Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's ugly, for sure, but it looks extraordinarily practical and versatile. Then again, it's a Pontiac, so it would likely spend more time in the shop than on the road (no offense intended to Pontiac owners or aficionados).
I saw an E-mail that said that they are having a reunion for the 45 designers involved in the creation of the Aztec. It will be the first time that they ever met.
I saw an E-mail that said that they are having a reunion for the 45 designers involved in the creation of the Aztec. It will be the first time that they ever met.
Saw one of those recently. Quite a bit of room inside.
The older ones with the flappy doors looked like the body of a huge mosquito waiting to ponce on someone, but the updated 2003 version of the Multipla fixed the doors and gave it an altogether different ugly look. But what's to expect from Europeans? They prefer junk to class.
^^ I didn't care for the regular-body Fieros, but I thought the Fiero GTs (as pictured above) looked great, and they still look pretty good today. It's a shame that the Fiero got axed just as they finally got it right -- MY 1988, the last year for the Fiero, had a suspiciously Lotus-eqsue suspension setup (Chapman struts in the rear), and in 1989 the GT was slated to get the 175HP GMO Quad4 engine. That would have been a little screamer of a car.
For comparison sake, here's a "regular" Fiero body, not nearly as decent as the GT:
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.