Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado > Denver
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-27-2016, 11:22 AM
SQL
 
Location: The State of Delusion - Colorado
1,337 posts, read 1,195,877 times
Reputation: 1492

Advertisements

I think it's gotten more congested due to lack of adequate infrastructure. The problem is there aren't enough highways/avenues (don't confuse with expressways). In the older Midwest, where I'm from, the metro areas were designed with the automobile and larger populations in mind, because that's where a lot of manufacturing jobs were during the early and mid-20th century. There are highways and avenues that serve as major arteries throughout the metros, which make for relatively quicker commute times overall. There's not much of that in Denver Metro, especially on the east side of town.

That said, I don't think traffic is quite as horrendous as some of the more populated coastal cities (but then again, should it be?). It is quite a nuisance, however, that it takes such a relatively long time to travel short distances across town due to the counter-intuitive roadway designs. I don't think Denver really prepared itself to be a big city. And then when the dam broke in the past 10 years or so, this is the end result. On the upside, they are investing in expanding and making some of the more congested interchanges more adequate (6th & I-25, Santa Fe & Alameda). And RTD is expanding bus lines and light rail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-27-2016, 11:25 AM
 
Location: The analog world
17,077 posts, read 13,396,963 times
Reputation: 22904
I think it's hilarious that so many wannabe denizens underestimate the importance of living where you work. We try to tell them....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2016, 11:28 AM
SQL
 
Location: The State of Delusion - Colorado
1,337 posts, read 1,195,877 times
Reputation: 1492
Quote:
Originally Posted by randomparent View Post
I think it's hilarious that so many wannabe denizens underestimate the importance of living where you work. We try to tell them....
COL sorta has an impact on that. Where I work (near downtown) is one of the highest cost of living neighborhoods in Denver. As much as I'd love to buy one of the few four-story, $1MM+ town homes down the street so I can simply walk to work, I can't.

Lots of young professionals are forced to move further away from work so they can afford housing. There's also examples like my GF, who don't want to work close to where she teaches so she doesn't run into all her students while she's out on the town or shopping.

Of course, we've been trying to tell you this as well, but it quite often falls on deaf ears (or blind eyes, I suppose).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2016, 03:05 PM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,201 posts, read 19,256,270 times
Reputation: 38267
Quote:
Originally Posted by SQL View Post
COL sorta has an impact on that. Where I work (near downtown) is one of the highest cost of living neighborhoods in Denver. As much as I'd love to buy one of the few four-story, $1MM+ town homes down the street so I can simply walk to work, I can't.

Lots of young professionals are forced to move further away from work so they can afford housing. There's also examples like my GF, who don't want to work close to where she teaches so she doesn't run into all her students while she's out on the town or shopping.

Of course, we've been trying to tell you this as well, but it quite often falls on deaf ears (or blind eyes, I suppose).
Hyperbole much?

No one goes around telling people they need to buy a million dollar townhouse downtown so they can walk to work. What people do say is something like if you work in the Tech Center, you probably don't want to live in say, Thornton, or any other set of locations that makes no sense for a daily commute.

And your GF's story, while valid, has nothing to do with the cost of living. Even if she could afford to spend anything she wanted on housing, it's reasonable she would want to live in a different neighborhood than her students and their families.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2016, 04:05 PM
 
Location: Highlands Ranch, CO
556 posts, read 764,296 times
Reputation: 848
Quote:
Originally Posted by emm74 View Post
Hyperbole much?
I disagree. That story is literally Hitler.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2016, 06:05 AM
 
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
3,411 posts, read 4,649,045 times
Reputation: 3940
Quote:
Originally Posted by SQL View Post
I think it's gotten more congested due to lack of adequate infrastructure. The problem is there aren't enough highways/avenues (don't confuse with expressways). In the older Midwest, where I'm from, the metro areas were designed with the automobile and larger populations in mind, because that's where a lot of manufacturing jobs were during the early and mid-20th century. There are highways and avenues that serve as major arteries throughout the metros, which make for relatively quicker commute times overall. There's not much of that in Denver Metro, especially on the east side of town.

That said, I don't think traffic is quite as horrendous as some of the more populated coastal cities (but then again, should it be?). It is quite a nuisance, however, that it takes such a relatively long time to travel short distances across town due to the counter-intuitive roadway designs. I don't think Denver really prepared itself to be a big city. And then when the dam broke in the past 10 years or so, this is the end result. On the upside, they are investing in expanding and making some of the more congested interchanges more adequate (6th & I-25, Santa Fe & Alameda). And RTD is expanding bus lines and light rail.
Since I moved to Arizona last June, I've noticed there's more people in the Phoenix metro than Denver. However, their infrastructure and interstates seems to keep up with the population growth much better than Denver. If you want 'real' freeways, drive on Superstition freeway through Mesa and Gilbert. That's how wide C-470 should be in order to accommodate the traffic around the south Denver suburbs.

They're also spending money on their light rail system so the metropolitan area doesn't become like LA either.



vs

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2016, 06:24 AM
 
Location: Highlands Ranch, CO
556 posts, read 764,296 times
Reputation: 848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hschlick84 View Post
Since I moved to Arizona last June, I've noticed there's more people in the Phoenix metro than Denver. However, their infrastructure and interstates seems to keep up with the population growth much better than Denver. If you want 'real' freeways, drive on Superstition freeway through Mesa and Gilbert. That's how wide C-470 should be in order to accommodate the traffic around the south Denver suburbs.

They're also spending money on their light rail system so the metropolitan area doesn't become like LA either.



vs
I agree, that fact that c470 isn't at least 3 lanes on each side is ridiculous, especially since the land is available to do so. It honestly should be four a side. And the lanes they are putting in being a toll road seems a slap in the face.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2016, 06:57 AM
 
Location: Just south of Denver since 1989
11,834 posts, read 34,475,562 times
Reputation: 8991
C470 open on a wintery weekend in April of 1989. My first weekend here as a new resident. The ol' Rocky Mountain News called it the "ghost highway" on Sunday, but on Monday a retraction was warranted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2016, 07:25 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
658 posts, read 1,895,911 times
Reputation: 195
I don't know if all the bridges c470 goes under can/could handle an expansion of two more lanes. At the same time, if people are driving slow in the left lane an additional lane might not make much of a difference. Whose idea was it not to make the beltway a complete circle? It looks like a mangled pac-man. My vote goes for a better metro. The metro here is ridiculously bad. When I have to drive downtown the thought of taking the metro doesn't even enter my brain, which is not how it should be. When living in DC if I had to go downtown the thought of driving never entered my brain.

Denver is waiting too long. I witnessed Charlotte go through this when the population there exploded, but Charlotte pulled the "imminent domain" card out when building their beltway. Of course that didn't sit well with everyone, but their beltway is nice and many lanes. And, it is a circle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2016, 07:45 AM
 
Location: 0.83 Atmospheres
11,474 posts, read 11,585,984 times
Reputation: 11992
Quote:
Originally Posted by mettler View Post
I don't know if all the bridges c470 goes under can/could handle an expansion of two more lanes. At the same time, if people are driving slow in the left lane an additional lane might not make much of a difference. Whose idea was it not to make the beltway a complete circle? It looks like a mangled pac-man. My vote goes for a better metro. The metro here is ridiculously bad. When I have to drive downtown the thought of taking the metro doesn't even enter my brain, which is not how it should be. When living in DC if I had to go downtown the thought of driving never entered my brain.

Denver is waiting too long. I witnessed Charlotte go through this when the population there exploded, but Charlotte pulled the "imminent domain" card out when building their beltway. Of course that didn't sit well with everyone, but their beltway is nice and many lanes. And, it is a circle.
Golden
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado > Denver

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top