Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
None of the GOP's "problems" are as big of a problem as Obama's record of failure after failure.
What's amazing to me about the poll is that almost 40% of the people would ***still*** vote for the incompetent twit Obama DESPITE all the evidence that he's in over his head and a miserable failure. Amazing!
So you don't think that the GOP's lack of a viable candidate is a problem?
What this RCP thing says is that as time goes by, Obama tends to be going downhill. Why would that be? Unemployment, economy, his stomping out of rooms when he doesn't get his way? What? It sure is a long time to November 2012.
So you don't think that the GOP's lack of a viable candidate is a problem?
Obama started campaigning in 2008 about February and he has been going this year at least as long. He is a money raising machine but I don't think he will make the $1 billion amount he wanted to make. However, he about tired out in 2008 so maybe he will completely run down this time before the big day.
You Leftists amuse me with your (you think) redirecting tactics.
You conveniently 'skipped' right over the subject that I proved you wrong on!
As a matter of fact .. You erased that entire section in your post!
THIS post of yours has nothing to do with the other post.
Typical and a Great example of how Leftists do the dance around of a subject when it's obvious .. They have lost!
Yep .. Redirection at it's best!
After going back and looking again .. Throw dishonesty into a Liberals bag of tricks!
You erased my entire response and refutation of your assertion when you quoted me!
Sad really!
No, I didn't erase your post. For some reason when you quote a post on this board, and that post had something else quoted (as you did with the Bush vs generic Dem), only the part of the post you did not quote shows up. Is the way this board works for some reason.
Anyway, you have seemed to miss my point. Yes both Bushes in 91 & 03 respectively did better than the generic candidate. That is not what I was referring to. What I was referring to is the generic candidate will do better than that party's named candidate.
I used the fact that yes Generic or any Republican leads Obama, when you start naming the Republican whether it be Romney, Bachmann, Palin, Gingrich, Pawlenty, etc, Obama leads. Comprehend now??
Obama started campaigning in 2008 about February and he has been going this year at least as long. He is a money raising machine but I don't think he will make the $1 billion amount he wanted to make. However, he about tired out in 2008 so maybe he will completely run down this time before the big day.
Actually I believe that he uses extortion to some extent.
Where is .. how much and who guards the Billions that he was successful in extorting from BP!?
I also wonder if the mooslimes who 'funneled' millions to his campaign in 08 will do so again?
Bribes .. Let's not forget those and the payoffs to the unions!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
