Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-28-2015, 05:00 PM
 
32,026 posts, read 36,803,640 times
Reputation: 13311

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccdscott View Post
Or the state of Georgia could pony up some dedicated funding like oh...say the 48 other states do for their transit systems.

MARTA, been fighting one handed since its inception.
The state has given MARTA many financial tools.

To get a straight out grant from state government, MARTA simply needs to convince the legislature that it's in the best interest of all Georgians.

If legislators from around the state are given the ammo to support that, they can go back to the voters in their home districts and explain the situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-28-2015, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
332 posts, read 344,512 times
Reputation: 287
LOL at "straight out grant". The largest public transportation system in the state, that provides the type of impact it does, struggling to prove its worth that it needs a "grant". If Georgians can't see an expanded MARTA is in the best interests of the state -- what more do they need to see?

Public transportation is important in every state, and many states recognize that importance by providing dedicated funding.

There are a variety of ways to come up with funding sources if you really want to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 05:26 PM
 
32,026 posts, read 36,803,640 times
Reputation: 13311
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccdscott View Post
LOL at "straight out grant". The largest public transportation system in the state, that provides the type of impact it does, struggling to prove its worth that it needs a "grant". If Georgians can't see an expanded MARTA is in the best interests of the state -- what more do they need to see?
If it's that simple then why not just lay out the case in black and white? If the legislature is given the hard facts showing how much the state should put in, it's a lot easier to justify a grant to the folks back home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 05:31 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
332 posts, read 344,512 times
Reputation: 287
You're missing the point. The most important transit system in the state shouldn't have to lay out a case in black or white. I'm not saying they shouldn't due to the fragmentation of Georgia's home rule system/politics, but am I saying it is unnecessary.

I mean, CTA isn't going to the Illinois legislature to prove how important it is to Illinois. It's self-explanatory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,696,314 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by arjay57 View Post
If it's that simple then why not just lay out the case in black and white? If the legislature is given the hard facts showing how much the state should put in, it's a lot easier to justify a grant to the folks back home.
It's not that simple though. A lot of voters in this state have a very strongly rooted concept of "If I don't use it, why should I pay for it?" The politicians they vote in mirror that idea, and transit for the big city isn't something that that a farmer or small-town general store owner cares about. They don't have to deal with the traffic.

It takes more than 'just' explaining how well the agency is doing to get it funding. You have to overcome the idea that the state funding transit in Atlanta is good for the state, and not just loosing money. That's on top of the idea that Atlanta already gets way too much of the state's funds.

It's true that the state has given MARTA a few methods of funding itself, primarily in the method form of its land, but has done little to actually support the agency, any other metro transit.

I'll make a wild guess and say that the responses you'll get were MARTA to ask for funds from the state will go along the lines of,"See how fine you're doing on your own? You've got enough, now just do with what you have." The best we could realistically see in the near future would be the State allowing changes to the TSPLOST laws, and even that'll probably run into similar problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 06:33 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
9,818 posts, read 7,939,859 times
Reputation: 9991
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccdscott View Post
You're missing the point. The most important transit system in the state shouldn't have to lay out a case in black or white. I'm not saying they shouldn't due to the fragmentation of Georgia's home rule system/politics, but am I saying it is unnecessary.

I mean, CTA isn't going to the Illinois legislature to prove how important it is to Illinois. It's self-explanatory.
But don't the CTA and Metra have to BEG Springfield for money every year?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 07:10 PM
 
32,026 posts, read 36,803,640 times
Reputation: 13311
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccdscott View Post
You're missing the point. The most important transit system in the state shouldn't have to lay out a case in black or white. I'm not saying they shouldn't due to the fragmentation of Georgia's home rule system/politics, but am I saying it is unnecessary.

I mean, CTA isn't going to the Illinois legislature to prove how important it is to Illinois. It's self-explanatory.
It may seem self-explanatory to you but I doubt that it is to legislators and their constituents outside of Fulton and DeKalb.

And what's the big deal about laying out your best case? People do that all the time in business, politics and even in their own families.

Making the case with hard, irrefutable facts is a lot more persuasive -- and much more likely to result in actual funding -- than hollering on the internet about how the mean old the state of Georgia is not giving MARTA enough money.

If you're in the legislature you've got a million people beating down your door to give them money for this or that agency or program.

As the old saying goes, if you want somebody to agree with you, don't yell at them. Give them the tools they need to see it your way.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 07:44 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
9,829 posts, read 7,267,247 times
Reputation: 7790
The other big transit systems have this successful strategy they've employed over the decades, where they don't operate in a conservative southern state with a history of racism, perpetually controlled by rural-district regressives who have a bitter distaste for anything related to the city and its residents, and who oppose any kind of taxes and anything resembling public or progressive transportation. And where there's no regional planning whatsoever, and everyone refuses to pay for anything.

MARTA should really try that method sometime, then they'd get some funding and be able to expand their footprint and actually serve the population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 08:33 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
9,818 posts, read 7,939,859 times
Reputation: 9991
Quote:
Originally Posted by primaltech View Post
The other big transit systems have this successful strategy they've employed over the decades, where they don't operate in a conservative southern state with a history of racism, perpetually controlled by rural-district regressives who have a bitter distaste for anything related to the city and its residents, and who oppose any kind of taxes and anything resembling public or progressive transportation. And where there's no regional planning whatsoever, and everyone refuses to pay for anything.

MARTA should really try that method sometime, then they'd get some funding and be able to expand their footprint and actually serve the population.
LOL!!! We hardly own this, by any insane stretch of imagination. You need a trip to Illinois & Pennsylvania, ASAP.

You have no idea...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2015, 08:41 PM
 
Location: Southeast, where else?
3,913 posts, read 5,231,819 times
Reputation: 5824
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamadiddle View Post
reminds me of a song, In the year 2525...
Funny you should say that. The Alpharetta station was always planned for 2025. However, why stop,there? Push it to Forsyth as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top