Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So you don't think that the GOP's lack of a viable candidate is a problem?
I don't think so. Any POTUS as delusional as Obama who seems to think most Americans still support him can be beat by a box marked "anybody but Obama". Even the contributions from foreigners won't help him this time.
No, I didn't erase your post. For some reason when you quote a post on this board, and that post had something else quoted (as you did with the Bush vs generic Dem), only the part of the post you did not quote shows up. Is the way this board works for some reason.
Anyway, you have seemed to miss my point. Yes both Bushes in 91 & 03 respectively did better than the generic candidate. That is not what I was referring to. What I was referring to is the generic candidate will do better than that party's named candidate.
I used the fact that yes Generic or any Republican leads Obama, when you start naming the Republican whether it be Romney, Bachmann, Palin, Gingrich, Pawlenty, etc, Obama leads. Comprehend now??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255
No, I didn't erase your post. For some reason when you quote a post on this board, and that post had something else quoted (as you did with the Bush vs generic Dem), only the part of the post you did not quote shows up. Is the way this board works for some reason.
Anyway, you have seemed to miss my point. Yes both Bushes in 91 & 03 respectively did better than the generic candidate. That is not what I was referring to. What I was referring to is the generic candidate will do better than that party's named candidate.
I used the fact that yes Generic or any Republican leads Obama, when you start naming the Republican whether it be Romney, Bachmann, Palin, Gingrich, Pawlenty, etc, Obama leads. Comprehend now??
9,000 posts and you still don't know how to isolate sentences and put .. [ quote] [/ quote] around them?
9,000 posts and you still don't know how to isolate sentences and put .. [ quote] [/ quote] around them?
Oh dear, again you do not comprehend. If you were to reply to a post and part of that post appears in quotes, only the portion of the post not in quotes will appear when you try to reply to it. You would technically need to do a cut and paste job to get the entire post there. Simply doing
Quote:
is not going to be enough when the portion within the quotes doesn't show up when you click to reply with quote.
I don't think so. Any POTUS as delusional as Obama who seems to think most Americans still support him can be beat by a box marked "anybody but Obama". Even the contributions from foreigners won't help him this time.
Then why when Obama is matched up in a poll against a name Republican candidate does Obama lead in virtually every poll?
Why do you want to jump in where you obviously are not qualified to do so?
Let me help you.
I have stated what I posted was researched fact .. correct?
Now .. It's up to you to do your own work!
(you know .. give us something that disputes .. my facts)
except for the fact is that you don't have any facts.
You seem to be the only one that believes they are left leaning. Prove it!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
