Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, but saying that the shorts are fine as long as someone's butt checks aren't showing isn't much better. Its just sad that the new standard for what is considered acceptable means not showing any T&A.
The notion that people must dress to meet your standards of 'acceptance' in order to ride on an airliner is ridiculous.
Booking a flight is not a social event. There's no more reason for airline passengers to have to meet your (or my, for that matter) 'acceptance' than there is for someone grabbing a cab or riding on a bus or going to the grocery store for milk.
The notion that people must dress to meet your standards of 'acceptance' in order to ride on an airliner is ridiculous.
Booking a flight is not a social event. There's no more reason for airline passengers to have to meet your (or my, for that matter) 'acceptance' than there is for someone grabbing a cab or riding on a bus or going to the grocery store for milk.
Yet look at Wal-Mart shoppers who wear much less...
You do know that most of those wacky Wal-mart dressers are just trying to get a few minutes of fame, right?
Actually... I've seen a lot of that in some of the rougher wal-marts I've been in, so I don't think it's a put on for a lot of them, it's just their version of casual.
lol, she had more clothes than many these days, only a very small amount of leggs showing.
How it makes a difference if it is thick fabric shorts or underpants? The thing is hidden.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.