Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-12-2012, 11:21 AM
 
17,183 posts, read 22,926,164 times
Reputation: 17478

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mimimomx3 View Post
I hope you read my post above. A government mandate makes it a legal fact that these courses are part of the curriculum. In my opinion, this is wrong. This is a family obligation. Those two concepts are not mutually exclusive. The government cannot convince me that something is RIGHT just because it is LEGAL.
Education is not just readin', writin', 'rithmetic.

That is a very old-fashioned view of what it means to be educated. That was what was taught back in colonial times, but eventually, other subjects were added because to be educated included the arts, music, physical education, etc.

http://ezinearticles.com/?Art-And-Mu...cts?&id=582001

Quote:
Music is associated with mathematics, patterns, and memory function. Art stimulates a part of the brain that has been linked to writing proficiency. Music and art programs do add to our children's academic progress and should be a regular part of their school curriculum.
Why Arts Education Is Crucial, and Who's Doing It Best | Edutopia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-12-2012, 12:28 PM
 
8,231 posts, read 17,322,756 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by nana053 View Post
Education is not just readin', writin', 'rithmetic.

That is a very old-fashioned view of what it means to be educated. That was what was taught back in colonial times, but eventually, other subjects were added because to be educated included the arts, music, physical education, etc.

http://ezinearticles.com/?Art-And-Mu...cts?&id=582001



Why Arts Education Is Crucial, and Who's Doing It Best | Edutopia
Well, I didn't say that arts, music, PE, foreign languages, technical classes, etc aren't important or complementary to education. Far from it. I just think that parents should pay for it, not the taxpayer. Love Edutopia, by the way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2012, 12:30 PM
 
4,386 posts, read 4,239,114 times
Reputation: 5875
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimimomx3 View Post
Well, I didn't say that arts, music, PE, foreign languages, technical classes, etc aren't important or complementary to education. Far from it. I just think that parents should pay for it, not the taxpayer. Love Edutopia, by the way.

And for children who have no parents, let's bring back the workhouses. These children need to start earning their keep. How dare they think that they deserve the same kind of education as children who had the sense to be born to well-off families!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2012, 01:20 PM
 
8,231 posts, read 17,322,756 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by lhpartridge View Post
And for children who have no parents, let's bring back the workhouses. These children need to start earning their keep. How dare they think that they deserve the same kind of education as children who had the sense to be born to well-off families!
ALL our children are going to be in workhouses if the tax burden is not lightened from the middle class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2012, 01:41 PM
 
4,386 posts, read 4,239,114 times
Reputation: 5875
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimimomx3 View Post
ALL our children are going to be in workhouses if the tax burden is not lightened from the middle class.

Yes, it's all right for other people's children, as long as it's not your own. That's what makes a country strong--having an uneducated, illiterate, underemployed proletariat while ensuring that middle class children are guaranteed a much better standard of living all around so that they can maximize their potential and be upwardly mobile.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2012, 02:23 PM
 
8,231 posts, read 17,322,756 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by lhpartridge View Post
Yes, it's all right for other people's children, as long as it's not your own. That's what makes a country strong--having an uneducated, illiterate, underemployed proletariat while ensuring that middle class children are guaranteed a much better standard of living all around so that they can maximize their potential and be upwardly mobile.
Wow. The US has been the most prosperous country in the world exactly because we have had a strong middle class, and there exists the possibility of upward mobility, especially from the poorer lower classes to the more wealthy middle class. By destroying the middle class through over taxation, we are becoming a country of very poor, and very rich- and the very rich are able to shelter their money (which comes from investment income rather than wages, usually). So.....who's going to pay for public education then?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2012, 02:49 PM
 
503 posts, read 807,610 times
Reputation: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimimomx3 View Post
They may be defined by government, and I accept that, as I pay my boatload of taxes promptly and completely. HOWEVER....I disagree that they are part of the basic curriculum. I believe that I am still entitled to disagree with what our government decides?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimimomx3 View Post
I hope you read my post above. A government mandate makes it a legal fact that these courses are part of the curriculum. In my opinion, this is wrong. This is a family obligation. Those two concepts are not mutually exclusive. The government cannot convince me that something is RIGHT just because it is LEGAL.
Well my opinion is that you haven't a clue about what constitutes a total education, which is great than just math, science and English.

It takes much more than that to build a total human being.

Further, your opinion is flat wrong as is evidenced that fine arts courses are indeed part of the curriculum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2012, 02:51 PM
 
8,231 posts, read 17,322,756 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Bowman View Post
Well my opinion is that you haven't a clue about what constitutes a total education, which is great than just math, science and English.

It takes much more than that to build a total human being.

Further, your opinion is flat wrong as is evidenced that fine arts courses are indeed part of the curriculum.
My opinion is not "wrong". It's just not in agreement with the opinion of the federal government, or you. That's ok. I think you're wrong, too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2012, 05:16 PM
 
503 posts, read 807,610 times
Reputation: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimimomx3 View Post
My opinion is not "wrong". It's just not in agreement with the opinion of the federal government, or you. That's ok. I think you're wrong, too.
But the facts are on my side. I forgot though....facts and logic don't matter, only your opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 07:00 AM
 
Location: On the Ohio River in Western, KY
3,387 posts, read 6,629,731 times
Reputation: 3362
Quote:
Originally Posted by anadyr21 View Post
Well, I hope those textbooks don't cost even a fraction as much as college textbooks do, because there would be a hell of a lot of kids without books. So, no, unless the book is damaged.
On average the cost is between 50-75% of the cost of the average new to used college textbook.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
Free education is free education. When any part of it has to be paid for, then it is not free anymore, and there is then no difference between the USA and Congo.
Tell the State of Indiana that then. They require a textbook fee (the one and only year we were there with a kiddo in school, it cost us $120 for the fee for a 1st grader! )

Apparently, there are 3 states that charge textbook fees for public school students, and they range from $100-400! Hell, my books from last fall's semester didn't even cost $400, and I got to keep the books; this fee is just a rental!

I disagree with a textbook rental fee for public school.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top