Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-09-2018, 06:26 AM
 
Location: City of Atlanta
1,478 posts, read 1,725,066 times
Reputation: 1536

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cparker73 View Post
We actually have an informal understanding in my office to try to not start a meeting before 9am or after 4pm because so many people are trickling in or out at those times. We have a strong telework culture, so it's not unusual for people to start filtering out at 3pm and dialing into meetings while they're on the road. It's a great way to get paid while being stuck in traffic or the school carpool line.
Stuff like this is one reason that we have a ridiculous number of distracted driving accidents in this city. Nobody should be dialing into a meeting while driving - they should be concentrating on driving.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-09-2018, 06:52 AM
 
Location: Ono Island, Orange Beach, AL
10,744 posts, read 13,386,955 times
Reputation: 7183
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLTJL View Post
I'm not a Millennial.

Prior to 9:30 is an awful time to set a meeting because you are likely forcing people into commuter traffic who may not otherwise have to be in it. That's a jerky thing to do when you could easily make it a 10:30 meeting instead and just avoid that problem.

Obviously, this doesn't apply if your meeting is internal only for people who are already in the office. Assuming you don't have flex time and everybody arrives by that time. If some people don't usually come to work until 10am to avoid traffic, you're being a tool by asking them to come in early to accommodate you.
A lot of professions do not work this way, though. I recall many a meeting that was held way before 9:30 am and way later than 4:00 pm. It was necessary to get the work done. And, I do not recall anyone complaining about that timing. I understand exactly what you are saying; however, I just don't think that timing is realistic in many instances. 9:00 to 5:00 just oftentimes doesn't cut it. When I first started out, I was expected to be at my desk around 7:30 or 8:00 am and work until around 6:30 or 7:00 pm. Oftentimes, it would be earlier or later, depending on what was going on. It wasn't unusual to have meetings that lasted well after 6:30 or 7:00. Did I really like that? Nopers. But, it was what we did, nonetheless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2018, 10:02 AM
 
Location: Jonesboro
3,874 posts, read 4,697,874 times
Reputation: 5365
Default Intown Atlanta..

Quote:
Originally Posted by back2atl View Post
9:30 is early? That sounds like millennial talk.

East west routes in the city are terrible. 14th street drove me nuts years ago, I really feel for anyone that has to commute on it now.

As I wrote yesterday, 14th St. is a TERRIBLE spot for gridlock that got worse by a factor of multiple times as I accumulated 32 years of working adjacent to it.
Related not only specifically to the mess of 14th but which really hurts Midtown overall is the disconnected & interrupted pattern of streets found in the partial grid in that area.
An obstacle none of us would ever trade away but which is symptomatic of the "interruption" I speak of is Piedmont Park. There's nothing we'd ever want to or be able to do to change it but just as a point of analysis, think about how it's location forces anyone driving trying to gain an east to west entry into Midtown, say to the major business area near 14th & Peachtree, to either come in via 10th St. or from well to the north from the intersection of Monroe Drive @ Piedmont & then to come south via Piedmont Avenue & on into 14th St.
Similarly, there are many other smaller gaps in the street grid pattern that will come to mind if one considers how often a turn must be made at an intersection because the street does not go through into the next intersection one block over. That of course, is largely due to the fact that development often occurred in a hap hazard manner exacerbated by gaps in time as adjacent blocks were laid out & then built up.
A couple of suggestions for "What to do?" here might give hope.
There is a proposal to extend 15th st. west on beyond it's ending intersection with W. Peachtree St., an extension of which is planned to given an additional HOV access point at the Connector but which would eliminate the current problem in that all west bound traffic on 15th St. is forced to turn right & go northbound on W. Peachtree. That intersection as it now stands is truly is one of the major problematic "gaps" in the grid!
And, something done about 8 years ago on Peachtree @ 11th St. NE. was the reduction in the traffic-clogging signal light delays there as the former dog-leg nature of that intersection was eliminated via the purchase of property & the subsequent straightening out of Peachtree @ 11th St. intersection into a square one.
Are there any other practical grid improvement suggestions out there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2018, 10:20 AM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
9,829 posts, read 7,262,857 times
Reputation: 7790
Atlanta needs more street and road connections. We need a grid!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2018, 11:05 AM
bu2
 
24,104 posts, read 14,885,315 times
Reputation: 12935
Quote:
Originally Posted by atler8 View Post
As I wrote yesterday, 14th St. is a TERRIBLE spot for gridlock that got worse by a factor of multiple times as I accumulated 32 years of working adjacent to it.
Related not only specifically to the mess of 14th but which really hurts Midtown overall is the disconnected & interrupted pattern of streets found in the partial grid in that area.
An obstacle none of us would ever trade away but which is symptomatic of the "interruption" I speak of is Piedmont Park. There's nothing we'd ever want to or be able to do to change it but just as a point of analysis, think about how it's location forces anyone driving trying to gain an east to west entry into Midtown, say to the major business area near 14th & Peachtree, to either come in via 10th St. or from well to the north from the intersection of Monroe Drive @ Piedmont & then to come south via Piedmont Avenue & on into 14th St.
Similarly, there are many other smaller gaps in the street grid pattern that will come to mind if one considers how often a turn must be made at an intersection because the street does not go through into the next intersection one block over. That of course, is largely due to the fact that development often occurred in a hap hazard manner exacerbated by gaps in time as adjacent blocks were laid out & then built up.
A couple of suggestions for "What to do?" here might give hope.
There is a proposal to extend 15th st. west on beyond it's ending intersection with W. Peachtree St., an extension of which is planned to given an additional HOV access point at the Connector but which would eliminate the current problem in that all west bound traffic on 15th St. is forced to turn right & go northbound on W. Peachtree. That intersection as it now stands is truly is one of the major problematic "gaps" in the grid!
And, something done about 8 years ago on Peachtree @ 11th St. NE. was the reduction in the traffic-clogging signal light delays there as the former dog-leg nature of that intersection was eliminated via the purchase of property & the subsequent straightening out of Peachtree @ 11th St. intersection into a square one.
Are there any other practical grid improvement suggestions out there?
I missed a turn to a restaurant off 14th street once about 6 pm. I had to do about a 1 mile round trip detour to get back and it took a full hour. And there were no obvious accidents or malfunctioning signals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2018, 11:07 AM
bu2
 
24,104 posts, read 14,885,315 times
Reputation: 12935
We need:
Signal synchronization
Left turn lanes
Longer left turn lanes
Some restriction on left turns
Ban Atlanta police from directing traffic-they always make things worse!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2018, 12:30 PM
 
Location: Jonesboro
3,874 posts, read 4,697,874 times
Reputation: 5365
Default Intown traffic..

Quote:
Originally Posted by bu2 View Post
I missed a turn to a restaurant off 14th street once about 6 pm. I had to do about a 1 mile round trip detour to get back and it took a full hour. And there were no obvious accidents or malfunctioning signals.

And your cited experience of having to do a 1 mile detour to get back to the point of your missed turn speaks exactly to the situation & the lack of a better-connected street grid.
And that problem makes one really want to visit the area, whether for work, or for fun or in terms of residence, doesn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2018, 03:02 PM
 
9,008 posts, read 14,057,844 times
Reputation: 7643
But giving up a lane of traffic on 10th St. to create a bike lane eased traffic woes, didn't it?

So the solution is simple. We just need to give up a couple lanes on 14th to bikers and make it a 2-lane street. That should solve the problem. Why won't they do this????

(I am not against bike traffic. I'm only against giving up lanes of street traffic to accommodate it. Much better to build a 10-12 foot wide multi-use trail on the border of Piedmont Park like a normal human being would do.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2018, 04:51 PM
 
1,582 posts, read 2,185,517 times
Reputation: 1140
Quote:
Originally Posted by bu2 View Post
We need:
Signal synchronization
Left turn lanes
Longer left turn lanes
Some restriction on left turns
Ban Atlanta police from directing traffic-they always make things worse!

We need:

Less people driving. That's the only thing that actually works.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2018, 07:12 PM
 
1 posts, read 724 times
Reputation: 23
Atlanta a rose? That's perhaps only here on this forum. More like a crap sandwich.

Now, Atlanta traffic is so bad because of poor planning, a terrible state DOT, and racial tension. While the town is getting better you still have a heck of a long way to go. Things like the beltline will help. But the beltline wont help the hundreds of thousands of simi trucks clogging 285, or the single lane road expected to serve 500k homes with a light at every 10 feet. I love the roads that circle back, like a zig zag to nowhere. It's almost like the DOT made nature trails and then paved them and called that the road system. "Two roads diverged in the wood" and they went to the exact same place so everyone from both roads was stuck at the same left turn.

Someone once had a solution for the 285 trucks. Atlanta and GA, like usual, couldn't get something done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top