City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
34.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Okeechobee High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Okeechobee County: | 39 |
Okeechobee: | 39 |
Okeechobee High School: | 34 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (863) 462-5025 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 47
School number: 101
School type: Senior High
District Name: OKEECHOBEE
Grade range: GRADES 10 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 462-5037
Principal: Toni Wiersma
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 16
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 79
Senate District: 17
School Web Address: http://www.okee.k12.fl.us/web.nsf
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 74% |
State average from 5 schools: | 81% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 68% |
State average from 5 schools: | 81% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 80% |
State average from 5 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 54% |
State average from 5 schools: | 62% |
Making Reading Gains OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 64% |
State average from 5 schools: | 72% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 63% |
State average from 5 schools: | 80% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 55% |
State average from 5 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 57% |
State average from 5 schools: | 78% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 515 |
State average from 5 schools: | 607 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 5 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 56% |
State average from 5 schools: | 36% |
Minority RateHere: | 22% |
State average from 5 schools: | 35% |
Region: 1
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 597 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 596 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 145
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 70% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 580
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 563
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 579
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 560
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 465 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 464 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 114
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 450
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 433
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 449
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 430
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 327 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 326 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 312
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 303
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 311
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 301
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 76% |
State average from 5 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in MathOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 62% |
State average from 5 schools: | 78% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 94% |
State average from 5 schools: | 93% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 51% |
State average from 5 schools: | 60% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 71% |
State average from 5 schools: | 70% |
Making Math GainsOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 64% |
State average from 5 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 68% |
State average from 5 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 55% |
State average from 5 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 541 |
State average from 5 schools: | 586 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 5 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 55% |
State average from 5 schools: | 32% |
Minority RateHere: | 24% |
State average from 5 schools: | 33% |
Region: 1
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 601 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 600 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 119
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 570
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 543
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 59% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 569
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 543
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 454 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 454 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 93
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 436
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 421
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 436
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 421
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 331 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 330 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 309
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 289
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 308
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 68% |
State average from 5 schools: | 79% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 60% |
State average from 5 schools: | 79% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 75% |
State average from 5 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 33% |
State average from 5 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 60% |
State average from 5 schools: | 69% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 70% |
State average from 5 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 53% |
State average from 5 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 68% |
State average from 5 schools: | 74% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 487 |
State average from 5 schools: | 579 |
Percent TestedHere: | 98% |
State average from 5 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 52% |
State average from 5 schools: | 36% |
Minority RateHere: | 24% |
State average from 5 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 632 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 631 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 168
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 607
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 578
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 607
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 579
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 481 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 480 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 127
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 463
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 443
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 462
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 443
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 33% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 326 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 325 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 311
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 297
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 310
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 297
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 30%
Meeting High Standards in Math: 73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 85%
Meeting High Standards in Science: 44%
Making Reading Gains: 42%
Making Math Gains: 75%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 42%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 69%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns: 470
Percent Tested: 96%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 38%
Minority Rate: 34%
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 454 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 445 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 432
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 24% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 429
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 419
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 283 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 277 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 270
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 31% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 265
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 118
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 13% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 201 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 199 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 193
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 14% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 192
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (92%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 24% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 25%
Meeting High Standards in Math: 66%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 75%
Making Reading Gains: 30%
Making Math Gains: 69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 26%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 291
Percent Tested: 96%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 39%
Minority Rate: 33%
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 470 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 461 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 438
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 22% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 438
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 436
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 312 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 307 (96%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 290
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 24% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 290
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 290
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 32
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 13% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 35% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 104
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 16% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 104
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 102
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 196 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 192 (95%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 179
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 15% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 181
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 179
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (88%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 71
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 69
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 16% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 70
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 27%
Meeting High Standards in Math: 66%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 78%
Making Reading Gains: 38%
Making Math Gains: 67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 38%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 314
Percent Tested: 98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 42%
Minority Rate: 32%
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1433 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 322 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 51% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 31% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 86% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1634 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 15% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 42% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 28% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 77% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1684 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 316 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 16% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 12% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 31% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 28% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 72% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1753 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 14% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 15% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 35% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 28% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 7% |
State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 70% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1825 |
State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 320 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 13% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 19% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 38% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 67% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1938 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 321 |
State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 26% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 45% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 16% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 66% |
State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 17 |
State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1969 |
State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 321 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 12% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 34% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 41% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 7% |
State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 54% |
State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2037 |
State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 320 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent PassingHere: | 73% |
State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 12% |
State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 51% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 24% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 37% |
State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 314 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 20% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 32% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 34% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 12% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 48% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 15% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 35% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 39% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 50% |
State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 316 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 20% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 30% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 39% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 50% |
State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1586 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 362 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 35% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 37% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 20% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 92% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1622 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 338 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 40% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 38% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 87% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1664 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 332 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 17% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 20% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 27% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 63% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1699 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 316 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 20% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 24% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 35% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 16% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 56% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1756 |
State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 298 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 23% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 22% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 39% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 14% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 1% |
State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 54% |
State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 1947 |
State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 334 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 16% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 26% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 16% |
State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 74% |
State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1953 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 311 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 29% |
State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 41% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 20% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 5% |
State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 66% |
State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2067 |
State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 344 |
State average: | 326 |
Percent PassingHere: | 96% |
State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 30% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 58% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 94% |
State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1415 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1678 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 02%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 59%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1702 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1700 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1840 |
State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1923 |
State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 318 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 2012 |
State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 328 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 1975 |
State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 299 |
Percent Passing: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 313 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 313 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 311 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1521 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 348 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1588 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 330 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1698 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 339 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1624 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 298 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1800 |
State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1892 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2011 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 328 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2004 |
State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 328 |
State average: | 321 |
Percent Passing: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 52
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 126
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 45
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1436 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1575 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1623 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 305 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1684 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1798 |
State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 315 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1846 |
State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 302 |
State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 2003 |
State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 327 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1948 |
State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 298 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 291 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 318 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1533 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 350 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1490 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 308 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1663 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 332 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1646 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1780 |
State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 1887 |
State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 318 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 2003 |
State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 325 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1987 |
State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 323 |
Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 54 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 638 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 640 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 155 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 669 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Informational (max 18)OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 162 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 670 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 146 |
State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale ScoreOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 684 |
State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 174 |
State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 682 |
State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 37 |
State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 707 |
State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 719 |
State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Functional (max 18)OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 8 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 41
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 257 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 27%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 46%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 178
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 263 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 26%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 59
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 308 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 53%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 1884 |
State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 292 |
State average: | 291 |
Percent Passing: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1896 |
State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 1891 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 8
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1978 |
State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 315 |
Percent Passing: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1986 |
State average: | 1939 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1934 |
State average: | 1901 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 52
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 444
Mean Scale ScoreOKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL: | 698 |
State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Median NPR: 56
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 443
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 711 |
State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Median NPR: 62
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 444
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 286 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 43%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 76%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 57%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Okeechobee, FL
- Okeechobee High School in Okeechobee, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: