Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-18-2011, 05:03 PM
 
2,017 posts, read 5,649,684 times
Reputation: 1680

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
No PR release would not have been in the best interest of the organization. The organization is appropriately doing damage control for their own good.

You can try to contact the media and express your opinion about refusing.... but I don't think they will really care.

Bingo.

Quite frankly the company can't really say anything. The mob is NOT going to listen to them anyhow.

If we believe their statement (and according to public opinion when you read through the various comments on news sites people think the company is still full of crap) there were other reasons that the employer did not consider the request.

If the employer tries to explain those-- even in a public forum-- the chances of rational thought looking at both sides of the explanation are slim to none.

People are mad over a much larger problem. They are mad over highly publicized corporate scandals that have happened over the past decade, people are mad about the economy, losing their own jobs, unemployment, amongst a plethora of other things. This company, whether they should or should not be, are an easy whipping boy. Far easier to scream, yell, intimidate a company of approx 20 people versus a corporation that would feel no impact of some public outrage.

On the plus side in all of this from news articles it appears the woman is no longer on death's door, but her prognosis is years not months.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2011, 07:37 AM
 
372 posts, read 524,247 times
Reputation: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z3N1TH 0N3 View Post
"In recognition of their unique circumstances and level of hardship created by his wife’s illness, Haynes Management is reaching out to our former employee to determine if there is a way we can be supportive to his family during this time. This decision is consistent with our values as a family owned business and our commitment to being a responsible member of our community."
"Unique"?
"Values"?
"Family Owned?"
"Responsible"?

Gag a maggot.

Their hypocrisy is astounding and is nothing more than a desperate PR ploy generated by a company whose reputation has been damaged beyond repair by their calculated decision to eliminate any financial risk associated with Mr. Sorabella's dying wife. Period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 07:59 AM
 
Location: London
1,583 posts, read 3,686,212 times
Reputation: 1336
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
Listing competitors in the new papers, etc... would imply that the media is taking a side. That's not the purpose of the media. It is to report the news.

Customers can decide how they want wo react without being spoonfed ideas.
This, I agree with 100%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 10:40 AM
 
Location: San Antonio Texas
11,431 posts, read 19,055,186 times
Reputation: 5224
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
Wrong, wetohex. It has squat to do with a reprehensible business owner. This is a sub-human behavior problem, and no law can stop it. Just good old fashion public reaction hurting the owner where he truly cares..the bottom line.
The "problem" here is that their premiums will go sky high now that this woman has experienced this illness. I stand by my original post that we need a different type of insurance system to spread the risks around more. I worked for a small company about 2 years ago that experienced much the same thing. An employee's 10 year boy suffered a rare form of cancer. My rate as an individual shot up $90 month upon annual renewal! I could no longer afford it, so I dropped it. There is something wrong with a system that brings this burden on a business. Their premium should not be raised like this when someone gets sick.
Everyone on this forum gets angry, but is avoiding the root cause of the problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 10:55 AM
 
Location: 112 Ocean Avenue
5,706 posts, read 9,666,953 times
Reputation: 8932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yzette View Post
Unbelievable. This kind of thing should be illegal, regardless of the size of the company.

Man Gets Fired After Wife Gets Cancer - Careers Articles
https://www.city-data.com/forum/work-...-pathetic.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 12:17 PM
 
8,679 posts, read 15,306,045 times
Reputation: 15347
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedJacket View Post
[URL]https://www.city-data.com/forum/work-employment/1305546-how-pathetic.html[/URL]
D'OH! I didn't see that. Try using the article's headline or being more specific in the subject line next time, so people know what a thread is about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Philaburbia
42,072 posts, read 75,545,470 times
Reputation: 67103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Java378 View Post
Yeah, cancer patients can be dropped off at 8pm and picked up at 3Pm at some cancer wards.
Glad I'm not married to you. I shudder to think what would have happened, had I not been there, when my husband had a life-threatening reaction to his first treatment. I was the one, not the overtasked nursing staff, who noticed he needed help and quickly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lovetheduns View Post
A good chunk of people on this forum do not appear to be actual business owners-- and will more than likely never be faced with having to make a decision such as the one made here.
I'd be comfortable in predicting that many of the people on this forum can see this exact thing happening in their own jobs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yzette View Post
I think the frustration in the readers' comments come from a middle class that is sick of being treated like garbage by their employers.
Yes. We're expected to be loyal, yet are shown no loyalty. We're expected to be flexible, yet when we ask the company to be flexible, the answer is 'no.'

Quote:
I will bet the rent that things like this happened before to other people. This is just the first time in recent memory that it has garnered national attention. I would be surprised if we don't hear more stories like this.
I'd be willing to bet it happens on a daily basis.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
Listing competitors in the new papers, etc... would imply that the media is taking a side. That's not the purpose of the media. It is to report the news.
Ever heard of the op/ed page?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lovetheduns View Post
People are mad over a much larger problem. They are mad over highly publicized corporate scandals that have happened over the past decade, people are mad about the economy, losing their own jobs, unemployment, amongst a plethora of other things.
They're mad because their employers treat them like dirt ... They're afraid that a common-sense request like working flexible hours to take care of an ill spouse will cost them their jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 05:02 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,250,892 times
Reputation: 12922
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post
Ever heard of the op/ed page?
I had to look it up since I never really got into the physical paper. It appears that the op/ed page is not even written by the papers but by third party editors who express their own opinions and not of the paper... Correct me if I am wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 04:53 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,354,132 times
Reputation: 11416
With Universal Health Care, this wouldn't be a problem.
The guy will probably go bankrupt, too.
Health issues are the number 1 reason for bankruptcy in the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 01:20 PM
 
3,730 posts, read 4,649,376 times
Reputation: 3430
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post

They're mad because their employers treat them like dirt ... They're afraid that a common-sense request like working flexible hours to take care of an ill spouse will cost them their jobs.
I agree with you Ohiogirl.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top