Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-16-2014, 06:41 PM
 
3,349 posts, read 2,847,536 times
Reputation: 2258

Advertisements

What you think about the school dress code for students being called sexist?
I personal do not see it as sexist.

Last edited by Sommie789; 09-16-2014 at 07:11 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-16-2014, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Middle America
37,409 posts, read 53,569,981 times
Reputation: 53073
What dress code are you talking about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 08:04 PM
 
919 posts, read 1,690,649 times
Reputation: 665
I don't know if this is the article you were referring to but I saw this on BuzzFeed

http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthi...uccess#2vvt7oz

I think it's silly for this to be considered sexism. I'm sorry that your school shares the same dress code that most of the country does. With the exception of the sweat pants and hoodies there is nothing wrong with this. You have self proclaimed "feminists" crying that this is sexism and it's geared only towards females but you would not expect boys to wear shirts that expose cleavage or midriffs. You also would not expect a male to wear booty shorts... I know a boy who thought it would be cute to do a so called "social experiment" and wore leggings to school, you could imagine the sight, needless to say the boy was sent to change immediately. BOy have dress codes as well, no boxers hanging out, in my high school it was also no big baggy shirts and a shirt must be worn at all times.

The comments in the article i posted mention how it's ok for boys to walk around without shirts during gym... in my college the basketball players keep their shirts on all the time, they really only take them off when they're on their way to the locker room.
So i am not sure what type of high school these people went to but shirts stay on over here.

Also as far as the argument that "breasts are not sexual therefore, they should not distract learning" is ridiculous IMO as well. Sure, for a breastfeeding mom they aren't but I have to wonder if the people making these comments remember what they may have worn in high school and college (either to bring attention to, or take attention away from). then tell me they aren't sexual...

Sorry, rant over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 08:13 PM
 
3,138 posts, read 2,779,947 times
Reputation: 5099
I think any individual wearing a pair of shorts or skirt so short that you can see their Cee U Next Tuesday, or any tight or provocative top ,shouldn't be allowed to do so. It isn't sexism: it's being appropriate and respectful not only to yourself, but to those around you. The same is true for boys who walk around in the wife-beaters or have their boxers hanging out or their pants hanging down.

When I was in school in the 80s and 90s, we had school uniforms in public school. And even amidst those uniforms, there were variations, but very few...We were required to go through measurements for those uniforms. We wore them, and if we were lucky, maybe one or two fridays out of the season, we were allowed to wear our own clothes.

In a society where the thought process has become this frightening dogma, "let me be me, let me do me, let me have my freedom...me...me...me", it's no wonder that the issues above are ubiquitous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 09:50 PM
 
847 posts, read 766,825 times
Reputation: 426
dress code pertain to norms in the society.

50 years ago having any Tatoos would have been frowned upon.

Now 30% of American have Tats to "express themselves".

Schools can't force strict dress codes if none of the manufacturers produce such clothing.

I don't think it is for schools tell students what kind of cloth to wear. But rather they should be told what areas should be covered.

now if a girl likes to wear pants, skirt or pjs to school I don't think it should matter.

One thing I find about school gym is how the promote over objectification of women.
Girls must wear revealing dress when playing tennis.
Girls must wear revealing clothing during cheer leading.
compare gymnastics vs boys.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 10:00 PM
 
4,875 posts, read 10,071,404 times
Reputation: 1993
In Japan girls have to wear "bloomers" that show off the legs, but in the US girls have the same kinds of gym shorts boys wear.

Some schools do have risque cheerleading outfits for girls, but others have more modest outfits. Maybe allowing a choice of outfits and/or allowing girls to wear the boys' outfits (and vice versa) may be a good idea. In particular, conservative Muslim students who want to cheerlead would be allowed to wear a boys' cheerleading outfit with a hijab securely fastened.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericsami View Post
dress code pertain to norms in the society.

50 years ago having any Tatoos would have been frowned upon.

Now 30% of American have Tats to "express themselves".

Schools can't force strict dress codes if none of the manufacturers produce such clothing.

I don't think it is for schools tell students what kind of cloth to wear. But rather they should be told what areas should be covered.

now if a girl likes to wear pants, skirt or pjs to school I don't think it should matter.

One thing I find about school gym is how the promote over objectification of women.
Girls must wear revealing dress when playing tennis.
Girls must wear revealing clothing during cheer leading.
compare gymnastics vs boys.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2014, 06:06 AM
 
47 posts, read 67,628 times
Reputation: 94
Jeans day the first Friday of the month for students with perfect attendance on the B Honor Roll is a reward when you have a dress code.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2014, 07:20 AM
 
Location: Laurentia
5,576 posts, read 7,998,619 times
Reputation: 2446
Many if not most dress codes are either rooted in sexist attitudes or enforced more strictly on girls than boys. Dress codes in and of themselves are not sexist, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 10:42 AM
 
4,875 posts, read 10,071,404 times
Reputation: 1993
Quote:
Originally Posted by metro_me View Post
Jeans day the first Friday of the month for students with perfect attendance on the B Honor Roll is a reward when you have a dress code.
Maybe 20 years ago you would be able to wear jeans any day to school. This uniform phenomenon is artificially controlling students and having it backed up with dubious anecdotal studies to get naive parents on board.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 02:06 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,747,599 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicman View Post
In Japan girls have to wear "bloomers" that show off the legs, but in the US girls have the same kinds of gym shorts boys wear.

Some schools do have risque cheerleading outfits for girls, but others have more modest outfits. Maybe allowing a choice of outfits and/or allowing girls to wear the boys' outfits (and vice versa) may be a good idea. In particular, conservative Muslim students who want to cheerlead would be allowed to wear a boys' cheerleading outfit with a hijab securely fastened.
We used to wear those "bloomers" for PE when I was in jr. high in the early 60s. We wore something different for HS, but I can't for the life of me remember what now.

My experience with cheerleaders here in Colorado is that the HS outfits are pretty modest, but the U of CO cheerleaders' are pretty skimpy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top