Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
3 and a half years, atleast 3 different pm's, 2 general elections and the deal to initiate withdrawal isn't even initiated let alone a clear view of how the trade deal is going to pan out.
3 and a half years, atleast 3 different pm's, 2 general elections and the deal to initiate withdrawal isn't even initiated let alone a clear view of how the trade deal is going to pan out.
You got to admit simple that isn't.
The goal is real simple.
The complications are that people are trying everything they can to remain while claiming we've left.
And ultimately we were in for 2 years after Article 50 was filed, because that's the process.
I've said this before and it's probably the best way of handling Brexit. Right after we filed, we should have told the EU we were not available for 6-12 months preparing for Brexit, and we'd only discuss terms after we'd squared away no deal.
Instead everyone wet their pants and ran around like chicken littles, that's what caused the complications. A bunch of losers in everything but politics crying in wet diapers because the majority voted for the wrong result.
I've said this before and it's probably the best way of handling Brexit. Right after we filed, we should have told the EU we were not available for 6-12 months preparing for Brexit, and we'd only discuss terms after we'd squared away no deal.
Instead everyone wet their pants and ran around like chicken littles, that's what caused the complications. A bunch of losers in everything but politics crying in wet diapers because the majority voted for the wrong result.
So the answer was to completely rewrite the EUs internal rules and government didn't have a clue or a plan what to do?
Your not convincing me what simple is.
Also the goal is in no way clear, leaving the EU is mearly an action, what is the desired end result?
Case: the only way you can be sure the first referendum was right is to have a second referendum to confirm the fact. Otherwise you'll always be left guessing.
A very big difference indeed. The original being built around lies and misinformation and poor defence.
A second vote would rid all complaints from either side with arguments from both sides pretty much in the open if not fully understood.
A very big difference indeed. The original being built around lies and misinformation and poor defence.
A second vote would rid all complaints from either side with arguments from both sides pretty much in the open if not fully understood.
In a nutshell!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
