Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-03-2008, 05:55 AM
 
779 posts, read 2,247,502 times
Reputation: 184

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canes2006Champs View Post
I did, and all I can say is Yuck!
Never would I expect for BMW to manufacture such monstrosity of a car. Never.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-03-2008, 06:50 AM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,965 posts, read 75,205,836 times
Reputation: 66925
Quote:
Originally Posted by bandsofblue View Post
Whats wrong with the Aztek? I LOVE the Aztek
It's ugly, for sure, but it looks extraordinarily practical and versatile. Then again, it's a Pontiac, so it would likely spend more time in the shop than on the road (no offense intended to Pontiac owners or aficionados).

Quote:
Originally Posted by LEVOW View Post
The World's Ugliest Cars

[check out this list, pretty entertaining]
I'll agree about the Cadillacs. Ug-leeee! But then again, Cadillacs have never really been the most attractive of car lines, have they?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Grosse Ile Michigan
30,708 posts, read 79,820,680 times
Reputation: 39453
I saw an E-mail that said that they are having a reunion for the 45 designers involved in the creation of the Aztec. It will be the first time that they ever met.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 08:37 AM
 
2,625 posts, read 11,219,784 times
Reputation: 1890
i wonder how pontiac feels, knowing that they created one of the ugliest cars ever!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 09:04 AM
 
Location: south central Pa
140 posts, read 859,649 times
Reputation: 119
Can't forget this one....But was it really a car with the name being "thing"
Attached Thumbnails
Talking of ugly cars!!-volkswagen_thing.jpg  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 10:56 AM
 
2,625 posts, read 11,219,784 times
Reputation: 1890
We Love Pontiac - 1999 Pontiac Aztek Concept Vehicle

actually the concept looked descent for the aztek.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Lettuce Land
681 posts, read 2,913,366 times
Reputation: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldjensens View Post
I saw an E-mail that said that they are having a reunion for the 45 designers involved in the creation of the Aztec. It will be the first time that they ever met.
I wonder who will interpret for them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Lettuce Land
681 posts, read 2,913,366 times
Reputation: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwimac View Post
Saw one of those recently. Quite a bit of room inside.
The older ones with the flappy doors looked like the body of a huge mosquito waiting to ponce on someone, but the updated 2003 version of the Multipla fixed the doors and gave it an altogether different ugly look. But what's to expect from Europeans? They prefer junk to class.
Attached Thumbnails
Talking of ugly cars!!-2003multipla.jpg  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 06:36 PM
 
2,625 posts, read 11,219,784 times
Reputation: 1890

this is pontiac azteks cousin, also ugly as hell!!!!

how about these, people had mixed reviews on these
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 10:29 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,201,963 times
Reputation: 29983
^^ I didn't care for the regular-body Fieros, but I thought the Fiero GTs (as pictured above) looked great, and they still look pretty good today. It's a shame that the Fiero got axed just as they finally got it right -- MY 1988, the last year for the Fiero, had a suspiciously Lotus-eqsue suspension setup (Chapman struts in the rear), and in 1989 the GT was slated to get the 175HP GMO Quad4 engine. That would have been a little screamer of a car.

For comparison sake, here's a "regular" Fiero body, not nearly as decent as the GT:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/29/FieroFormula.JPG (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top