Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-29-2017, 09:46 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,506,965 times
Reputation: 15184

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Razza94 View Post
I suspect this law came into being after there was problems with Jehovah's Witnesses and other kooks preventing their children from receiving urgent medical care.

My dad told me a story about a kid in his school who had a curable condition, but died because his parents wouldn't allow him to receive medical treatment.
Makes sense, but the hospital wasn't offering any additional care. Just saying it would preserve "dignity".

 
Old 06-29-2017, 09:47 AM
 
6,112 posts, read 3,925,140 times
Reputation: 2243
It's a weird case, apparently the alternate treatment being offered was far-fetched. A lot of medical experts advised the court that it was all BS.
 
Old 06-29-2017, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Leeds, UK
22,112 posts, read 29,594,102 times
Reputation: 8819
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
Maybe, but why can't the hospital let the baby go and let the parents try? The baby belongs to the parents not the hospital.
They are doing what is best for the baby, not the parents. The parents are obviously going to be very upset but this is probably for the best.
 
Old 06-29-2017, 10:43 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,506,965 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by dunno what to put here View Post
They are doing what is best for the baby, not the parents. The parents are obviously going to be very upset but this is probably for the best.
The parents are trying to find an alternate way to help the baby, the hospital isn't offering a better cure. What right do they have to stop the parents?
 
Old 06-29-2017, 10:47 AM
 
6,112 posts, read 3,925,140 times
Reputation: 2243
I don't think taking him to a quack doctor who wants to experiment on him is in the best interests of the child's welfare. Or that of the parents, who are going to be ripped off.
 
Old 06-29-2017, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Portsmouth, UK
13,486 posts, read 9,032,668 times
Reputation: 3924
The parents are desperate to save their baby, as you would be, but medical experts have told them there is no hope. They are clinging onto a miracle cure which doesn't exist. The courts have decided in favour of the baby, to end the suffering (the baby is being kept alive only by a machine) rather than the parents. The baby is a person too & as such has rights, it doesn't "belong" to the parents in the sense they can do whatever they want with it...
 
Old 06-29-2017, 11:32 AM
 
Location: London, United Kingdom
699 posts, read 369,002 times
Reputation: 281
...They're doing whatever they want to keep the baby alive though
 
Old 06-29-2017, 11:34 AM
 
Location: New York
11,326 posts, read 20,338,414 times
Reputation: 6231
What is there to lose though? I just don't think it's the court's decision to make, especially not when another hospital is willing to take the baby in.
 
Old 06-29-2017, 11:41 AM
 
Location: United Kingdom
3,147 posts, read 1,979,990 times
Reputation: 731
Leftish English morals.the same ones who agree with Euthanasia.
 
Old 06-29-2017, 11:43 AM
 
6,112 posts, read 3,925,140 times
Reputation: 2243
Quote:
Originally Posted by GymFanatic View Post
Leftish English morals.the Same ones who agree with Euthanasia.
English morals? It was the European Court of Human Rights that made the final decision.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top