries of their Capital.

Same with Honduras.

Americans sent my battalion there in June, July and August 1989 to ensure there would be enough Capital for Americans to have Cable-TV.

So, I hear things. It's not that I don't trust the people I'm hearing this stuff from, it's just that I have to see this for myself.

I go out with some of the line companies/platoons and we're escorting "Suits" around who are terrorizing these poor villagers. You people have no freaking clue what poverty is. How many hours per week do you spend getting water? That's what I thought. As you might imagine, the reports I filed did not go over well with the chain of command or other agencies. I got transferred to a unit that ended up in Panama to clean up the mess made by Bush the Elder when he was dictator of the Criminally Insane Agency, and then onto Iraq to clean up the mess he and the Neo-Trotskyites made there.

Anyway, fast-forward 20 years to July 2009, and Obama the Peace President illegally overthrows the Honduran government to ensure that Capital would continue to flow into the US so that Americans can have iPhones and NetFlix.

What kind of person is Obama? At the end of the day, just another jack-booted thug willing to commit murder for a Starter Jacket or iPhone.

So, that's the process of Americanization: raping and robbing the peoples of foreign States of all of their Capital to increase the Standard of Living for Americans....who are, um, exceptionally special.

Bretton Woods didn't help.

It's bad enough that Americans were raping and robbing the peoples of the Caribbean, Central and South America, plus the South Pacific --- I'm guessing everyone forgot your colonization of China....the Chinese haven't. Then Americans came to view WW II as "to the victor goes the spoils" and license for you to run around the Middle East and North Africa on a murder spree raping and robbing them of Capital.

Globalization is the exact opposite.

The sole driver of Globalization is BRICS. America plays no role, except that of spoiler, reacting to what BRICS is doing.


When BRICS goes into a country, BRICS does not rape and rob the country of its Capital.

BRICS assumes a fair share -- 50%-60% -- and the balance -- 40%-50% -- remains in-country, where it is used to expand the infrastructure and to raise the Standard of Living for the peoples there. BRICS even re-invests a small percentage of fair share back into the country.

This process moves the States from the ZERO Level Economy to the 1st Level Economy to the 2nd Level Economy and so on.

Contrast that with Americanization which results in the economic progression of States being blocked, hindered and hampered, so that they remain in a perpetual ZERO Level Economy.

The progression through the economic levels results in an increased Standard of Living. That in turn creates Demand-stress, with the end-result being higher prices for commodities.

The Laws of Economics will move to block or retard the over-consumption of any commodity. The Laws of Economics do that by forcing higher prices to the point that consumers are priced-out and can no longer consume the stressed commodity.

And so we have our sanctimonious bigots screaming that minimum wage has not kept pace with Inflation and therefore, the minimum wage should be raised.

See how totally irresponsible that is?

Where is the logic in enabling and encouraging people to over-consume commodities that are already Demand-stressed?

Anyway, Globalization is a process that will continue beyond your deaths, to the end of this Century and on into the next Century.

Unless you are prepared to murder 1.5 Billion Chinese, 1 Billion Indians, 1 Billion Slavs and Turks, and 1 Billion Africans, there is no possible way for you to stop the process of Globalization.

For the US specifically, it is a double-edged razor.

In addition to a declining Standard of Living resulting from Globalization, your strangle-hold on Capital will be broken, and you will lose that, causing your Standard of Living to decrease that much faster. Eventually, BRICS is going to show up in Central America and liberate the El Salvadorans, Nicaraguans, Guatemalans, Hondurans and Panamanians from American tyranny and oppression.

Obama's (and Hillary's) illegal over-throw of the Honduran government was the 14th time since 1898 that Americans have oppressed Hondurans in order to continue raping and robbing them of Capital. 25 years since I was there, the people in those villages still don't have running water or electricity or roads.

BRICS will do more for them in 30 days than Americans have done in 100+ years.


Which brings us back to Ndela.

She's making $0.03/hour, and her wages will double about every 10 years or so, since she is in a developing-State......wages do not double in post-Industrialized States.

Figure around 2060, she'll be making maybe $0.45/hour to $0.60/hour and ready to run her MAZAK machine competing against Fat Union-turd Fred making $35.00/hour.

Who do you think will win that battle?

Fred's going to lose his job, uh, assuming Khan the Turk or Rajiv the Indian didn't already take his job.



Revenues = #Workers * Collective Wages * Tax Rate

From our 6th Grade Math we know that if we reduce any one of the factors, the resultant is reduced as well.

Your wages will stagnate/decline for the rest of this Century, meaning that revenues for Social Security and Medicare will continually decline --- and then some morons want to shove a universal healthcare system down everyone's throat.

The #Workers will decline as well. Once India moves into the 2nd Level, you'll be losing jobs. China will start eroding your 3rd Level Economy, causing job losses there. The Turks are moving into the 1st Level Economy, and sub-Saharan Africa is moving into the latter stages of the Zero Level Economy.

About 20 years after that, China will be taking your 4th Level Economy jobs, India will be taking your 3rd Level Economy jobs that China didn't take, and then the Turks in Central Asia will be moving into the 2nd Level Economy, while sub-Saharan Africa will be moving toward the middle and later phases of the 1st Level.

No matter what you do, this is going to end badly for you all, but end happily for the other 2/3 of the World....who have suffered your indignation for decades and decades to satisfy your special exceptionalism.


Over the next 12-15 years, $5 to $7 TRILLION is coming out of your economy for Social Security and Medicare. I don't care if you increase the payroll taxes or slash benefits or both, that money is gone....and it will be very painful for everyone, and cause more job losses.

Stagnant/declining wages reduce disposable income, and the typical response is for people to reduce their contributions to 401(k)/pension plans. That reduces the available Capital for your economy, perhaps not much, but it's a reduction nonetheless. I don't profess to be knowledgeable in investments, but those who do not understand the mechanics of Americanization and Globalization, should probably not be investing. That's a good way to end up with little to nothing.

And then savings, well, if Americans save money, then you lose jobs.


No matter what you do, you are all utterly hopelessly screwed.

The Silent Generation and the Boomer Generation are not the cause of this --earlier Generations did this -- but they did wittingly or unwittingly perpetuate it, as did the Tweeners and Generation X-Box and Generation Whine.

100% of the votes cast by everyone were wrong 100% of the time.

That's spilt milk, so no sense in finger-pointing.

In order to solve any problem, you must first have an excellent grasp of how the problem evolved.

Now that you understand the mechanics involved as it relates to the economy and economics and such, you can clearly see that this problem has no resolution: it cannot be resolved to your satisfaction (meaning that there is no possible way to maintain the present Life-Style and Standard of Living to which people have falsely become accustomed).

You need to work on dealing with a lesser Standard of Living and doing that in a way that is palatable to everyone, to the extent that you can, and once you arrive there, move forward.


Assume for a moment, that America was as benevolent as BRICS. Where would America be, if you only took half of the Capital out of those States?

Your Standard of Living would be about mid to late 1960s.

For those who don't get it, 1974 was the first year that a majority of American households --- 6 out of 10 --- had 2 cars.

Good Luck with that....

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2014, 10:44 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,173,997 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by anifani821 View Post
I am all for more jobs. "Collective failure as a nation?" I don't even understand what that means. Spreading the blame around for lack of leadership?
Comrade, you are not a nation and never have been. You are a federal republic and a country.

Those people who don't understand should probably quit their jobs and go back to high school to government class.

Quote:
Originally Posted by anifani821 View Post
Our jobs have been outsourced, our manufacturing has been shipped overseas.

My business has suffered because of these very issues.
Yeah, so?

Give me one reason why Rajiv in India should buy Made in USA instead of Made in Philippines or Made in Romania.

Because, you see, if you cannot give a reason then your complaint is invalid and nonsensical.


Quote:
Originally Posted by anifani821 View Post
I agree - our economy has been gutted because folks in other countries will work for pennies on the dollar. The jobs are dribbling back but with reduced wages.
That is totally wrong.

Those are not slave wages.

If you have issues with Vlad in Romania getting paid $1.40/hour minimum wage, or Batalog in the Philippines making $0.60/hour, or Ndela in Sierra Leone who gets paid the minimum wage of $0.03/hour then you don't understand Economics.

Your inability to understand Economics is the reason your business has suffered.

Quote:
Originally Posted by anifani821 View Post
In my state, thousands were put out of work because the textile and furniture industries closed operations. Now, Malaysian countries (for the most part) produce those products. It is cheaper to produce them in those countries and ship the items back here than it is to produce them here on American soil. That is really rather stunning.
Yes, it's exhilarating, isn't it?

For decades you raped and robbed them of their Capital, and now all that you stole is flowing back into their country.

Funny how the Laws of Economics work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by anifani821 View Post
I totally agree that everyone should be able to work.
That is fantasy, not reality. It certainly isn't Economics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by anifani821 View Post
What can our "government" do about businesses that relocated to China, leaving literally hundreds of thousands of people out of work -- and no way to replace that job?
Absolutely nothing.

Seriously, I'm shocked that your business has lasted this long. I can only imagine you're flying by the seat of your pants.

Allow me to explain the Facts-of-Life to you.

$5 Profit = $5 Profit.

Right?

Is there anyone who disagrees?

Okay, there are 400 Million Americans and snotty Canadians and braggart Australians.

400 Million * $5 = $2,000 Million in Profit

Is there anyone who disagrees?

There are 6,000 Million People in the 2nd/3rd/4th Worlds.

6,000 Million * $5 = $30,000 Million in Profit

Is there anyone who disagrees?


$30,000 Million in Profit is greater than the $2,000 Million in Profit one gets from the Anglo-World.

Is there anyone who disagrees?


Okay, then, it's crystal clear that the name of the game is to sell to the 6,000 Million people in the rest of the World. Who cares about the Anglos? Nobody. They will not be missed.

Again, that brings us back to the question: Why should Rajiv in India buy Made in USA instead of Made in Philippines or Made in Romania?

And don't forget that Rajiv sends his children to the best most expensive private schools in India, and he pays only $106.54 per year per child.

And his children will take your jobs.

Vlad can buy a house on $1.40/hour.

If you cannot buy a house on $1.40/hour, then that is your problem, not his....he's doing fine.

How much were Romanians paid in 1905?

That's a trick question. They weren't paid anything, since they were slaves and 1905 was the year that Tsar Nicolai issued an edict banning slavery.

It's a Zero Level Economy comparable to the US in the 1760s....and no, I didn't stutter.

Fast-forward a World War, a global depression and rolling recessions, another World War and then the fiasco when the US stabs King Mihai in the back and Big Brother Gheorghe arrives on the scene.

Romania in 1960 was where the US was in 1880....heavily agricultural with some mining, rock quarries, oi production.

Today, Romania is where the US was in the early 1960s.

Was there 400 cars for every 1,000 persons in the US in the 1960s?

No.

That's right, and that's why today there's only about 200 cars per 1,000 persons in Romania.

You think Ndela in Sierra Leone should be paid $7.25/hour?

What, exactly, is she going to do with that money?

Did you think she was going to shop at Macy's and then go to Starsux and look cool drinking a latte?

Those things do not exist in her world.....that's what developing-State means.

Do you even understand what you're asking? I don't think you do. I'm certain you don't.

If you want to pay those people wages that are not "slave wages" then they are going to consume at the level you consume.

What happens to the prices of everything?

They sail through the roof....you cannot win.

Every road you take leads to the same dead end.

Quote:
Originally Posted by anifani821 View Post
But the situation still remains . . . how do we continue to pay for the safety net?
You don't.

Here's what you do....

The Poorâ„¢ Turd: I want Food Stamps.
Gov Employee: Do you reside in a non-related multi-household?
The Poorâ„¢Turd: No.
Gov Employee: Then you are **DENIED ** since you have not done all that you can do. Ask not what your country can do for you, but ask what can you do for your country. Bring us proof that you reside in a non-related multi-household, and you can reapply.

....28 days later....

The Poorâ„¢Turd: I want Food Stamps.
Gov Employee: Do you reside in a non-related multi-household?
The Poorâ„¢Turd: Yes, here's a notarized copy of the lease agreement or mortgage documents and deeds proving that we share living accommodations with another household and notarized signed affidavits stating that we are not related by blood or marriage to that household.
Gov Employee: Excellent. Unfortunately you are **DENIED ** since your Disposable Income has increased due to the fact that you now share living expenses...and you can afford to pay for your own food....have a cluckety-cluck-cluck day.

See how easy that was?

Realistically...

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2014, 01:26 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,464,007 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
You don't.

Here's what you do....

The Poorâ„¢ Turd: I want Food Stamps.
Gov Employee: Do you reside in a non-related multi-household?
The Poorâ„¢Turd: No.
Gov Employee: Then you are **DENIED ** since you have not done all that you can do. Ask not what your country can do for you, but ask what can you do for your country. Bring us proof that you reside in a non-related multi-household, and you can reapply.

....28 days later....

The Poorâ„¢Turd: I want Food Stamps.
Gov Employee: Do you reside in a non-related multi-household?
The Poorâ„¢Turd: Yes, here's a notarized copy of the lease agreement or mortgage documents and deeds proving that we share living accommodations with another household and notarized signed affidavits stating that we are not related by blood or marriage to that household.
Gov Employee: Excellent. Unfortunately you are **DENIED ** since your Disposable Income has increased due to the fact that you now share living expenses...and you can afford to pay for your own food....have a cluckety-cluck-cluck day.

See how easy that was?

Realistically...

Mircea

??? I reside in a non-related multi-household, yet I do not share living expenses.

The resident drunk in the house rents the house (for $N) from the owner, who is his buddy and who is content to collect rent checks without actively managing the property.

The resident drunk then lives in one bedroom and manages the property, renting out the other bedrooms at some fraction of $N and collecting $1.5N at full occupancy.

So I am getting neither the economy of scale nor the increased disposable income one would expect from living in a non-related multi-household.

Even so, my gross income disqualifies me from food stamps, making my disposable income irrelevant thereto.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2014, 02:36 AM
 
106,691 posts, read 108,880,922 times
Reputation: 80174
we had a choice in my company , close down our manufacturing facility here because we couldn't win bids against cheaper labor or shift gears.

so we shifted gears. we made our castings in china, designed ,engineered ,assembled and tested them here in long island and went on to provide 120 jobs in ny and ohio.

today the tide is changing , labor in china is becoming quite expensive as wage inflation sets in . we are down to about a 5% spread now with china being phased out and manufacturing brought back here in the near future.

folks we buy foreign goods for only one reason , it represents to us the best value for our money as consumers.

a good pair of dress shoes used to cost me 150 bucks. today i get the finest shoes for 80.00.

we are a global economy and each country does something better ,cheaper and more efficiently and to think you can prop up your country because you want to make that product and sell it for more is insane thinking .

our standard of living has been elevated greatly because of the fact we all benefit from the most efficiant ways of making things.

the answer is you need to shift gears today a lot. the buggy whip manufactoters and shoe repairmen are just about gone today as the world changes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:59 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top