Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-02-2011, 04:31 PM
 
Location: Detroit, MI
22 posts, read 38,609 times
Reputation: 19

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by theone, View Post
Flint, NY is a dump.
Flint used to be a great city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-02-2011, 04:55 PM
 
Location: Buffalo, New York
205 posts, read 479,265 times
Reputation: 163
Quote:
Originally Posted by theone, View Post
Upstate drags Downstate down tremendously fiscally and population growth wise.
Bahaha. So naive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2011, 04:55 PM
 
Location: South St Louis
4,363 posts, read 4,560,191 times
Reputation: 3166
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnDBaumgardner View Post
CLEVELAND has shed a sizable level of population in the last decade, something that is common amongst many midwestern cities that include Chicago, Detroit and St. Louis.
Now, the city and metro populations have shown signs of stabilization ... indeed, a large portion of CLEVELAND'S population exodus was dispersed in it's vast and far flung surrounding suburbs, something that many people tend to overlook.
This city isn't "running out of people", but certainly it is a city with a significantly smaller population ... not entirely a bad thing, depending on how one "chooses to look at it".
Correction: St Louis lost population from 1950 to 2000, after which it stabilized. During the last decade, the population actually increased.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2011, 08:17 PM
 
6,613 posts, read 16,576,265 times
Reputation: 4787
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnDBaumgardner View Post
It's been a very long time coming, but CLEVELAND has already begun a major shift / transition away from heavy manufacturing and is now
a WORLD WIDE DESTINATION for our advanced and RENOWNED healthcare ... offering both the prestigious Cleveland Clinic Foundation and University Hospitals of Cleveland / Case Medical Centre.

Now, the brand new Cleveland Medical Mart & Convention Centre is breaking ground this month, further strengthening and advancing
Cleveland's position as a burgeoning mecca for healthcare and related arts.

More tourism dollars are coming, too ... with a brand new CASINO that will be constructed downtown, in addition to a brand new AQUARIUM in the revered 'flats district' of downtown.

There are BILLIONS being spent that are all part of a much larger picture of Cleveland's BRIGHT future ...

People are 'rediscovering Cleveland'
John, you are absolutely correct. But does/will healthcare and tourism match the huge economic output that manufacturing was for Cleveland during its heyday?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2011, 09:32 PM
 
7,237 posts, read 12,738,680 times
Reputation: 5669
Quote:
Originally Posted by bryson662001 View Post
Good question. I don't know how/why they missed it. Is it still shrinking?
If the latest 2010 census estimates I'm hearing are true, it would lose its stance as the 2nd largest midwest city to Indianapolis with a population drop to 700,000 - 750,000.

That said, the metro area is still beating Indianapolis 2 to 1, but statistically (and when it comes to federal dollars) it doesn't matter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2011, 12:36 AM
 
276 posts, read 476,747 times
Reputation: 232
If there is a city without any people, please let me know so I can move there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2011, 08:46 AM
 
191 posts, read 809,534 times
Reputation: 187
I don't know about the major cities but I have been to small towns that have lost at least 90% of their population like Brownsville, PA, Lynch, KY, Pocahontas, VA, and Welch, WV. People on CDF forget that their are places outside of the top 100 cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2011, 09:57 AM
 
Location: a swanky suburb in my fancy pants
3,391 posts, read 8,777,584 times
Reputation: 1624
Quote:
Originally Posted by 313Weather View Post
If the latest 2010 census estimates I'm hearing are true, it would lose its stance as the 2nd largest midwest city to Indianapolis with a population drop to 700,000 - 750,000.
.
HOLY S#%T
That's a friken evacuation!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2011, 10:18 AM
 
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
1,374 posts, read 3,253,668 times
Reputation: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1greatcity View Post
Correction: St Louis lost population from 1950 to 2000, after which it stabilized. During the last decade, the population actually increased.

What do you mean by saying "correction"? My statement concerning Cleveland is absolutely accurate ... and not having any relation to St. Louis, so what is this about a "correction"??


Cleveland has shed a sizable amount of it's city population, but it's vast suburban areas are still burgeoning and growing at a good rate.
Indeed, the population of metro Cleveland has shown signs of stabilization.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2011, 10:29 AM
 
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
1,374 posts, read 3,253,668 times
Reputation: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Around View Post
John, you are absolutely correct. But does/will healthcare and tourism match the huge economic output that manufacturing was for Cleveland during its heyday?

Well, it's certainly going to become a much more different city from the 'bottom on up', as Cleveland continues it's latest transformation and renaissance.

Heavy manufacturing, factories and the auto industry helped to create and shape Cleveland into an industrial 'GOLIATH" during it's early developmental and 'booming' years ... Now, healthcare, tourism and biosciences are beginning to fill in the massive cracks that were left in this important cities bedrock ... the very foundation on which Cleveland exists!

I see a much brighter future ahead in Cleveland ... there are not too many cities left out there with the vast amenities, infrastructure, cultural endowments and an enviable cost of living that are comparable to that of Cleveland.

Cleveland isn't going to 'turn the corner' ... IT ALREADY HAS!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top