Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The parents are desperate to save their baby, as you would be, but medical experts have told them there is no hope. They are clinging onto a miracle cure which doesn't exist. The courts have decided in favour of the baby, to end the suffering (the baby is being kept alive only by a machine) rather than the parents. The baby is a person too & as such has rights, it doesn't "belong" to the parents in the sense they can do whatever they want with it...
the cure may have a small chance for it to work, there's little to lose. The baby can't make decisions; the hospital decided its in the best interest of the baby to die.
I'm pro euthanasia and I think the majority of the UK now is too.
Massachusetts had a euthanasia vote and I voted no. Liable for abuse and not a decision that can be undone [yes, I'm also opposed to capital punishment]. Measure narrowly failed. Catholic Church made an effort to convince people to vote against; they still have some influence left.
For lommaren: more educated liberal areas tended to vote in favor; more working-class & non-white areas opposed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.