Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city will have the most dramatic change by 2020
Atlanta 20 10.93%
Boston 2 1.09%
Los Angeles 31 16.94%
Philadelphia 17 9.29%
Washington DC 12 6.56%
Seattle 15 8.20%
San Francisco 7 3.83%
New York 11 6.01%
Chicago 9 4.92%
Miami 10 5.46%
Dallas 10 5.46%
Houston 14 7.65%
Phoenix 13 7.10%
Minneapolis 7 3.83%
Charlotte 5 2.73%
Voters: 183. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-06-2014, 09:56 PM
 
Location: Downtown LA
1,192 posts, read 1,643,055 times
Reputation: 868

Advertisements

[quote=Octa;35537041]
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.Talbott View Post
No. Just. No.

Austin is doing a lot for a downtown of it's size, but some of these other cities are doing so much more. Really take the time to do a little research on what these other places are developing. People put too much weight into high-rise development.[/QUOTE]


I agree. What makes DC an interesting city is how it has a height restriction yet it virtually beats every city in the country outside of a handful when it comes to ground level activity.
One could make the argument that DC's height limit is one of the prime factors directly contributing to its ground level activity. In many US downtowns you'll see highrises right next to vacant lots or parking lots. That kind of development pattern discourages foot traffic and prevents neighborhoods from ever reaching a critical mass of pedestrians, restaurants, and shops where a neighborhood feels alive. DC's height limit has prevented developers from building higher than 12 or 13 stories on any given lot, incentivising them build more projects on multiple lots, filling in the gaps in DC's urban fabric much faster than it would have happened otherwise. There's unbroken walls of buildings filled with retail on most of the commercial corridors. Its fantastic urban design.

Now that we're at the point where there's very little developable land in DC left however, I am hoping they rethink the hight limit. They don't need to lift it completely, but it would be great if they could lift it in strategic locations. 30 story towers would work just fine in a neighborhood like NoMa in my opinion.

EDIT: Almost forgot to mention- DC's height limit has also encouraged subterranean parking because developers want to maximize above ground leasable space. In many other cities developers opt for less expensive podium parking instead, which can absolutely kill a block if not done correctly. If a podium is wrapped in retail, disguised so its less ugly, and if curb cuts for car entrances and exits are kept to a minimum then they can still work, but keeping all parking completely underground is usually better in every way.

I see some negatives in DC's height limit though: For one, developers tend to build lower ceilings in an effort to maximize the number of floors in the allowable envelope. When I moved from DC to LA the higher ceilings in all the office buildings was immediately apparent (and a welcome relief). Developers also tend to build boxy buildings for the same reason - adding spires or other non-habitable ornamentation means they're not maximizing floor space. Exhibit A: K Street from Washington Circle to Mt Vernon Square. Never will you see a more boring corridor of boxy 12 story buildings.

TL;DR - DC's height limit has made for some fantastic urban design and some terribly bland architecture.

Last edited by DistrictDirt; 07-06-2014 at 10:09 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-06-2014, 10:08 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,853,364 times
Reputation: 4049
[quote=DistrictDirt;35540120]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octa View Post

One could make the argument that DC's height limit is one of the prime factors directly contributing to its ground level activity. In many US downtowns you'll see highrises right next to vacant lots or parking lots. That kind of development pattern discourages foot traffic and prevents neighborhoods from ever reaching a critical mass of pedestrians, restaurants, and shops where a neighborhood feels alive. DC's height limit has prevented developers from building higher than 12 or 13 stories on any given lot, incentivising them build more projects on multiple lots, filling in the gaps in DC's urban fabric much faster than it would have happened otherwise. There's unbroken walls of buildings filled with retail on most of the commercial corridors. Its fantastic urban design.

Now that we're at the point where there's very little developable land in DC left however, I am hoping they rethink the hight limit. They don't need to lift it completely, but it would be great if they could lift it in strategic locations. 30 story towers would work just fine in a neighborhood like NoMa in my opinion.
I agree, I've only been to DC once but I really enjoyed its mid-rise downtown. It does feel a bit like someone sliced Midtown Manhattan part way up the buildings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2014, 02:06 AM
 
1,635 posts, read 2,712,349 times
Reputation: 574
[quote=munchitup;35539896]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octa View Post

Not sure why tall buildings make a difference for ground level activity though.
Tall buildings = more people = more retail being developed = more parks being developed = more transit being developed = hospital expansion = more pedestrian activity etc....

Tall buildings do make a difference. See New York, Toronto, Chicago etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2014, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Atlanta ,GA
9,067 posts, read 15,794,327 times
Reputation: 2980
[quote=mrjun18;35541378]
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post

Tall buildings = more people = more retail being developed = more parks being developed = more transit being developed = hospital expansion = more pedestrian activity etc....

Tall buildings do make a difference. See New York, Toronto, Chicago etc.
Not necessarily disagreeing but look at many European cities.
They dont have tall building like in the U.S. and Canada and in most cases those cities are bustling with activity and even moreso than those cities with many taller buildings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2014, 10:06 AM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,335,229 times
Reputation: 10644
Tall buildings are pretty much irrelevent to the question.

And tall buildings generally harm pedestrian development. If you look at the most desirable and busiest urban neighborhoods across the planet, they generally lack highrises.

Even in Manhattan, most of the best neighborhoods are not that packed with highrises.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2014, 10:12 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,910,924 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Tall buildings are pretty much irrelevent to the question.

And tall buildings generally harm pedestrian development. If you look at the most desirable and busiest urban neighborhoods across the planet, they generally lack highrises.

Even in Manhattan, most of the best neighborhoods are not that packed with highrises.
It probably has less to do with height and more to do with mixed use and interaction

Can be tall or not tall and still be conducive to vibrancy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2014, 11:56 AM
 
1,635 posts, read 2,712,349 times
Reputation: 574
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
It probably has less to do with height and more to do with mixed use and interaction

Can be tall or not tall and still be conducive to vibrancy
Agreed. Though taller buildings and buildings with more floor space that bring more people into downtown, will further bring new retail, office, parkland, transit etc development at a greater rate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2014, 12:01 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,335,229 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrjun18 View Post
Agreed. Though taller buildings and buildings with more floor space that bring more people into downtown, will further bring new retail, office, parkland, transit etc development at a greater rate.
Again, tall buildings have nothing to do with any of this.

It seems that people are conflating tall buildings with big buildings or something. Obviously a neighborhood of 10-floor buildings can be denser than a neighborhood of 50-floor buildings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2014, 12:03 PM
 
1,635 posts, read 2,712,349 times
Reputation: 574
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Tall buildings are pretty much irrelevent to the question.

And tall buildings generally harm pedestrian development. If you look at the most desirable and busiest urban neighborhoods across the planet, they generally lack highrises.

Even in Manhattan, most of the best neighborhoods are not that packed with highrises.
Thats because European cities that are like that have high density residential developments all over the place..... Very few cities in US/Canada have those types of downtown population densities or anything close. Mainly New York City, Chicago and Toronto and SF are probably the only ones that come close..... In addition to highrises, lots and lots of mid to low rise developments have to be around which is what NYC, Toronto etc have existing and under construction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2014, 12:07 PM
 
1,635 posts, read 2,712,349 times
Reputation: 574
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Again, tall buildings have nothing to do with any of this.

It seems that people are conflating tall buildings with big buildings or something. Obviously a neighborhood of 10-floor buildings can be denser than a neighborhood of 50-floor buildings.
Thats why I said "and buildings with lots of floor space". Not sure if you read my post or not.
Not only tall buildings do the job but a ton of smaller buildings can do the job just as well or better. Only a few North American cities have this at the moment in their downtowns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top