Quote:
Originally Posted by HarleyAmbrose
Your in a Christian forum and you want to call everything a myth - you won't convince anyone.Wasting your time.
|
Well, ya;
Gen. ch 1-11 is pre-historical myth. There's a good example.
"Myth" does not mean it should be disregarded as a useless story. That stuff is in scripture, and don't we believe the scriptures were inspired by the Holy Spirit? Myth is a literary genre. Just like the gospel. The writers were creating a new genre. There are Epistles. Apocalyptic literature: Daniel, Revelation.
The bible is not a history book. Properly understood, it is a collection of many different genres, with many and varied (and often contradictory) theological viewpoints. To take it too literally is to cut it off at the knees. To take it too literally is to refuse to plumb it, to investigate how profound it is--- way beyond what a merely literal reading can offer.
But people have to be willing to
learn. And people often don't learn, are not
open to learning anything new, unless they have something at stake, and are being
required to learn. Call it "Original Sin." Call it "the human condition."
A pastor colleague told me about a guy in his church. He was just put on the church's Board. He was good enough to stop in, offering to do what needed to be done.
My friend told him in broad terms about what was expected. The church member said: "Well, you know, anything you need done......
So the pastor went through it all, again.
And the member's response was the same.
The pastor tried a third time. But there was not anything different in that fellow's reply.
What that pastor WANTED to say, but did NOT, was: "LEARN, Tom! GROW, Tom!"
......Ya.