Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-20-2016, 07:00 PM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,231,255 times
Reputation: 29354

Advertisements

A fire on board does not preclude terrorism. A fire could have been intentionally started or caused by a small well-placed bomb not strong enough to breach the hull. This fire would seem to have to break out very rapidly to bring the plane down so quickly and without any mayday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-20-2016, 07:04 PM
 
13,754 posts, read 13,332,006 times
Reputation: 26025
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
The first rule is FLY THE AIRPLANE, anything else is secondary.
So right. Natural instinct of a pilot "Don't crash". We had a pilot nearly die trying to save a plane in a barrel roll (no chance). Thankfully his back seater initiated ejection. (F4, Philippines, lots of videos around of the crash)

I get the feeling there was an explosion (or something traumatic) in the avionics bay that affected/damaged the relays or contactors involved in those right windshield systems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2016, 07:04 PM
 
7,489 posts, read 4,959,146 times
Reputation: 8031
This is interesting. Was the problem of smoke in the lavatory fixed when it first occurred, or was it set aside for later?
Attached Thumbnails
Egypt Air flight from Paris to Cairo disappears from radar-aviation-eqypt.jpg  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2016, 07:07 PM
 
9,408 posts, read 11,936,631 times
Reputation: 12440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lieneke View Post
This is interesting. Was the problem of smoke in the lavatory fixed when it first occurred, or was it set aside for later?
We don't know yet, but highly unlikely. It was just one of the cascading events that unfolded within minutes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2016, 07:10 PM
 
7,489 posts, read 4,959,146 times
Reputation: 8031
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11thHour View Post
We don't know yet, but highly unlikely. It was just one of the cascading events that unfolded within minutes.
Is the history in the course of a day, a week? I assumed that it was in the course of a week, but do I understand correctly that smoke in the lavatory could have first happened during an earlier flight that day?

If that's the case, this is all on the airline carrier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2016, 07:16 PM
 
9,408 posts, read 11,936,631 times
Reputation: 12440
Ah, I see that it's showing another occurrence at some point earlier, so who knows. It doesn't tell us exactly when that occurrence was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2016, 07:22 PM
 
7,489 posts, read 4,959,146 times
Reputation: 8031
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11thHour View Post
Ah, I see that it's showing another occurrence at some point earlier, so who knows. It doesn't tell us exactly when that occurrence was.
Sorry - that last image was a bit small. Yes, I'm looking at the first instance and the dates from May 18-19. If the first instance of smoke in the lavatory was on May 18, and it wasn't properly repaired, then this is on the airline.
Attached Thumbnails
Egypt Air flight from Paris to Cairo disappears from radar-aviation-eqypt-crop.jpg  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2016, 07:54 PM
 
Location: Sydney, Australia
11,655 posts, read 12,966,685 times
Reputation: 6391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unsettomati View Post
This makes zero sense. Zero.

First, the aircraft was bound for Egypt - turning around and flying the length of the Mediterranean was probably beyond its fuel load.

Second, you somehow imagine that an airliner is going to fly through the Straits of Gibraltar and not be noticed on radar?

Third, what would be the point? Instead of just a bomb or someone on a suicide mission, it would have to be a takeover that included someone who could fly the aircraft. Sure, 09/11 proved that's possible, but since it's also exponentially more complex that just a mission to destroy an aircraft, there needs to be some payoff. And that payoff would be... um, what, precisely? And the idea that this would somehow be cunning makes even less than zero sense.
Considering what happened to the 9/11 planes and MH370, why would that scenario make "zero sense"?

Anyway, it's just speculation. No need to get overly defensive and complacent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2016, 08:56 PM
 
7,489 posts, read 4,959,146 times
Reputation: 8031
I'm ready to run with mechanical failure that first started under the lavatory near the cockpit earlier in the flight, or earlier in the 24 hour flight history. It looks like there is a point in the Occurrance History indicating that it could have been looked at during a stop-over maintenance check. It looks to me like there was an issue with computer wires that resulted in a full malfunction while transitioning between two airspace traffic controller towers.

It really depends on what the data on the chart means. The dates are May18-19 and there are 15 markers in the row. The lavatory smoke row is checked at marker 7 in the row, and then again on marker 15 in the row. is that hour 7 and hour 15 of scheduled maintenance?

How many hours was the flight? I'm guessing that it is fewer than 8 hours, and that the first alert to smoke in the lavatory was during an earlier flight. Was that problem checked at the last stop over?

What is the scheduled maintenance in terms of hours?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2016, 05:51 AM
 
43,682 posts, read 44,425,236 times
Reputation: 20580
Any possibility that one pilot was trying to commit suicide and the other was trying to prevent the plane going down and this caused some the strange movements of the plane before going down into the sea?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top