Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No counter argument needed. Anyone not living under a rock knows that nothing you wrote is true. My office is half women. It would come to a grinding halt without us. There are intelligent educated women in positions of power all over the world. What really needs to be said?
Due to affirmative action. The 50% of the workforce made up of women didn't outcompete men for their jobs.
If the workforce were all-male everything would run much more smoothly.
PS all porn isn't kiddie porn. Legalizing adult porn has nothing to do with exploiting kids.
Yes it does because study after study has shown that most underage kids can view hardcore porn on the internet. At the very least internet porn should be outlawed. If you don't think so then a case could be made that you are aiding molestors of children. You don't have to rape a child to molest them. Allowing them easy access to porn can be counted as a form of molestation.
I'm not even talking about kiddie porn, but children watching porn made with adults.
David Cameron made a slight step in the direction of solving this problem by putting a filter on the internet in Britain for porn.
I made 2 points which call into question the moral calibre of the typical critic of the Duggars. Most of these critics are pro-child murder (which is worse than molestation) and pro-porn (which makes them accessories to child molestation, since most children can easily view porn on the internet).
I made 2 points which call into question the moral calibre of the typical critic of the Duggars. Most of these critics are pro-child murder (which is worse than molestation) and pro-porn (which makes them accessories to child molestation, since most children can easily view porn on the internet).
It's not rocket science, folks.
Those aren't points. They are ad hominem attacks.
If you want to discuss abortion or pornography, you should start threads on those topics.
I made 2 points which call into question the moral calibre of the typical critic of the Duggars. Most of these critics are pro-child murder (which is worse than molestation) and pro-porn (which makes them accessories to child molestation, since most children can easily view porn on the internet).
It's not rocket science, folks.
Hahaha, wow, this is some spin if I've ever seen it. Fail.
If you want to discuss abortion or pornography, you should start threads on those topics.
I didn't direct the accusation at one one in particular. It's no different a tack than people who use the Duggars as an example of why Christianity is false.
It's very apparent that most critics of the Duggars are pro-child murder and pro-pornography. This makes them compromised morally to pass judgment on anybody since their morality is so demented.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
