Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-11-2010, 03:07 PM
 
252 posts, read 493,124 times
Reputation: 192

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnutella View Post
8 + 0 = 8
Sorry Gnutella, but I didn't see the rankings were by MSA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-11-2010, 04:32 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,738,907 times
Reputation: 17398
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
And one more area approved and being Developed Cira Center South to link the Penn Campust to Center city along the Schuckyll - tallest at about 600ft

PennConnects : *—*Cira Centre South Images
Well this is for existing skyscrapers. I left proposals out because until they're built, they don't exist. Besides, it'd be very hard to track all the proposals across 50 different MSAs, and figure out which ones are still on the table.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2010, 01:11 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
7,582 posts, read 10,769,325 times
Reputation: 6572
First off... Excellent job putting this list together! Great food for thought

I just felt a need to say something or add an '*' to the list.

If you were to list buildings at different levels 250 ft, 400ft, 600ft, 700ft, 800ft... etc... the rankings would change each time as the character of building height differs from city to city.

Take Miami and Atlanta. Atlanta has more reeally tall buildings than Miami, but Miami being on the cost and having awesome views has tons of residential hgihrises and condo towers, which are generally shorter than major office buildings, but there are tons of them. Atlanta could never keep up in that respect, whereas Miami will never quite have the class A office market, which tends to build really tall buildings, that Atlanta has.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2010, 06:43 AM
 
4,692 posts, read 9,304,031 times
Reputation: 1330
Another interesting measure would be to take the 10 tallest buildings in each city and add them up to see how tall each respective skyline is. That would give a semi good balance of density and height. I think my hometown of Charlotte punches above its weight in the skyline department.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2010, 08:29 AM
 
7,330 posts, read 15,383,950 times
Reputation: 3800
Quote:
Originally Posted by adavi215 View Post
Another interesting measure would be to take the 10 tallest buildings in each city and add them up to see how tall each respective skyline is. That would give a semi good balance of density and height. I think my hometown of Charlotte punches above its weight in the skyline department.
Maybe interesting. Charlotte's got a nice little skyline, but this is a measure deliberately designed to take advantage of the fact that CLT's pretty much only got 10 buildings of any size... Well, 6 over 500, plus another 7 between 400-500.

But hey. I'll bite.

Charlotte's top 10: 5927 combined feet.


Atlanta's top ten: 7594
Pittsburgh's top 10: 6065
Philly's top 10: 7120
Chicago's top ten: 9685
Chicago's top FIVE: 6110

Now, if we go back to MSAs of similar populations, the numbers are better.

Indy: 4461
Columbus: 4980

And there are many MSAs of similar size with total crap skylines.

Still, I don't know that the underlying message is different by totaling height than by simply relating the number of buildings over a certain height.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2010, 08:49 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,943,565 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwkimbro View Post
First off... Excellent job putting this list together! Great food for thought

I just felt a need to say something or add an '*' to the list.

If you were to list buildings at different levels 250 ft, 400ft, 600ft, 700ft, 800ft... etc... the rankings would change each time as the character of building height differs from city to city.

Take Miami and Atlanta. Atlanta has more reeally tall buildings than Miami, but Miami being on the cost and having awesome views has tons of residential hgihrises and condo towers, which are generally shorter than major office buildings, but there are tons of them. Atlanta could never keep up in that respect, whereas Miami will never quite have the class A office market, which tends to build really tall buildings, that Atlanta has.
Yeah the same for Philadelphia, Los Angeles, etc. every height changes the make up. That is why a firm standard should be used

Emporis lists the number of Hi rise buildings per city as follows

1. New York 5928
2. Chicago 1118
3. Los Angeles 509
4. San Francisco 418
5. Houston 359
6. Philadelphia 329
7. Miami 295
8. Dallas 245
9. Boston 235
10. Atlanta 233
11. Seattle 225
12. Minneapolis 192
13. Detroit 173

I am not sure if I missed some.


New York is just crazy
Pittsburgh 131
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2010, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,943,565 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarolinaBredChicagoan View Post
Maybe interesting. Charlotte's got a nice little skyline, but this is a measure deliberately designed to take advantage of the fact that CLT's pretty much only got 10 buildings of any size... Well, 6 over 500, plus another 7 between 400-500.

But hey. I'll bite.

Charlotte's top 10: 5927 combined feet.


Atlanta's top ten: 7594
Pittsburgh's top 10: 6065
Philly's top 10: 7120
Chicago's top ten: 9685
Chicago's top FIVE: 6110
Houston's top 5: 4437
Houston's top 10: 8105

Its still pretty close to Chicago in this metric, but in shear numbers on hi rises, Chicago is still waaay ahead
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2010, 08:57 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,910,924 times
Reputation: 7976
What is considered a hi rise by emporis?

This makes sense on Philly as although there are not many really tall buildings there are a lot of smaller to mid height hi rises and almost all all clustered thus giving a great deal of density, especially at the street level
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2010, 08:59 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,910,924 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarolinaBredChicagoan View Post
Maybe interesting. Charlotte's got a nice little skyline, but this is a measure deliberately designed to take advantage of the fact that CLT's pretty much only got 10 buildings of any size... Well, 6 over 500, plus another 7 between 400-500.

But hey. I'll bite.

Charlotte's top 10: 5927 combined feet.


Atlanta's top ten: 7594
Pittsburgh's top 10: 6065
Philly's top 10: 7120
Chicago's top ten: 9685
Chicago's top FIVE: 6110

Now, if we go back to MSAs of similar populations, the numbers are better.

Indy: 4461
Columbus: 4980

And there are many MSAs of similar size with total crap skylines.

Still, I don't know that the underlying message is different by totaling height than by simply relating the number of buildings over a certain height.

What is interesting is that Philly would actually overtake the top height to Atlanta with the ACC

Also am curious how Miami, Houston, SF, LA, and Dallas would do on this metric, or even Boston for that matter
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2010, 09:01 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,943,565 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
What is interesting is that Philly would actually overtake the top height to Atlanta with the ACC

Also am curious how Miami, Houston, SF, LA, and Dallas would do on this metric, or even Boston for that matter
posted Houstons,
Dallas came up to about 7000 (about 3000 less than ATL)
LA is 6973
Miami comes up to 6666
San Fran is 6525

Last edited by HtownLove; 11-12-2010 at 09:09 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top